@kattnotwilliams As far as I'm aware, there's no law saying these people (who serve the public) have to read/view mean social media posts. Also, no law saying they can't have their email screened. But there is a law saying speech is not illegal. Maybe let's work within our current laws, yeah?
@Docs_Delphi While I appreciate this article, I found it confusing about halfway through, after it stated her Dec 2022 hire date and then later stated she left the office in 2022. Maybe there's some background I'm unaware of here.
@Docs_Delphi@FreeMikeAllen The county prosecutor might not discuss "internal personnel matters," but I have to think there's some type of documentation that could be FOIA'd.
@Thefactsdude Why are courts holding people with power over citizens to a lower standard than those citizens? Obviously, public officials must be held to a higher standard. They don't get brownie points for being public officials - particularly when they already enjoy other inherent benefits.
@kattnotwilliams Exactly! This is the fundamental flaw in the defense argument to ban court cameras. The media will be there & report on the case either way. The cameras allow people an unfiltered view of actual events, thus acting as a check on media reporting, which may be biased or incorrect.
@defense_diaries The information about the ballistics report received wide media coverage before this prelim. I can't agree that it's on "page 40 of a motion nobody will ever read". The DNA contributors issue came up at a prior hearing & will be repeated at trial. There's no cause for alarm, imo.
@Emi72790@defense_diaries@LauraReark I'm not sure how this situation would be different from any other murder-suicide. It's also possible she didn't think she would die.