Using digital infrastructure, computer hardware and real-estate to build wealth over time โข Stocks๐ โข Crypto๐ช โข Real-estate๐ โข Info, NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE โ ๏ธ
@Questrade Fractional shares and auto drip next please. We shouldn't have to submit a document form to enable features when comititors let you easily toggle features on or off with one click
@yourfriendandy Cash is trash๐ Serves vendors well but individuals zero. I don't keep a penny of it. Money needs to be put to work so it can yield interest to compete or outpace inflation always
@deepernaut Sorry but we don't have any thanks for them creating a bad solution for a problem they made in the first place. The 2nd layer withdrawal limit needs a real explanation - security doesn't make sense when there's already the 10k limit. For now though, I'll let up util the 29th
@deepernaut@Onchainbarista@helloericma And how about some transparency on the burn wallet addressโ๏ธ There's hardly anything decentralized about this project other than the network. Details like that should be a given. Every other part of this project functions with restrictions and controls imposed by Deeper โ ๏ธ๐ฉ
@deepernaut@Onchainbarista@helloericma Remove the total limit of 600k $dpr or scrap the burn feature. Preferable both. There's no example in reputable crypto projects where they have a double limit on txns. The security excuse is just that- an excuse to lock our tokens while devs wait for the pump. NOT OUR KEYS โ๏ธ๐
@deepernaut@Onchainbarista@helloericma We'd like an AMA asap to discuss the current bridge issue. The "optional" burn feature has made it a bidding war on fees just so we can withdraw our own tokens. There's a min burn amount, so it's in fact not optional - false advertising. It's not our keys โ๏ธ๐ $DPR
@deepernaut@helloericma@Onchainbarista Basic math: Deeper has 150k + nodes but an individual bridge limit of 10k $DPR n a total limit of 600k $DPR n at only 2 specific times each day. That means only 0.0008% of nodes max can withdraw through the bridge. The burn feat makes it worse by charging a fee on top โ ๏ธ๐ฉ
@deepernaut@helloericma@Onchainbarista โ ๏ธ๐ฉThe bridge is a chokepoint that @deeper_network created to ensure MONEY FLOWS IN BUT DOESN'T FLOW OUT. 99.99% OF NODES ON THE NETWORK CANNOT WITHDRAW if each txn was maxed at 10k $DPR. THE "OPTIONAL" BURN ISN'T OPTIONAL n just adds gasoline to the fire โฝ๏ธ๐ฅ PONZINOMICS
@deepernaut I'll be on any n every post that gets engagement from @deeper_network n the community ๐ regardless of the source. Stating nothing but pure facts. They need to know they can't walk over people n that change needs to be made or at the least people need to be cautioned โ ๏ธ๐ฉ
@deepernaut Not raging, PATITIONING on a platform where we'll be seen by @deeper_network n the community. It's our right to let them know how we feel when we have skin in the game. Also, gonna expose the facts so that any logical person things twice about investing until Deeper shapes up
@CryptoJar_Net@deeper_network @MEXC_Official @helloericma โ ๏ธ๐ฉThe bridge is a chokepoint that @deeper_network created to ensure money flows in but doesn't flow out. 99.99% of nodes on the network cannot withdraw if each txn was maxed at 10k $DPR. The "optional" burn isn't optional n just adds gasoline to the fire โฝ๏ธ๐ฅ PONZINOMICS
@CryptoJar_Net@deeper_network @MEXC_Official @helloericma We'd like an AMA asap to discuss the current bridge issue. The "optional" burn feature has made it a bidding war on fees just so we can withdraw our own tokens. There's a min burn amount, so it's in fact not optional - false advertising. It's not our keys โ๏ธ๐ $DPR
@CryptoJar_Net@deeper_network @MEXC_Official @helloericma Basic math: Deeper has 150k + nodes but an individual bridge limit of 10k $DPR n a total limit of 600k $DPR n at only 2 specific times each day. That means only 0.0008% of nodes max can withdraw through the bridge. The burn feat makes it worse by charging a fee on top โ ๏ธ๐ฉ