Inherently Retarded Chud

YOU are dumber than YOU think you are, sir.

Absurdism • Ultimate Chud • Comedic Retard

My Philosophy of Life?

Don't think

Laughing is better than Dying

[teh_pwnerer @BingBong453761]

Tom is big on accountability but not sympathy (his words). He blamed Blizzard’s lack of name filter on the consumer and then mocked the punishments. He brought all the people to him. So without sympathy he has now been held accountable. I bet he’s so fucking happy right now.

[Inherently Retarded Chud @TheChudRetarded]

It’s been like this all day with these people.

It’s like it’s their first time online, and coming to find out people think differently than them.

And then they just reaffirm that it was never about the names. It’s only to claim moral superiority from those of differing opinion.

[Inherently Retarded Chud @TheChudRetarded]

Facts. Is it like first time being human for these??

If you find your emotions eliciting the response to want to control someone else’s thoughts or speech. It’s like, just say what it is… that words hurt your feelings.

These people can’t get out of their echo chambers, and unfortunately because they are chronically online, they can’t seem to wrap their mind that not everyone puts so much moral allocation to words.

God Grant these overly sensitive gamers the accept the things they can’t control, the courage to change the things they can, and the wisdom to know the difference.

[Inherently Retarded Chud @TheChudRetarded]

@cyberpetxl is the perfect example of people calling for censorship, and claiming the problem were the banned players to begin with.

Claiming moral superiority, but can’t defend or back it up with any reasoning. And the second discourse begins, differencing of opinion starts to happen, you go lock the comments.

Either you admit defeat or admit that differing opinions is the crux of your problems and it’s not some edge lord that had “Deez nutz” and “Thunderballs” in their character name.

[Inherently Retarded Chud @TheChudRetarded]

You have it backwards.

Blizzard is tone deaf just retarded. And should just admit that words on a digital screen are scawwy . They’ve created a crowd of ToS Andy’s that think they can do no wrong, and if anyone complains about it. Well too bad. They can.

You have soy boy faggots who think “illegal migrant” is brutalizing to minorities, but “kirkme intheneck” is comedic genius

You have chronically online simps campaigning for conformity and moderation because words on a screen hurt their feelings.

You have people who have nothing constructive to add to the discussion, but want to announce being morally better/superior than you.

The sensitive Sandy’s who think the best way to improve moderation of language/content is to permaban people with no recourse to dispute or challenge, and can’t think of a superior solution that works for all, like forced name changes, warnings, or chat suspensions.

How hard is it to make a system that allows you to toggle between NSFW and one that filters/stars out all the words/terms you don’t want to see?

Is it hard to imagine That blizzard can make mistakes? Scrutinity, criticism, suggestions and feedback should be encouraged, not shut down.

Lots of you still think content and intent are the same. See published and unpublished as equally harmful. You can’t create disparity between actions that have differing degrees of impact.

[Inherently Retarded Chud @TheChudRetarded]

Right? I fucking cant help when people of differing thought, will take something, like a personal preference, and make it their whole personality.

And it’s like if they don’t agree with my preference or accept my identity, then they are wrong and are the problem with society. I can be whatever I want to be, and if you don’t agree with my world view, then you should be treated with all the disrespect in the world because you’re subhuman who can’t accept someone who can be who they want to be.

Like if you’re not going to agree with my worldview then I’m left with no option. And have to find a way to cancel you out of society. Because I’m a good person. I accept everyome. Im inclusive. I would NEVER be like those chud lifeless gamers.

Too bad not everyone’s like me. I know how to do everything the right way.

[Inherently Retarded Chud @TheChudRetarded]

What are you arguing here sir?

Have to hear a bunch of opinions that differ from your opinion?

Oh boo, poor soul, how are you going to survive? what shall you ever do?

Someone quick. Come save him with an affirming opinion, his constitution is weakening from online forces never before seen.

[Inherently Retarded Chud @TheChudRetarded]

Little ToS soy boy hall monitor here wants you guys to play in his fantasy reality world where definitions and meaning is shaped by his reasoning, which is morally superior to yours.

He wants you to know that you are not a victim because you gave up that right the moment you said a word he didnt like to hear

And just to help refreshen you on what censorship is - censorship is the suppression or prohibition of speech, writing, images, or other expression deemed objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or inconvenient by a government, institution, platform, or other authority

You’re absolutely right - prohibiting speech deemed sensitive by blizzard, and enforcing censorship via a speech filter is what blizzard SHOULD have done.

No instead blizzard completely maas permabanned 20-30k players, offering no recourse or avenue to dispute or appeal. While at the same time their devs are morally condemning them on social media and telling them to be better people.

And because it’s a snowflakes like you who need reality to morph to your worldview and abide by your moral standards. And we get it, you value conformity and censorship over risk and open debate, staying inside your echo chamber, it feels “safe”.

conversations like this will run circles forever because of youll never debate the substance with supporting evidence and sensible reasoning, but just by claiming moral high ground.

