@abdul_now You should have one Quran after Uthman compiled it in one book in a written it in the dialect of Quraish by Zied and other two companions then burned all other copies. And according to your scholars Uthmanic Quran not including 7 Ahruf احرف😂
@itsmeepui@Edenlife9 For example, in recitation, the word “سراط” may be pronounced as “سراط”, “صراط”,or “زراط” depending on the reading. However, the written form remains “سراط” in all manuscripts. Try to understand the difference between variations in pronunciation and variations in the written text
@DumnmTheDude@historychem123@Edenlife9 You a good example of Muslim but with corrupted Quran ! You are poor and pathetic! the one who with no argument who can’t defend his religion and He resorts to personal insults! If you can’t to read Arabic then you are blind follower 🌹
@historychem123@Greatguy19871@Edenlife9 The fact is that you just blindly follow. Think about it: the evidence is right in front of you. Compare what you’ve been told with what the evidence actually says. They are completely contradictory. It’s up to you 🌹
@mr_coccos@Edenlife9 Mr cocos this not my opinion this is your scholars opinion! By the way in the first photo manuscript of Quran do you think it is the same Quran today! Don’t mention ORALLY PRESERVED because the Hadith says opposite!
@DumnmTheDude@historychem123@Edenlife9 Even X considered your opinion a spam but anyway I’ll give you some respect and answer you from your book just to make you think twice because my pov came from your books! Don’t be blind follower 😉
@historychem123@Edenlife9 The مالك and ملك there is no dots but one letter been missed nothing to do with dots التشكيل و الحركات ! Read one of your scholar says about that!
@historychem123@Edenlife9 Uthman fixed this problem by compiling the Quran in on book and in the dialect of Quraish,and burned all other copies! Try again
@historychem123@Edenlife9 I agree it was without dots and vowels but remember the strongest claim of muslins! ORALLY PRESERVED التواتر based on that your claim is false! Try again 😉