Akashdeep Singh

🥇🎓CA Finalist ⛳
🇮🇳 INDIAN PUNJABI SIKH 🙏🏻
15 Aug 🎂
FOREVER GRATEFUL

[Akashdeep Singh @TheAkash_4]

#ICAI
#icaiexam

[Akashdeep Singh @TheAkash_4]

Do you remember when you joined X? I do! #MyXAnniversary

[Akashdeep Singh @TheAkash_4]

As a fellow what??

[Dhruv Rathee @dhruv_rathee]

As a fellow travel vlogger also, I will recommend taking photos with aldabra tortoises, its a lot of fun.

Enjoy your vacation!

[Akashdeep Singh @TheAkash_4]

@caabhishekjpr @akhilpachori Right 👍🏻

[Akashdeep Singh @TheAkash_4]

Really useful tools by Mayur sir we have been using his TDS mapping system during Q4 and current TDS deposit process and they all have been very handy and time saving

[Taxation Updates (CA Mayur J Sondagar) @TaxationUpdates]

ITR 1 & ITR 2 filers → Form 10-IEA = NOT required. Ever.

ITR 3 & ITR 4 filers → Form 10-IEA filing required before due date u/s 139(1) whenever changing regime
(AY 2026-27 is 3rd Year of Form 10-IEA so if you have opted for old regime in AY 2024-25 and then new regime in AY 2025-26 then you can't opt for old regime in AY 2026-27)

Built a free tool covering all 64 scenarios.
FY 2023-24 → 2024-25 → 2025-26

This tool will help in guiding applicability of Form 10-IEA and switching Restrictions along will tabular presentation of all 64 possibilities depend on previous year filing
🔗 https://t.co/tt6O5cXQYb

#TaxationUpdates

[Adios @evenprimeodd]

@MoSyed110 The abuse is unacceptable, however, the hate train began after you posted the video confronting VIK about his remarks.

[Adios @evenprimeodd]

Look guys KSI achieved 100 million views this month and 64 million of those are from the katana YouTube short and then this dude has the AUDACITY to take shots at Vikkstar lmfao

[Loked @idkanat]

@MoSyed110 You’re a plague who is essentially getting into his head so he can attempt to persue something which has never even been recreated. It only works with new faces not already established ones. Due to this you have ruined a perfectly good dynamic between friends. Was a fan.

[ibra @Ibrail10]

He used to be a YouTuber who don’t care about number and is famous because of his personality and you change him just shame on you

[Adios @evenprimeodd]

KSI’s editor Mo Syed will do big time damage to him, all this ego boosting he’s given him, with zero creativity and just plainly copying mr beast content. Subscriber numbers n all mean fuck all. And for KSI to not be there for a farewell video either by cutting it short? Selfish

[Akashdeep Singh @TheAkash_4]

@navdeepdahiya55 In the Chandigarh area near mohali it is raining heavily with thunderstorms
What's the update for tomorrow?

[VEDANT @VEDANTSHRIV17]

Thanks to the people who supported us in these tough times and we faced so much mental harrasment because of this . People called us antinational and Pakistani just because we raised a genuine concern and at the end Truth has prevailed .

[Shut Up Counsel @ShutUpCounsel]

Dear Sir,

The two thirds members of the Rajya Sabha belonging to the Aam Aadmi Party who have joined the Bharatiya Janata Party, even upon a public declaration to that effect, do not satisfy the constitutional requirements of a valid “merger” under Paragraph 4 of the Tenth Schedule.

The scheme of the Constitution, particularly after the deletion of the provision relating to split, recognises merger as a limited exception which mandates a merger of the original political party itself, and not merely a shift in allegiance by members of the legislature party.

The Constitution Bench in Subhash Desai v. Principal Secretary, Governor of Maharashtra has authoritatively clarified that the legislature party and the political party are distinct entities, and that a numerical majority of legislators cannot, by itself, claim to represent the political party or effect a merger on its behalf. In the absence of any material indicating a merger of the organisational structure of the Aam Aadmi Party with the Bharatiya Janata Party, the defence under Paragraph 4 is not attracted.

In other words - "The defence of merger is available only when the original political party merges with another political party and not when there is merely a split in the legislature party.....A claim of merger cannot be founded merely on the numerical strength of the legislature party."

In such circumstances, the act of joining another political party constitutes “voluntarily giving up membership” within the meaning of Paragraph 2(1)(a) of the Tenth Schedule, as consistently interpreted in Ravi S Naik v Union of India and Rajendra Singh Rana v. Swami Prasad Maurya. The constitutional consequence of such conduct is disqualification, irrespective of the existence of a formal resignation.

Accordingly, the concerned members incur disqualification upon such conduct and are liable to be declared disqualified, the adjudicatory determination by the Chairman under Paragraph 6 of the Tenth Schedule being a formal recognition of an already incurred constitutional consequence. The plea of merger, founded solely on numerical strength within the legislature party, is therefore legally unsustainable.

Also, the Supreme Court in Keisham Meghachandra Singh v. The Hon’ble Speaker, Manipur Legislative Assembly held that the Speaker should ordinarily decide disqualification petitions within three months, except in rare and exceptional circumstances. This was reiterated and strengthened in Subhash Desai v. Principal Secretary, Governor of Maharashtra, where the Court emphasised that delays defeat the very purpose of the Tenth Schedule.

Therefore the Vice President - RS Chairman should decide this within 3 months of the complaint filed by the AAP.

Also, Do Note - if the Chairman fails to do so, as done in the Ravinder Singh Rana v Swami Prasad Maurya, the Supreme Court itself can also direct for their immediate disqualification.

No one can save Raghav Chadda because like a fool he said it in public.

[Akashdeep Singh @TheAkash_4]

I would say they are MPs due to The majority given by Punjab to AAP.

[Abhishek Raja "Ram" @abhishekrajaram]

Raghav Chadha formally joins the BJP along with Ashok Mittal and Sandeep Pathak, representing two-thirds of the Aam Aadmi Party's Rajya Sabha MPs, merging with the Bharatiya Janata Party.

They invoked constitutional provisions, as they constitute two-thirds of AAP's Rajya Sabha members, preventing disqualification under anti-defection laws.

Big setback to Arvind Kejriwal and Aam Aadmi Party.

Addressing a press conference with Sandeep Pathak and Ashok Mittal, AAP MP Raghav Chadha says, "We have decided that we, the 2/3rd members belonging to the AAP in Rajya Sabha, exercise the provisions of the Constitution of India and merge ourselves with the BJP."

What are your views on this issue?

[CA Akhil Pachori @akhilpachori]

Some people nowadays:

[Akashdeep Singh @TheAkash_4]

@PratibhaGoyal And what forms can be filed for now maam?

[a @comfortcafex]

4 saal se march hi chal raha hai

[Atul Modani @atulmodani]

@caparveensharma Agree on this as far as AS is concerned.

There shouldn't be any negative marking for presentation.

[Kanika. @Ishu2400]

Marks mat do, yeh negative marking ka kya system hai…?

[Nobita Gupta @Nobiita52]

I am not sure whether this has been done before or not I personally haven’t heard of it . However after introducing three attempts per year, things don’t seem to be going well. Job hunting is becoming very difficult, and now even passing the exams has become harder.
#icai

[Ɽãvĩ Ʈẽjǎ @iamraviteja3]

@CAHimankSingla Leave them Bro

Have a check on this Bro

It really hurts the people after seeing this type of evaluation

Like this question, she is short of 15 marks actaully she should get

For Aggregate she is short of 8 marks, Now she lost interest in group 1