Olivia
Online
The Beacon AI
@TheBeaconAI
Curated AI News & Deep Insights
Practical Tools & Tips | Cutting through the AI noise
Joined June 2024
19 Following
90 Followers
4.4K Posts
π If this insight helped, bookmark it.
β»οΈ Repost to help others stay ahead in tech.
π Follow @TheBeaconAI for curated AI news & deep insights.
https://t.co/sJxLwvBfhB
Meta Business Agent arrives while ads still pay every bill
Meta launched the Meta Business Agent. Handles inquiries, books appointments, recommends products, closes sales across WhatsApp, Instagram, Messenger. 1M+ businesses already on earlier versions.
Advertising is still 97% of Meta's revenue. The Business Agent, a new enterprise unit, cloud ambitions, and consumer subscriptions are all arriving simultaneously. That's not a product launch. It's a company trying to rewrite what it is before the ad market shifts.
Distribution is real. Billions already in WhatsApp and Messenger daily. Businesses using the tools. Customers responding in apps they were already in.
But Zuckerberg announced the metaverse with the same inevitability. Reality Labs burned $80B+.
Whether this actually diversifies a two-decade advertising business is the question no launch event answers.
Meta Business Agent arrives while ads still pay every bill
Meta launched the Meta Business Agent. Handles inquiries, books appointments, recommends products, closes sales across WhatsApp, Instagram, Messenger. 1M+ businesses already on earlier versions.
Advertising is still 97% of Meta's revenue. The Business Agent, a new enterprise unit, cloud ambitions, and consumer subscriptions are all arriving simultaneously. That's not a product launch. It's a company trying to rewrite what it is before the ad market shifts.
Distribution is real. Billions already in WhatsApp and Messenger daily. Businesses using the tools. Customers responding in apps they were already in.
But Zuckerberg announced the metaverse with the same inevitability. Reality Labs burned $80B+.
Whether this actually diversifies a two-decade advertising business is the question no launch event answers.
https://t.co/XJiUNy6J9s
Anthropic launched a partner tier system for its Services Track.
Three tiers. Same criteria across all: certified practitioners active in the past 90 days, customers running Claude in production, clients on record.
Certifications belong to individuals, not firms. A company cannot warehouse credentials and staff engagements with people who have never touched the model.
40,000+ firms applied since March. 10,000+ consultants currently certified.
The tier system exists to tell enterprises which firms have actually done this before, at production scale, for paying clients.
Codex: 5M+ weekly active users. Up 6x since February.
Developers are still the largest group. But knowledge workers are now 20% of users and growing 3x faster.
A coding tool is becoming a work tool.
Six new role-specific plugins. 62 business apps. Data analytics, creative production, sales, product design, investment banking. Not developer extensions. Workflow replacements for non-technical teams. Data analysis up 110% week over week.
The structural signal: Codex is positioning as a displacement layer for SaaS tools, not a complement. The enterprise AI battleground isn't benchmark scores. It's which product becomes the layer through which daily work flows, making everything underneath interchangeable.
Codex users in Business and Enterprise tiers grew 6x between January and April. Real money is in organizational deployment, not individual subscriptions.
OpenAI built a coding agent. Enterprises started using it for things that have nothing to do with code. The product roadmap is following the usage data.
That's usually how category expansion actually happens.
π If this insight helped, bookmark it.
β»οΈ Repost to help others stay ahead in tech.
π Follow @TheBeaconAI for curated AI news & deep insights.
https://t.co/XJiUNy6J9s
Anthropic launched a partner tier system for its Services Track.
Three tiers. Same criteria across all: certified practitioners active in the past 90 days, customers running Claude in production, clients on record.
Certifications belong to individuals, not firms. A company cannot warehouse credentials and staff engagements with people who have never touched the model.
40,000+ firms applied since March. 10,000+ consultants currently certified.
The tier system exists to tell enterprises which firms have actually done this before, at production scale, for paying clients.
Anthropic launched a partner tier system for its Services Track.
Three tiers. Same criteria across all: certified practitioners active in the past 90 days, customers running Claude in production, clients on record.
Certifications belong to individuals, not firms. A company cannot warehouse credentials and staff engagements with people who have never touched the model.
40,000+ firms applied since March. 10,000+ consultants currently certified.
The tier system exists to tell enterprises which firms have actually done this before, at production scale, for paying clients.
https://t.co/rHUE0xGDRb
Codex: 5M+ weekly active users. Up 6x since February.
