@themillerlaw @Fankie_Mzimela@CassiusNhlamulo @ESPNcricinfo Bob don’t let the truth get in the way of a good story. Yet Supersports didn’t broardcaster that or the abuse but reported Stokes retaliating. Same thing happened when De Kock went at Warner they only showed the response. Oh well
@DanMedeens@SabeehaMajid Excuses excuses ..... own it. And then what’s the excuse for not picking up the fan abusing Warner or the fan abusing stokes. Please comeon you will have more won’t you - always find an excuse to justify behaviour
@CassiusNhlamulo @ESPNcricinfo Mate it was in the middle of the field. Again really simply why wasn’t vision shown of this clown in the crowd and their abuse or of De Kock abusing Warner? Why in both these instances the cameras miraculously only caught the overseas player doing the wrong thing
@SabeehaMajid@shaney_10 @ESPNcricinfo No that was his forth demerit point. Early demerit points were for shouldering players and swearing ..... repeated offences led to the ban
@shaney_10 @ESPNcricinfo @SabeehaMajid Plenty....Rabada is suspended for a long list of abuse and breaches of conduct ....or remember the time when your team couldn’t handle being asked questions about tempering and a security official pushed a journalist over?
@CassiusNhlamulo @ESPNcricinfo No one said that. Stokes deserves to get suspended. But why didn’t the broardcaster also release images and vision of the crowd abuse. Why do they only release images of the overseas player and never of the SA antagonist like in this case or with Warner?
@FirdoseM @ESPNcricinfo Hit him again after a player hits hit in the helmet. What a classless response... why didn’t the host broardcaster share vision of the crowd member abusing Stokes and only of the response...clearly they just wanted to make England look bad
@SabeehaMajid Of course you will have nothing coherent to say in response to the above ..... why only one side released with stokes and one side with Warner? Is it because your broardcaster and cricket board are just trying to make one side look bad...please tell some justification
@SabeehaMajid Both were bad but why did Cricket SA and the broardcaster only release images of Warner doing it and not of what De Kock did. Warner got what he deserved but don’t be manipulated by selective leaks
@SabeehaMajid Both were bad but why did Cricket SA and the broardcaster only release images of Warner doing it and not of De Kock. He got what he deserved but don’t be manipulated by selective leaks. If you can answer me why only one side of vision was released it would be appreciated?
@ESPNcricinfo Why does the South African broadcaster always only show the overseas cricketer doing the wrong thing. Doesn’t show the fans here like they didn’t show De Kock making the comments about Warner’s wife but conveniently leaked Warner reacting....? Why not both
@RaveendraSays @ESPNcricinfo @ICC Perhaps if your crowds stopped acting so horribly. Remember the Cricket SA officials posing with people with Sonny Bill masks and the member who just swore and abused Warner whilst the security guard just stood there.....
@JohnEat30483904@amandavanstone Dude Tim is a white male completely different. In fact just for being white and have a good name like Tim his grant should have been doubled
@amandavanstone Amanda now that you are speaking out about a waste of money and this small amount - how do you feel about the sports grants? Are they ok because they benefited white Australians doing it tough like the Mosman rowing club rather then supporting struggling communities
@deniseshrivell @markhiltonbuck @amandavanstone Dude Amana is white and votes right. Don’t compare that to a woman who is from a different back ground. Plus free speech is only ok if you support Amanda’s view.