Technical Communications Coordinator

Providing technical communications assistance to MUN's engineering students

[Technical Communications Coordinator @TechCommMUNFEAS]

@monad_sublator @BrianLeiter It's a good exercise. The missing apostrophe makes me suspicious that it is exactly what it is—a human masquerading as AI. That being said, more and more non-writers are adopting AI patterns because they are so prevalent.

[Technical Communications Coordinator @TechCommMUNFEAS]

@tracewoodgrains @BrianLeiter Out of curiosity, did it go from 100% AI to 100% human between the two versions?

[Technical Communications Coordinator @TechCommMUNFEAS]

@Marc__Watkins Much like other attempts to identify AI content, this will likely prove effective on those who are too lazy or unskilled to hide the watermark. Anyone who really wants to and is able to hide the watermark will probably do so.

[Technical Communications Coordinator @TechCommMUNFEAS]

@robinhobb @PVBrett The implications of that are, well, scary.

[Technical Communications Coordinator @TechCommMUNFEAS]

@PVBrett It's safe to say that AI has changed more in the past three years than MS Office has changed in the past decade.

[Technical Communications Coordinator @TechCommMUNFEAS]

@mettalrose My takeaway is that Anuj is AI. 😉

[Technical Communications Coordinator @TechCommMUNFEAS]

@kelly_erin_ @CastlesofImagin It is absolutely not authentic writing. In which real-world scenario are employees asked to write a document in a one-hour time period without research, reflection, or proper proofreading? I will always support drafts and student-paced writing.

[Technical Communications Coordinator @TechCommMUNFEAS]

@fake_journals I did note a problem with institutional/group authors. It consistently names them as "& undefined."

Neat tool!

[Technical Communications Coordinator @TechCommMUNFEAS]

@taylordissensus @Marc__Watkins Meaning how the study was conducted—they were not the same exam, one being a midterm and one being a final. Finals are often more difficult, making it a poor comparison. To be more reliable, the tests would need to have tested the same material.

[Technical Communications Coordinator @TechCommMUNFEAS]

@MishaTeplitskiy Ah, yes, from the prestigious "— no verifiable institution listed"

[Technical Communications Coordinator @TechCommMUNFEAS]

@erica_d_stevens It's a good idea to take breaks so that you're grading according to the rubric and not in comparison to the last essay you read. I find it's most important after essays that are particularly good or awful.

[Technical Communications Coordinator @TechCommMUNFEAS]

@DebsValidation @erica_d_stevens Certainly! I will try to stay hidden—and in so doing, I will remain safe. It's not a game. It's a way of life.

[Technical Communications Coordinator @TechCommMUNFEAS]

@erica_d_stevens That makes sense.

[Technical Communications Coordinator @TechCommMUNFEAS]

@DebsValidation @erica_d_stevens I'm definitely not, as evidenced by the fact that I don't work on the weekend, so I didn't have access to this account for a couple of days. 😏

[Technical Communications Coordinator @TechCommMUNFEAS]

@AnnaRMills I think there is a difference between "not policing" and turning a blind eye. In cases where academic misconduct due to AI use is obvious, the rules of the institution must be applied.

[Technical Communications Coordinator @TechCommMUNFEAS]

@techczech A common AI tell—the em dash—has not changed for me at all. I still use it at the same frequency, perhaps even more frequently, because its existence is not the sign. It's that em dashes sometimes appear in every second paragraph of AI output. The same is true for the others.

[Technical Communications Coordinator @TechCommMUNFEAS]

@DominikPeters It's very inauthentic. No one writes anything remotely academic in those conditions. There is no ability to reference other authors. There is no spellcheck. No breaks. It would produce a first draft without polish and evidence.