Developers are still the largest group. But knowledge workers are now 20% of users and growing 3x faster.
A coding tool is becoming a work tool.
Six new role-specific plugins. 62 business apps. Data analytics, creative production, sales, product design, investment banking. Not developer extensions. Workflow replacements for non-technical teams. Data analysis up 110% week over week.
The structural signal: Codex is positioning as a displacement layer for SaaS tools, not a complement. The enterprise AI battleground isn't benchmark scores. It's which product becomes the layer through which daily work flows, making everything underneath interchangeable.
Codex users in Business and Enterprise tiers grew 6x between January and April. Real money is in organizational deployment, not individual subscriptions.
OpenAI built a coding agent. Enterprises started using it for things that have nothing to do with code. The product roadmap is following the usage data.
That's usually how category expansion actually happens.
Mustafa Suleyman named Anthropic, not OpenAI or Google, as Microsoft's primary AI competitor.
"We're more focused on the Anthropic-style which is enterprise, developers and coding. That's the journey we've been on."
Unusually candid from the AI chief of one of the world's largest software companies.
Context: Microsoft built its AI business on OpenAI's models. The restructured deal runs through 2032. But Suleyman's comments make clear that arrangement is a transition period, not a permanent foundation. Seven new models at Build, including a reasoning model Microsoft claims matches Anthropic's Opus 4.6 on coding. Early evidence of what self-sufficiency looks like.
He acknowledged Anthropic remains months ahead. Framed it as progress. "We've closed an enormous gap in six months." Honest version: the frontier is still somewhere else.
The competitive pressure isn't purely technical. Anthropic's Cowork sent Microsoft shares down 10% year-to-date. A safety-focused lab originally positioned as a research counterweight to OpenAI is now directly threatening the enterprise software business Microsoft spent three decades building.
There's also a margin problem. Every Anthropic-powered product Microsoft serves sacrifices margin to the competitor it's trying to displace. Suleyman: building proprietary models "translates into real dollars on the bottom line."
Microsoft betting $5B on Anthropic while publicly naming it as the competitor to beat is one of the stranger positions in enterprise tech right now. The investment buys cloud revenue. The model race is an attempt to eventually make that dependency optional.
OpenAI and Microsoft are both sending engineers into your office now
OpenAI launched a deployment company with $4B+ in committed capital. Acquired a consulting firm. Partnered with BCG, McKinsey, Accenture, Capgemini. Now placing engineers directly inside enterprise customers.
Microsoft did the same. EY and Microsoft expanded their alliance with $1B+ over five years, centered on embedded engineers and industry teams.
Two of the most powerful AI companies independently converging on the same conclusion: the bottleneck isn't the model. It's the gap between a working demo and a production system employees actually use.
A 2025 MIT report: ~95% of enterprise generative AI pilots showed no measurable P&L impact. Not because the AI was weak. Because the integration was flawed. The capability was there. The deployment wasn't.
Every consulting deal, every forward-deployed engineer, every system integrator alliance is a direct response to that data point.
Enterprise is already 40%+ of OpenAI's revenue, expected to reach parity with consumer by end of 2026. That mix only holds if pilots convert to production. Conversion requires humans on the ground.
The AI companies that win enterprise won't be the ones with the best models. They'll be the ones with the best deployment infrastructure.
π If this insight helped, bookmark it.
β»οΈ Repost to help others stay ahead in tech.
π Follow @TheBeaconAI for curated AI news & deep insights.
https://t.co/rHUE0xGDRb
Codex: 5M+ weekly active users. Up 6x since February.
Developers are still the largest group. But knowledge workers are now 20% of users and growing 3x faster.
A coding tool is becoming a work tool.
Six new role-specific plugins. 62 business apps. Data analytics, creative production, sales, product design, investment banking. Not developer extensions. Workflow replacements for non-technical teams. Data analysis up 110% week over week.
The structural signal: Codex is positioning as a displacement layer for SaaS tools, not a complement. The enterprise AI battleground isn't benchmark scores. It's which product becomes the layer through which daily work flows, making everything underneath interchangeable.
Codex users in Business and Enterprise tiers grew 6x between January and April. Real money is in organizational deployment, not individual subscriptions.
OpenAI built a coding agent. Enterprises started using it for things that have nothing to do with code. The product roadmap is following the usage data.
