I conduct research to design software, UX systems, data visualizations, & brands, all using Design Thinking methods. I live at Penn State with my wife & kids.
For most of my 15+ years in #UX, I’ve mistakenly tried convincing people of my findings & prescriptions verbally. Recently, I stopped talking & started creating visually appealing deliverables that tell a compelling story and are backed by the same good data. World of difference!
My crack, & I suspect others cracks, has a back-facing nook at the intersection of hole & perineum. This creates the perfect area for poo critters to hide. Because nooks are back-facing, they are almost impossible to access with the wraparound technique. Nook Clean = True Clean
@daxshepard I’m here to persuade you to try “wraparound wiping” vs. “between-the-legs wiping”. I’ve tested both methods & found one clear advantage to the wraparound technique. This single factor negates all the between-the-legs advantages. I call it the “Crack Nook Phenomenon.”
BTW @uxpin, you owe our HTML prototyper an apology! We obsoleted most of our early stage dev needs because of how badass you are. Hahaha. (Don’t feel bad for him. He has plenty of other work to keep him busy.) I keep saying #UXPin is the best tool for mature #UX departments.
@uxpin Thanks for the offer! As #UXPin gets seated deeper into our R&D and agile dev processes, it’s flexible has proven to expand seemingly. Once we get that fleshed out the next step is integrating the design system functionality. That will be the true test of scalability for my org.
Been putting @uxpin through its paces over the last few months. Everything has held up very well against our heavy usage. We got an intern to consolidate our project assets into a design system. I’ll report back how it scales for us. So far, so good!
For people interested, we use @uxpin for high - low fidelity prototypes, workflows and wire flows, active user testing, iterative and collaborative designing, stakeholder reviews, and some dev documentation.