@SeeMeBe@EllenBarkin@Timpositive@georgehahn Keep doing it, Elon is desperate and pushing as many rubbish ads as possible. Strategy should be:
1. Block all ads you see
2. Block all paid for verification accounts
3. Block all trolls and bots
Remember blocking also costs Elon more in server costs so Block generously...
“The numbers are totally and completely bogus. It’s all completely made up. It feels like they’re arbitrarily writing checks to ppl they like, which is not a sustainable creator strategy,” said a former Twitter executive who worked on creator partnerships https://t.co/uBmKxqsXsN
Spacex IS a disaster. FACT
Starlink provides 5% of revenue spacex predicted.
(a DISASTER)
Starship consumes almost as much REVENUE as the company brings in per year. (a DISASTER)
Reusable rockets (launches/money taken in by company) 2x more expensive!
https://t.co/NutGUeghLH
@K0STUR@Horatio975@vonGammCom@elonmusk None of that proves what Elon claims. More than happy for you to be a guinea pig and test it since you believe Elon's 🦇💩 crazy lies.
@SrCarlosMachina@Tazerface16 Only pathetic losers seriously overcompensating for lacking in certain areas go around calling themselves alpha males...
https://t.co/Wjlva3kVCc
Just wait until real truck owners see how horrible $TSLA service and repairability are. People who use their trucks for work can't afford to get Musked.
@ChadyMattar@Tslachan@JohnnyCashRule1 In this context it doesn't mean anything, it's just another meaningless hype word to get the Tesla cult all horny.
This cartoon demonstrates the purpose of Fox News in a single, powerful image. The elderly man in the center is supposed to represent Rupert Murdoch, the founder of Fox News. 5/5
The absolute state of Twitter and the "enlightened centrists" scene:
World's richest man promoting a Putin apologist interviewing an alleged rapist and human trafficker.
That's a lot of words to say 'yes we allow, amplify and defend Nazis on this 💩 platform''.
Twitter Safety used to protect users, now it runs defence for Elon's hate spreading bigoted friends.
This article is extremely misleading.
The purportedly "landmark" lawsuit concerns six Tweets, and all of those tweets were actioned, and here's exactly how:
— Each of the six Tweets were reported on Twitter, focusing on our terms of service for violations.
— Twitter's systems automatically detected that all six Tweets were either toxic or abusive.
— Twitter immediately restricted the reach of all six tweets (less than 100 impressions per Tweet).
— No person reported any of the Tweets to Twitter under its German legal compliance option.
— After the suits were filed, triggering compliance review, four Tweets were blocked in Germany and two were removed for terms of service violations.
The article also cites two misleading “reports":
— One report claims that Tweets containing anti-Semitic slurs are on the rise on Twitter since its acquisition. The truth is that the number of user impressions of anti-Semitic slurs has gone down since Twitter’s acquisition, both in total and on a per Tweet basis.
— The other report claims that Twitter failed to act on 99 percent of hateful content posted by Twitter Blue subscribers. That figure is blatantly false and Twitter makes moderation decisions with no regard for a user's Twitter Blue status.