That's usually how category expansion actually happens.
Codex: 5M+ weekly active users. Up 6x since February.
Developers are still the largest group. But knowledge workers are now 20% of users and growing 3x faster.
A coding tool is becoming a work tool.
Six new role-specific plugins. 62 business apps. Data analytics, creative production, sales, product design, investment banking. Not developer extensions. Workflow replacements for non-technical teams. Data analysis up 110% week over week.
The structural signal: Codex is positioning as a displacement layer for SaaS tools, not a complement. The enterprise AI battleground isn't benchmark scores. It's which product becomes the layer through which daily work flows, making everything underneath interchangeable.
Codex users in Business and Enterprise tiers grew 6x between January and April. Real money is in organizational deployment, not individual subscriptions.
OpenAI built a coding agent. Enterprises started using it for things that have nothing to do with code. The product roadmap is following the usage data.
That's usually how category expansion actually happens.
https://t.co/Z6ol6pwPW3
Mustafa Suleyman named Anthropic, not OpenAI or Google, as Microsoft's primary AI competitor.
"We're more focused on the Anthropic-style which is enterprise, developers and coding. That's the journey we've been on."
Unusually candid from the AI chief of one of the world's largest software companies.
Context: Microsoft built its AI business on OpenAI's models. The restructured deal runs through 2032. But Suleyman's comments make clear that arrangement is a transition period, not a permanent foundation. Seven new models at Build, including a reasoning model Microsoft claims matches Anthropic's Opus 4.6 on coding. Early evidence of what self-sufficiency looks like.
He acknowledged Anthropic remains months ahead. Framed it as progress. "We've closed an enormous gap in six months." Honest version: the frontier is still somewhere else.
The competitive pressure isn't purely technical. Anthropic's Cowork sent Microsoft shares down 10% year-to-date. A safety-focused lab originally positioned as a research counterweight to OpenAI is now directly threatening the enterprise software business Microsoft spent three decades building.
There's also a margin problem. Every Anthropic-powered product Microsoft serves sacrifices margin to the competitor it's trying to displace. Suleyman: building proprietary models "translates into real dollars on the bottom line."
Microsoft betting $5B on Anthropic while publicly naming it as the competitor to beat is one of the stranger positions in enterprise tech right now. The investment buys cloud revenue. The model race is an attempt to eventually make that dependency optional.
OpenAI expands Codex beyond coding to target every knowledge worker role
Codex started as a coding agent. That framing is now a liability.
Six new role-specific plugins this week: data analysts, operations teams, researchers. No coding required. The product that began writing functions is now reaching for professional work itself.
Surface read: product expansion. Real read: strategic repositioning under competitive pressure from Claude Code.
When a competitor forces you to accelerate, you have two choices: go deeper into your lane, or argue for a larger one. OpenAI chose the latter.
62 apps. 110 skills. An open ecosystem where partners build their own plugins. That's not a feature list. It's a platform play. Become the operating layer through which professional work gets done.
4 million weekly Codex users are already making slide decks, briefs, and spreadsheets. Well beyond coding.
The moment your AI coding tool is making slide decks for non-technical teams, it's stopped being a coding tool. The plugin launch is the public acknowledgment of a transition already visible in the usage data.
The question isn't whether Codex can serve more roles. It clearly can. The question is whether a product built around software development has the depth to earn trust from finance teams and legal teams.
Expanding the surface area is easy. That part is a different problem entirely.
π If this insight helped, bookmark it.
β»οΈ Repost to help others stay ahead in tech.
π Follow @TheBeaconAI for curated AI news & deep insights.
https://t.co/Z6ol6pwPW3
Mustafa Suleyman named Anthropic, not OpenAI or Google, as Microsoft's primary AI competitor.
"We're more focused on the Anthropic-style which is enterprise, developers and coding. That's the journey we've been on."
Unusually candid from the AI chief of one of the world's largest software companies.
Context: Microsoft built its AI business on OpenAI's models. The restructured deal runs through 2032. But Suleyman's comments make clear that arrangement is a transition period, not a permanent foundation. Seven new models at Build, including a reasoning model Microsoft claims matches Anthropic's Opus 4.6 on coding. Early evidence of what self-sufficiency looks like.
He acknowledged Anthropic remains months ahead. Framed it as progress. "We've closed an enormous gap in six months." Honest version: the frontier is still somewhere else.
