Apparently a lesson is needed here regarding why “Cis” is a derogatory term.
Have you ever gone to a coffee shop and ordered a “caffeinated coffee”?
No, you haven’t. If you did, you would be laughed at.
Coffee, in its natural form, is caffeinated. And EVERYONE knows that. Decaffeinated coffee needs the differentiation because it is NOT in its natural or original form.
I am a natural born, biological woman. I am not a cis woman. To call me a cis gender person is to assume that I’m capable of CHANGING my gender and I am not. To include myself in your “cis” language would be affirming your delusional beliefs that you can change your gender whenever you want.
When you call me “Cis”, you are calling me a “person with a uterus”.
When you call me “Cis”, you are calling me a person who menstruates.
When you call me “Cis”, you are calling me a chest feeder, a person who can get pregnant and a birthing person.
To be called all of those things is degrading towards women. And we KNOW that you know that. You KNOW that it offends us. Which is why you continue to use the word “cis”.
When you use a word in a way that it degrades the other person, it is then defined as a slur. #Cis #Cisisaslur
The greatest attack on democracy in my lifetime wasn’t when some grandpas trespassed in the Capitol
It was when:
1) Congress passed the Patriot Act to allow the government to spy on its citizens
2) Western governments shut down churches, freedom of assembly, and private businesses over a virus
3) Canada used military force to put down a peaceful protest and then shut down bank accounts of any participants
How the vaccine rollout went for a lot of people:
Covid isn’t that dangerous for my fitness level and age group. I’m not sure I’m going to take the vaccine.
I think I’ll wait.
No really thanks, I’m going to wait.
The vaccine doesn’t seem to stop transmission. Why do you want me to take it so bad?
People seem to be getting injured from this vaccine. I’m not going to take it.
Ivermectin appears to be an effective treatment for Covid, why are they suppressing it and calling it horse paste?
Why is so much information being censored online, and YouTube creators accounts being terminated?
Why does it seem like only one side of the debate is being heard?
Why won’t my friends let me over to their house because I’m not vaccinated?
Why do friends and family members seem to be distancing themselves from me?
Why won’t you let me eat inside of your restaurant because I didn’t take the vaccine?
Why are you trying to take my career away from me for not taking the vaccine?
Why is California holding a lottery to convince people to take the vaccine?
OK this is getting really weird, why is this being pushed on everyone so hard?
Why is the president saying it’s going to be a long winter of severe illness and death for the unvaccinated?
Why does it seem like so many people who took the vaccine are repeatedly getting covid?
Why is there such a drastic uptick in autoimmune diseases and cancers?
Why are the excess death numbers through the roof?
Congratulations to all of you who survived the largest psychological manipulation campaign ever conducted on humanity. You are stronger than you realize.
Warning to all Australians and all people outside of the United States:
The United States is claiming universal jurisdiction, meaning it can put you, a foreigner abroad, on trial in the US and in prison for the rest of your life for activity that is legal in your own country. This is what is being done to Julian Assange right now, imprisoned and facing 175 years in US prison for his outstanding journalistic work which exposed war crimes, torture, extrajudicial assassinations covered up or sanctioned by the US government.
Fifteen questions Americans can ask themselves that are more useful than "What presidential candidate should we vote for?":
1. Why does nothing change no matter who we vote for?
2. Why does US foreign policy always continue along the same trajectory regardless of the president's party or platform?
3. What keeps our voting population split right down the middle into two political factions of equal size, with neither side ever gaining enough of a majority to democratically change society in any meaningful way?
4. Why does the stalemate described in #3 always seem to benefit the rich, the powerful, and the war-horny?
5. Why is it that the most consequential US government policies like plutocratic influence, privatization, globalization, ecocidal capitalism and nuclear brinkmanship are never on the ballot? Why do these things keep happening, against our interests, without our ever voting for them or electing anyone who campaigned on the pledge to enact them?
6. If our federal government's behavior never changes no matter who we elect, could it be that there are other bodies involved in government policy-setting whom we did not elect, and who remain in positions of influence regardless of the comings and goings of our official elected government?
7. If the above is the case, then who is it? Who's really calling the shots in this country?
8. Could it be that everything we've been told about our country, our government, our political processes and our world is untrue?
9. If so, what are the implications of the fact that our schools and our media have been feeding us lies since we were small?
10. What forces would be responsible for keeping all these lies flowing throughout our society? What might keep an ostensibly free press spinning more or less the same lies throughout the western world day after day, year after year, generation after generation?
11. Is it possible that our entire electoral system is a sham designed to give the public the illusion of control so that they'll let oligarchs and empire managers run the country undisturbed?
12. If the electoral system is a sham, then how do we enact the changes we so desperately need?
13. Is it possible that there are other ways to effect change in the United States which don't involve casting a pretend vote in a fake election?
14. Could it be that those other means of forcing change are precisely what the charade of casting pretend votes in fake elections is meant to divert us from?
15. Should we perhaps spend less energy bickering about who should get sworn into the White House a year and a half from now, and more energy examining other possible avenues toward advancing meaningful change?
In 2010, the OHCHR called America's use of depleted uranium shells in Iraq, a crime against humanity, which would threaten the health of civilians for an indefinite period of time. https://t.co/9Lb2LaezWa
Oliver Stone: Ukraine on Fire. Too many facts, esp on CIA funded Ukraine Nazis, that conflict with the West Narrative on Ukraine I can see why it is banned from YouTube et al. https://t.co/XydKxIx9l6
During the pandemic, while the WHO and ECDC both recommended against toddler masking, @CDCgov and @AmerAcadPeds both recommend in favor. How do these organizations recover their reputations from such an unscientific failure?
Harvard applicants in the top academic decile have different chances of admission depending on their race:
- Asians: 12.7%
- Whites: 15.3%
- Hispanics: 31.3%
- Blacks: 56.1%
Affirmative Action is systemic racism. This is what modern bigotry looks like.