@realDonaldTrump I’ll bet my bottom dollar (and we’re damn near close to it, in your economy, sir) that DJT did not write this tweet. Fake news. I shan’t be voting for a single soul who supports YOU or Israel.
@baroncoleman Baron… you’re about to step into Candace’s show. That’s why they are coming for you hard right now. You have to be above it. Stay focused.
@baroncoleman It’s a handful of people I wish everyone would stop giving any kind of attention or focus to: Wilson, his wife, Neff, and Kolvet. They’re all pawns sent out to distract us.
Thesis:
1. A powerful force (PF) acts with impunity inside the U.S. (examples: JFK, RFK, MLK, 9/11, Las Vegas, Covid, J6, Butler, CK)
2. Official investigations (conducted by captured agencies) actively avoid revealing the PF.
3. Cover stories for crimes committed by the PF are reflexively validated and become mainstream narratives.
4. Domain experts are intimidated and punished by the PF for exploring anomalies in official narratives.
5. Domain experts who do respond to these social threats end up fooling themselves in order to resolve their cognitive dissonance, rationalizing official explanations and "debunking" credible hypotheses about the activity of the PF.
6. Dissident, non-conforming experts are ridiculed, leaving them socially and professionally outcast.
7. Because the social and career costs are extreme for those who question official narratives, a market for sophistry emerges--Experts and laypeople alike seek to rationalize their own complacency against the PF.
This is the most comprehensive breakdown of the Tyler Robinson case I've seen yet.
Whoever created this CLEARLY put months of research into this project and and is one of the most gifted legal minds in the history of American jurisprudence.
Trump: So Please raise your right hand: I pledge to the greatest president in the history of the United States
Crowd: I pledge to the greatest president in the history of the United States…
Trump: I'm going to try and cheat like hell like they do.
@CinemaShogun Who tf cares. If he wanted to debate her so bad then he would have traveled anywhere. Candace didn’t owe him a debate. And he damn sure didn’t deserve one. Loser ass.
To Clarify: If you don’t believe the absurd state narrative surrounding Charlie Kirk’s well orchestrated public murder, it does NOT MEAN:
- “You hated Charlie"
- “You are attacking a widow"
- “You want to destroy TPUSA"
- “You’re an anti-semite and you hate Jews"
- “You’re attacking Charlie’s family and closest friends"
- “You’re trying to divide the Right"
- “You’re a communist"
- “You’re in a cult"
- “You’re a demon"
- “You’re a grifter"
- “You’re a conspiracy theorist"
- “You are trying to taint the jury"
- “You’re trying to free a killer"
In reaction to obvious, aggressive, and poorly constructed lies, you are supposed to be skeptical and resistant.
If the furtherance of those lies retards your freedoms (they have), drags your country in to war (they have), and corrupts the judicial system (they have), then you have every right to be furious.
If you’re an American citizen and you pay for all of this, don’t settle for less than the truth and real accountability.
If you’re a Christian, or just a compassionate human, who was appalled by Charlie’s death, don’t be bullied in to silence.
And don’t forget: unless real, and actual “overwhelming evidence” (beyond “REASONABLE DOUBT) is presented that Tyler Robinson murdered Charlie Kirk, don’t allow the state to kill him. He, too, is someone’s son. And, also, a child of God.
Seek truth always. And, do not be afraid.