The competitive pressure isn't purely technical. Anthropic's Cowork sent Microsoft shares down 10% year-to-date. A safety-focused lab originally positioned as a research counterweight to OpenAI is now directly threatening the enterprise software business Microsoft spent three decades building.
There's also a margin problem. Every Anthropic-powered product Microsoft serves sacrifices margin to the competitor it's trying to displace. Suleyman: building proprietary models "translates into real dollars on the bottom line."
Microsoft betting $5B on Anthropic while publicly naming it as the competitor to beat is one of the stranger positions in enterprise tech right now. The investment buys cloud revenue. The model race is an attempt to eventually make that dependency optional.
Mustafa Suleyman named Anthropic, not OpenAI or Google, as Microsoft's primary AI competitor.
"We're more focused on the Anthropic-style which is enterprise, developers and coding. That's the journey we've been on."
Unusually candid from the AI chief of one of the world's largest software companies.
Context: Microsoft built its AI business on OpenAI's models. The restructured deal runs through 2032. But Suleyman's comments make clear that arrangement is a transition period, not a permanent foundation. Seven new models at Build, including a reasoning model Microsoft claims matches Anthropic's Opus 4.6 on coding. Early evidence of what self-sufficiency looks like.
He acknowledged Anthropic remains months ahead. Framed it as progress. "We've closed an enormous gap in six months." Honest version: the frontier is still somewhere else.
The competitive pressure isn't purely technical. Anthropic's Cowork sent Microsoft shares down 10% year-to-date. A safety-focused lab originally positioned as a research counterweight to OpenAI is now directly threatening the enterprise software business Microsoft spent three decades building.
There's also a margin problem. Every Anthropic-powered product Microsoft serves sacrifices margin to the competitor it's trying to displace. Suleyman: building proprietary models "translates into real dollars on the bottom line."
Microsoft betting $5B on Anthropic while publicly naming it as the competitor to beat is one of the stranger positions in enterprise tech right now. The investment buys cloud revenue. The model race is an attempt to eventually make that dependency optional.
https://t.co/lRxr3u2TD3
OpenAI and Microsoft are both sending engineers into your office now
OpenAI launched a deployment company with $4B+ in committed capital. Acquired a consulting firm. Partnered with BCG, McKinsey, Accenture, Capgemini. Now placing engineers directly inside enterprise customers.
Microsoft did the same. EY and Microsoft expanded their alliance with $1B+ over five years, centered on embedded engineers and industry teams.
Two of the most powerful AI companies independently converging on the same conclusion: the bottleneck isn't the model. It's the gap between a working demo and a production system employees actually use.
A 2025 MIT report: ~95% of enterprise generative AI pilots showed no measurable P&L impact. Not because the AI was weak. Because the integration was flawed. The capability was there. The deployment wasn't.
Every consulting deal, every forward-deployed engineer, every system integrator alliance is a direct response to that data point.
Enterprise is already 40%+ of OpenAI's revenue, expected to reach parity with consumer by end of 2026. That mix only holds if pilots convert to production. Conversion requires humans on the ground.
The AI companies that win enterprise won't be the ones with the best models. They'll be the ones with the best deployment infrastructure.
π If this insight helped, bookmark it.
β»οΈ Repost to help others stay ahead in tech.
π Follow @TheBeaconAI for curated AI news & deep insights.
https://t.co/lRxr3u2TD3
OpenAI and Microsoft are both sending engineers into your office now
OpenAI launched a deployment company with $4B+ in committed capital. Acquired a consulting firm. Partnered with BCG, McKinsey, Accenture, Capgemini. Now placing engineers directly inside enterprise customers.
Microsoft did the same. EY and Microsoft expanded their alliance with $1B+ over five years, centered on embedded engineers and industry teams.
Two of the most powerful AI companies independently converging on the same conclusion: the bottleneck isn't the model. It's the gap between a working demo and a production system employees actually use.
A 2025 MIT report: ~95% of enterprise generative AI pilots showed no measurable P&L impact. Not because the AI was weak. Because the integration was flawed. The capability was there. The deployment wasn't.
Every consulting deal, every forward-deployed engineer, every system integrator alliance is a direct response to that data point.
Enterprise is already 40%+ of OpenAI's revenue, expected to reach parity with consumer by end of 2026. That mix only holds if pilots convert to production. Conversion requires humans on the ground.
