@msbellows Don't get butthurt because you cannot follow an argument, are a pathetic lawyer and fail in trying to compensate for these deficiencies by insinuating yourself in an argument in which you cannot keep pace.
Ruth Bader Gingsburg will be out by year's end.
heh heh heh
@msbellows @fawfulfan@Quest1743 @markpopham M.S. Bellows is an emblem for the improvidence of expanding this country's law schools. Time line:
MS gets a 134 on his LSAT
MS takes out BIG loans
MS rejected by all reputable firms
MS takes a job for 34K in sanctuary city
MS embarrasses himself incessantly by boasting of degree
@msbellows @fawfulfan@Quest1743 @markpopham Poor-poor M.S. Bellows, Jr. -- how ashamed must be Bellows, Sr. -- instead of responding with substance, the wittle fella awkwardly inserts his 'muh law degree & muh job as a prosecutor in a sanctuary city'. Is this supposed to flatten me in stupefaction? OMG, Bellows went to LS?
@jessicadroeger Semantics is not your strong suit, Jessica. You cannot reconfigure reality by simply softening the relevant language. And, yes, they are documented -- in their country of origin; where they shall be returned. Besides, these places are glorious paradises, remember?
#NotShitHoles
@msbellows @fawfulfan@Quest1743 @markpopham I never said statutory law trumps Constitutional law; my comment was in reference to the statutes that flow from the Constitution itself. The SC decision rendering certain statutes unconstitutional was deliberated by an activist court. Judicial activism is at death's door.
@fawfulfan@Quest1743 @markpopham Exactly as i said, bolsheviks cannot help but hoist themselves on their own petard. 'The Preamble isn't binding'? It is in fact the premise from which all subsequent clauses and articles flow, dullard.
@fawfulfan @PJLM @Quest1743 @markpopham Don't worry the SC will be completely restocked inside of 3 years. By the end of the 7th, it'll be restored to a body of textual interpreters. Sorry hilldog didn't get to appoint Scalia's replacement. I'm sure Obama thought it wise to defer and avoid suspicion in the #PillowCase
@71djt@fawfulfan@Quest1743 @markpopham No, Matthew is making me laugh. I seek to encourage the commies to show their true colors. All that's need to destroy bolshevism is giving it a platform. Matthew's premise is that America is a free-for-all and the Constitution makes provision for all their criminality. Hilarious.
@zmann@fawfulfan@Quest1743 @markpopham Are you familiar with something called a dissenting opinion? Do you likewise believe the SC jurists who disagree are any less informed on statutory law? I will furthermore ask if you believe the SC always gets it right?
@IAEngineer@fawfulfan@Quest1743 @markpopham OMG! do the limp-wristed bolsheviks on twitter disagree with me?
just a heads-up, commie wastrels: virulent, hostile anti-americanism and biasing your every argument against Americans does not play well in America. This should be self-evident. But I do encourage you to keep it up
@fawfulfan@Quest1743 @markpopham Citizens who're similarly criminals have rights under the Constitution. Illegals haven't any. They have only the basic human rights -- to be fed and clothed while in transit to their country of origin.
@fawfulfan@Quest1743 @markpopham Well, Matthew, they & you have a flawed understanding of statutory law. If a person is here illegally, that in itself voids legal protection. The only rights extended an illegal alien is safe passage home. They can then, from their home country, petition the court for redress.
@fawfulfan@Quest1743 @markpopham People like @fawfulfan are so befuddled and blinkered viz the Constitution they think it covers every person in the entire world -- regardless their citizenship. Please do teach on, cowboy. What don't I understand?
@fawfulfan@Quest1743 @markpopham Constitutional protections are not extended to illegal aliens.
Illegal aliens have no rights as citizens.
These are basic principals, Matthew. If you want to be taken seriously, start thinking like a serious-minded person.