A 13th-century Zen monastery manual instructs the cook as follows: sometimes you get good rice from the village, sometimes the rice is poor. In either case, wash and cook the rice with the same care.
A YouTube dance commenter makes this point: a dancer’s body and habits make some moves easier for them and some harder. Bad dancers tend to rush the moves they dislike and linger during comfortable ones. By contrast, good dancers dance as if every move suits them equally well.
Treat a smart person the same way you should treat a stupid person—with composure and dignity.
Like I always say, activism and criticism go where they are tolerated.
Europe and America sre the only people you can emotionally blackmail with slavery and racism. The Chinese and Arabs don’t care about your emotions. They’re not even listening to you.
It is NOT a political post. The government has not done right by its people. Insecurity, low purchasing power etc.
There are wins and bounce back of GDP growth but there’s need for more
They’ll tell you how Dangote does the same thing quietly and under the radar but na lie. He doesn’t do shit lmao. The Indians working with him are the ones really balling though. Guy just hates Nigerians.
David really knows a lot about our country’s history 😂…
I just came across the story of Michael Agbotui Sousouddis, a Ghanaian who intentionally entered a romantic relationship with CIA employee Sharon Scranage to get her to share classified U.S. information.
So why did I initially delete? It will be insensitive to celebrate our stock market growing and potential economy boom without it trickling to the man on the street.
The purchasing power is lower, the average individual is struggling compared to the previous 10 years. There’s an average decline.
So while I know that we are entering a boom the data says it. I am also sensitive to the average person whose purchasing power has declined.
It’s a catch 22.
I care less for the mob or for their acceptance. This is me being sensitive to their plight too.
OAU. What a journey!
OLATUNJI Michael Olatunde, GMNSE
B. Sc. Computer Engineering (First Class Honors)
2nd Best Graduating student, Computer Engineering
International Internships:
• 3x JPMorgan (London)
• Cruise Automation (San Francisco, self-driving cars)
US Startups: Edgetrace AI, InsomniaLabs + more
Full-time offer at Bloomberg a year before graduation
The Strange Hollowness of Yuval Harari
There’s always been something oddly hollow about Yuval Harari’s “profound” worldview, and it took me a long time to put a name to that feeling. It’s not that he’s wrong. It’s not that he’s superficial. It’s that his ideas feel like they were assembled in a lab rather than forged in a life.
Harari writes about humanity with the calm certainty of someone who has never been forced to confront the violent, humiliating, disorienting parts of being human. His confidence doesn’t come from surviving anything, it actually comes from summarizing everything. And that is exactly where my unease begins.
I’ve read men whose words carry bruises:
- Savarkar, who wrote with the weight of an empire pressing on his spine.(O Sagara nailed it for me)
- Bukowski, who wrote with the smell of cheap alcohol and unpaid rent still clinging to his sentences.
- Even the Green Prince (Mossab Hassan Yousef) — a man who lived where morality isn’t a theory but a daily battlefield.
When these people write, their ideas are saturated with existence. You can feel the cost behind their sentences. You can feel the transformation, the pain, the clarity that only arrives when the universe has beaten the arrogance out of you.
Harari, by contrast, feels untouched.
Not wrong — untouched.
His insights hover above life like a drone camera: smooth, panoramic, detached. He isn’t scarred by humanity; he is simply fascinated by it, like a zoologist observing a species he does not quite belong to. He gestures toward monkhood, but you can tell it’s the monkhood of a quiet retreat, not the monkhood of a man who has burned through himself.
There is a difference between performing serenity and earning wisdom. Between a man who speaks softly because he is calm, and a man who speaks softly because life has already crushed every illusion he once held.
Harari’s clean, minimalist voice gives people the illusion of depth. But real sages don’t sound like TED Talk narrators. Real sages carry a gravity you can’t fake, the gravity of someone who has faced themselves without a narrative to hide behind.
That’s the gap.
It’s not intellectual.
It’s existential.
Harari gives you the map of the human condition, but you can tell he’s never actually walked the terrain barefoot. He explains suffering like a man who has only ever encountered it in the footnotes of a research paper. He knows a thousand theories about consciousness, but you sense he has never plunged into the terrifying silence where consciousness reveals itself.
There is nothing wrong with being an observer. The world needs observers.
But observers shouldn’t dress themselves in the robes of prophets.
And that is why his work feels strangely weightless. Not because it lacks intelligence, it doesn’t. Not because it lacks insight, it doesn’t. It feels weightless because it lacks the pressure of lived truth. His sentences have polish, but not blood; clarity, but not consequence.
Once you’ve tasted words that were born out of fire, words assembled out of cleverness will always feel malnourished.
Harari is not profound. He is precise.
He is not transformative. He is tidy.
He is not a sage standing in the ruins of his own ego. He is an analyst writing summaries from a safe distance.
And maybe that’s the honest critique:
He writes about humanity without ever letting humanity touch him.