.@StanfordSteve82@DraftKings Two out of five ain't bad... Oh wait, it is. Continuing to drive bettors to platform that profits on every bet while showing that sports gambling "expert" can't come close to picking consistent winners.
@StanfordSteve82@DKSports .Dang 40% miss the cut. Another parlay misses. You keep driving people to a betting platform that makes profit on every wager while proving that even sports betting "experts" can't profit over time.
@johncanzanobft Have you noticed the new MLB announcer cliche? It used to be "velo:" "Velo this" & Velo that." Now it's"leverage." "Leverage arm," High-leverage pitcher," "Leverage relief appearance." "Leverage at-bat." Got a thesaurus you can loan to these guys?
.@StanfordSteve82 Dang. Tough parlay when 2 of 4 miss cut. You keep driving people to betting platform that profits from every bet, W or L, while proving expert "betting analyst" rarely gets it right.
@StanfordSteve82@DKSportsbook .0 for 4 on men's & women's NCAA finals bets. Ethically problematic when so called sports wagering experts keep driving people to betting platforms (that make profit on each bet) but can't get enough right to make the better a winner. It's so rare that your parlays hit.