🚨 Manchester United fan blasts the Glazers and INEOS amid pressure on Michael Carrick:
🗣️ Reporter: “Maybe we see Carrick sacked soon. Sometimes changing the manager can save a season.”
🗣️ Fan:
“Save what? They’ve been ‘saving the season’ for about ten years.
Sack Carrick. Go on. Sack him tomorrow. Bring another manager in. Give him six months. Everyone gets excited, players start running again, Old Trafford is bouncing and we’re told Manchester United are back.
Then the manager asks for players. Doesn’t get everything he needs. Results turn. Suddenly he’s useless. Sack him as well.
How many times are we going to do this before somebody at the football club has the courage to look upstairs?
At some point you have to become curious. How many different managers have to fail under the same football club before somebody accidentally investigates the people choosing the managers?
That’s the incredible thing about Manchester United. The manager is apparently always responsible for the cycle, but the people running the cycle somehow survive every version of it.
Eventually the Glazers and INEOS have to stop pointing downstairs.
There’s nobody left down there they haven’t blamed.”
I'm genuinely baffled by this one.
Forget Haaland for a moment. Look at Enzo Fernández.
He's in an offside position and, in my view, clearly attempts to play the ball and impacts the situation. That's precisely why the offside law matters here.
VAR has had the opportunity to examine this from multiple angles and still allowed it.
For me, that's a massive VAR error.
...Kalau kita mau fair+sportif, sebenarnya juri² tsb gak salah.
Juri cowo:
Dengan suara tenang jelasin bahwa jawaban yg diucapkan siswi tsb kurang jelas.
Juri cewe:
Dengan suara tinggi mengatakan bahwa jawaban dari murid perempuan tsb diucapkan dengan artikulasi kurang jelas.
Faktanya yah memang kalau kita dengarkan baik² di tayangan ulang terlihat sangt jelas bahwa jawaban yang diucapkan peserta siswi tsb sangat baik artikulasinya.
Jadi si juri cowo melakukan manipulasi dengan ketenangannya.
Sementara juri cewe melakukan gaslighting ke siswi tsb.
Inilah yg gw bilang bahwa kedua juri tsb sebenarnya gak salah.
Mereka adalah representasi sosiologis yang bisa dilihat pada wakil² rakyat di gedung DPR:
1. Denial
2. Tidak mau mendengar
3. Gaslighting
Itulah budaya bangsa kita... (``,)
Bagus Muljadi, profesor termuda Indonesia yang kini mengajar di University of Nottingham, menyentil satu hal penting:
pendidikan kita mahal, tapi arahnya murahan.
Di luar negeri, kampus meringankan biaya dan memamerkan alumni sukses sebagai pertanggungjawaban moral.
Di Indonesia, mahasiswa bayar mahal dulu. Soal masa depan, silakan cari sendiri.