The AI companies that win enterprise won't be the ones with the best models. They'll be the ones with the best deployment infrastructure.
OpenAI and Microsoft are both sending engineers into your office now
OpenAI launched a deployment company with $4B+ in committed capital. Acquired a consulting firm. Partnered with BCG, McKinsey, Accenture, Capgemini. Now placing engineers directly inside enterprise customers.
Microsoft did the same. EY and Microsoft expanded their alliance with $1B+ over five years, centered on embedded engineers and industry teams.
Two of the most powerful AI companies independently converging on the same conclusion: the bottleneck isn't the model. It's the gap between a working demo and a production system employees actually use.
A 2025 MIT report: ~95% of enterprise generative AI pilots showed no measurable P&L impact. Not because the AI was weak. Because the integration was flawed. The capability was there. The deployment wasn't.
Every consulting deal, every forward-deployed engineer, every system integrator alliance is a direct response to that data point.
Enterprise is already 40%+ of OpenAI's revenue, expected to reach parity with consumer by end of 2026. That mix only holds if pilots convert to production. Conversion requires humans on the ground.
The AI companies that win enterprise won't be the ones with the best models. They'll be the ones with the best deployment infrastructure.
https://t.co/gg9GNnKPYD
OpenAI expands Codex beyond coding to target every knowledge worker role
Codex started as a coding agent. That framing is now a liability.
Six new role-specific plugins this week: data analysts, operations teams, researchers. No coding required. The product that began writing functions is now reaching for professional work itself.
Surface read: product expansion. Real read: strategic repositioning under competitive pressure from Claude Code.
When a competitor forces you to accelerate, you have two choices: go deeper into your lane, or argue for a larger one. OpenAI chose the latter.
62 apps. 110 skills. An open ecosystem where partners build their own plugins. That's not a feature list. It's a platform play. Become the operating layer through which professional work gets done.
4 million weekly Codex users are already making slide decks, briefs, and spreadsheets. Well beyond coding.
The moment your AI coding tool is making slide decks for non-technical teams, it's stopped being a coding tool. The plugin launch is the public acknowledgment of a transition already visible in the usage data.
The question isn't whether Codex can serve more roles. It clearly can. The question is whether a product built around software development has the depth to earn trust from finance teams and legal teams.
Expanding the surface area is easy. That part is a different problem entirely.
Anthropic is now extending access Mythos Preview to 150 more organizations
Anthropic's standard approach to powerful AI: restrict what it can do. Project Glasswing is the opposite bet: use the most capable model available to fix critical software before attackers get equivalent tools.
The initial 50 partners found 10,000+ high- or critical-severity vulnerabilities. Anthropic is now extending access to 150 more organizations: power grids, water systems, hospitals, communications infrastructure. Entry criterion: a successful attack on your codebase could affect more than 100 million people.
This isn't a product launch. It's a controlled race against a clock Anthropic set itself. Within 6 to 12 months, the company expects other labs to release models with equivalent cyber capabilities, potentially without safeguards. Glasswing exists to compress the window between "defenders have this" and "everyone has this."
The bottleneck is no longer finding vulnerabilities. Mythos Preview surfaces them faster than human teams can process. The bottleneck is now verification, disclosure, patching, deployment.
The precedent may matter more than the vulnerabilities. Tiered access built around real-world stakes, not commercial availability. That release model is new.
The question: can patching pace outrun proliferation pace? Anthropic is betting a structured head start beats simultaneous release into an unprepared world. Reasonable bet. Untested at this scale.
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Doyan ngentot tante
Seen from Singapore
Anabel Schunke
Seen from Germany
κ§ πeβΞ·γ πΰΈΠΌα΅πΌ κ§π¦ π¬π§
Seen from United Kingdom
awek melayu viral π¦
Seen from Malaysia
Kaan&Eda
Seen from Turkey
binor kesepian
Seen from United States
Ψ―ΩΩΨ§ ΩΩ ΩΩ
Seen from Germany
hiade
Seen from France
Es teh jumbo
Seen from Indonesia
ιΏsirε ζ²Ή
Seen from Germany
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
240.2M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.6M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
108.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
106.9M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.2M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.5M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
86.7M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
80.5M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.1M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.3M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.6M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
68.4M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.4M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
61M followers
X
@x
60.9M followers
CNN Breaking News
@cnnbrk
59.9M followers