Avid gamer and heavily Speculative. I like thinking of game concepts and sampling a plethora of information with interest. Occasionally I get into politics.
@squarepeg3d@ArwensAss@OfficialPCMR And that isn't even getting into the weeds that would be multiplayer/cooperative games, having to balance the games to account for one player playing 'easy' but another playing 'hard' and being able to rectify them having their own custom tailored experience would be a nightmare.
@squarepeg3d@ArwensAss@OfficialPCMR Having an Option of an Easier mode, is a good option. Mandating Developers spend extra time to make an 'easier' mode that goes against what they designed/desired to make isn't a fair ask especially when 3rd Party mods could allow you to adjust it how you feel is best.
@squarepeg3d@OfficialPCMR I am totally fine if a game doesn't have an "Easy Mode" and the Devs want the game to be challenging. However if a game HAS an easy mode, and you choose to play on that mode, I don't think there is anything wrong with that. I don't think we need to force Devs to make "easy" modes
@MetalFoxT This is a right of passage for any artist working with rigs, you always have to jiggle it a little bit and move it. Not only does it let you know if/where you messed up the rigging, but it is also funny and breaks up the frustration of the programs.
@binder89paul@PatriotXV11@ewarren Well all political measures will have some effect on the market. That is the point of prohibiting the purchase or sale during tenure and 2 years after. That way they can't force profiteering, but can definitely screw themselves over by making bad changes that tank their stock.
@binder89paul@PatriotXV11@ewarren I think a better option, would be they have to disclose stock they own prior to taking office, and are forbidden from buying or selling stock during their tenure, and 2 years after. That way if they do good, they can't cash out right away...if they do bad, they just lose money.
@JessicaLHladky I am a Republican, and I plan on voting for Trump. If you want to vote for Harris, then by all means do so, but that doesn't mean you have to be deceptive and give false implications to your spouse and/or partner while doing so. That is the problem that a lot of folks have.
@zdotstudio I would also suggest 'plaster' if you are making a negative, similar to 'slip' molds for clay-making if you are using foam. You could easily replicate the foam process and easily pull it apart and it would be strong enough to hold the 'expansion' with back pressure.
@zdotstudio Foam would be great as the 'final product'. If you are using the print to make the 'negative' in silicone, and then fill the void with foam to make the 'positive' that you wear. You could also experiment with the different foams from them to get a balance between weight and wear
@kunwara_ladkaa@therightram You don't have it write it for you then. I don't see anything wrong with someone who is having some writers block have an AI Generate some suggestions on how to connect two scenes and then using that, write the transition themselves.
@Lana1160662 @IamNoGuitarHero @bradleyrsimpson So, you are asserting that because the police arrested people...that is when people started breaking windows and spray-painting Pro-Palestine messages on walls? Or, is it more likely that people were spray-painting, and breaking windows, which made the university call the police?
@IamNoGuitarHero @bradleyrsimpson It is what happened with all the BLM protests, One protest started, and then the others followed suit, then one got violent, then the rest got violent or started violent when it was first organized, so you ended up with marches that went down avenues breaking all the windows.
@IamNoGuitarHero @bradleyrsimpson Disruptive, and Destructive are two different things. The problem is when the Vandalism starts, it sets a precedent if the police don't act. Because the social movements follow suit, so if one gets away with vandalism, the others start vandalizing too to stay 'unified' in tone.
@laserpaints@Helldiversmedia Even more terrifying....if they catch you, they are gonna fuck you. I expect several "Death by Impact" messages coming if that happens.
@laserpaints@Helldiversmedia That is terrifying, Imagine fighting a faction not only smart enough to recognize you are dropping a big bomb, but strong enough to catch it and throw it at you. Worse yet, rip the random hellbombs out of the map and throw those at you as well.
@Helldivers2HQ I wish that there was a "Demo Range" Where you could use the weapons and grenades in a particular warbond that way you could get a feel for the items in it and see if you actually want them rather than spending loads of time and medals on it only to find out you dislike it.
@xXBrewBEASTXx If an artist makes a species, and wants to draw it? Fine, go ahead. If they can monetize their artworks of it? Great even better. However I think they shouldn't stop people from creating characters or artistic renditions of their own vision of the species as well.
@xXBrewBEASTXx I can understand your point about an artist feeling potentially 'disrespected'. But I am not talking about people who are tracing, or copying the work directly of course. I explicitly said that I disagree with "Closed Species" as a concept, not that artists should get fucked.