@voitechnology@DaveNorthStand Does Voi get warnings for every rider like private owners do seeing as the the risks are the same and the only difference is that you guys make money while private owners don’t?
@TVP_Oxford There’s a single difference in a privately owned e scooter and a rental one; rentals put money in the company’s pocket. The risks are literally exactly the same so give warnings to the companies if you’re giving them to people who privately own one. Hypocrites.
@B_Honest_Boxing@BoxingShrew@FightHubTV I truly believe that’s what they were banking on. Not that Eubank didn’t school him this time around but the excuses when Smith doesn’t give excuses normally shows that he wants to fight again. It’s the only way to “make sure”.
@vegan_rav@q_certi@MichaelBensonn@boxxer And he came back and avenged his loss like an actual man to someone who swore he would have/had no excuses. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 What is your point?
@larissabona@PaulKni31232186@Canellelabelle I don’t think you understand. He filed several suits. Some got dismissed. The ones that were within the statute of limitations got dismissed for no evidence. Ergo, the ones that are moving forward must have credence to his claims.
@larissabona@Canellelabelle@PaulKni31232186 And like you said, the only reason he didn’t get to file was a statute of limitations. Meaning his claims were dismissed because of that and no merit. Meaning the ones that have made it to trial have…?
@larissabona@PaulKni31232186@Canellelabelle You can’t meet legal minimal requirements without some sort of evidence/proof. Hence why claims WITHOUT any evidence/proof get dismissed before even making it to trial.
@PaulKni31232186@Canellelabelle @SSmithWord I give to multiple cancer charities as my grandad passed from cancer and my dad had cancer but survived, I give to multiple women’s charities as my mum was abused by her uncle for years and I buy homeless people meals and don’t YT it. The RF don’t raise money, their buildings do
@larissabona@Canellelabelle@PaulKni31232186 Soooo…it was dismissed because it wasn’t filed in time and didn’t have enough evidence to support it? So whatever wasn’t dismissed has evidence. I don’t understand as a lawyer how you’re failing to comprehend this.
@PaulKni31232186@Canellelabelle @SSmithWord Not mine, the RF’s. My “efforts” aren’t going into anything you try and dictate they go into. Also, if you think Tweeting is an “effort” it makes sense you think the RF actually do “work”.
@larissabona@Canellelabelle@PaulKni31232186 So break down what you just said. One claim was dismissed because it had been too long. Another was because there was no proof. So by the process of elimination, a claim in which it hasn’t been too long and wasn’t dismissed due to lack of proof must have what….?
@SSmithWord @Canellelabelle@PaulKni31232186 So you’re under the belief that if someone doesn’t deny something, even though they may not have even seen it, they’re guilty of that act? Please don’t ever try and teach children. Also, boasting? The judge is accepting there may be merit to the claims. You guys are dumb.
@Bonbon1934@Canellelabelle The person claimed outright, easily provable facts were “my truth”. I suggest you leave it with them before you lose one of the remaining two brain cells you’ve got left. 🤣🤣