[Inherently Retarded Chud @TheChudRetarded]

@MalakaiAnon @SayaNoComputa @jakeblennings “I game way harder and longer than you, which makes me the expert on morality”

Thinking that you’re investment into gaming qualifies you on what is moral vs not is what’s really laughable

[Inherently Retarded Chud @TheChudRetarded]

People like you I swear intentionally misinterpret some of the complaints from people who are banned.

Players who characters that were deleted, unplayed, or never intended to make it past loading screen were treated the same as those who did. Both are have completely different impacts, yet being treated as the same.

Or explain to me why “Deez Nutz” and “Thunderballs” hold the same offense as a racial slur? Yet people with “Kirkme inneck” are freely roaming around, enjoying the game? Who’s making that decision.

So unless you’re supporting terrible moderation practices, you’re just downplaying actual concerns and feedback, and muddying the conversation to signal your virtue and that you’re a morally good person.

[yeet @Awk20000]

Asmongold reveals how he would deal with Reddit

"If I was Trump, I would just sign an executive order that takes away Reddit's Section 230. And it wouldn't hold in court and it would obviously get appealed, but it would tank their stock price and destroy their company"

"As soon as a judge appealed it..I'd just write another one, slightly different..and then you also remove the judge..the process is the punishment..unless they decided to adhere to a free speech doctrine. And if they didn't do that, I would just write infinite more legislation and executive orders and then go after and investigate them..I will put an end to this in like 5 seconds"

[Inherently Retarded Chud @TheChudRetarded]

Honestly the only thing I see in this post is someone who need to virtue to the world that they are a morally good person and expert curator for gaming communities that they have never played.

Sure make fun of Chuds for getting emotional, but you’re the one letting their complaints take away the experience of trying new things. I’d argue if there’s anyone letting things they can’t control get to them, it’s you.

[Inherently Retarded Chud @TheChudRetarded]

You have it backwards.

Blizzard is tone deaf just retarded. And should just admit that words on a digital screen are scawwy . They’ve created a crowd of ToS Andy’s that think they can do no wrong, and if anyone complains about it. Well too bad. They can.

You have soy boy faggots who think “illegal migrant” is brutalizing to minorities, but “kirkme intheneck” is comedic genius

You have chronically online simps campaigning for conformity and moderation because words on a screen hurt their feelings.

You have people who have nothing constructive to add to the discussion, but want to announce being morally better/superior than you.

The sensitive Sandy’s who think the best way to improve moderation of language/content is to permaban people with no recourse to dispute or challenge, and can’t think of a superior solution that works for all, like forced name changes, warnings, or chat suspensions.

How hard is it to make a system that allows you to toggle between NSFW and one that filters/stars out all the words/terms you don’t want to see?

Is it hard to imagine That blizzard can make mistakes? Scrutinity, criticism, suggestions and feedback should be encouraged, not shut down.

Lots of you still think content and intent are the same. See published and unpublished as equally harmful. You can’t create disparity between actions that have differing degrees of impact.

[Inherently Retarded Chud @TheChudRetarded]

Oh yeah, or like the people super edgy people with “Deez Nutz”

Do you know how unplayable the game would be if I had to see “Deez Nutz” show up in my whispers channel???

Ugh I don’t even want to imagine how much therapy that would create.

Us, super mature adults could never imagine thinking such BAD words. Like WAY over the top. Like imagine how bad the game is if we had to see words that WE DEEM offensive.

Blizzard here again to save day. ☝️🤓

[Inherently Retarded Chud @TheChudRetarded]

The best part about David’s logic, is that there is none.

His debate style is not using facts. But rather an arsenal of personal opinions backed with extremely weak evidence.

Once you find out that he thinks people that got banned are Nazi incels. Davids greatest strength is revealed. But I can’t tell if it’s Willfully or in willfully ignorant hypocrisy. But damn.

David’s the type of guy who will lecture someone’s speech in the name of being more inclusive, but can’t see how censoring someone else’s speech in practice is an act of being exclusive to speech they don’t like.

[Inherently Retarded Chud @TheChudRetarded]

@dmachine52 @Inkog0 @groovy_pioneer Holy tone deaf.

You lecture people on morals that you don’t hold for yourself.

Rather than maybe taking in what people are saying, double down on remaining inconsistent.

The rules for thee but not for me have some CRAZY ways of lacking any sentience. I swear.

[Inherently Retarded Chud @TheChudRetarded]

Like here’s a good example as to why your logic is flawed.

1. There should be no reason, as a player, to advocate for inconsistent reasoning.
2. Thinking Blizzard flawlessly made perfect bans across the board, all at once, so no questions asked. No further debate or discussion.
3. Shutting down feedback or thinking those who were banned should be automatically ignored is not allowing open discourse, but shuts it down.
4. Black/white thinking weakens reasoning - thinking blizz=good, players banned = bad

I don’t see why you would care either. Unless you want to dispute any of my previous claims about or the original posters critism, you’re just shit talking and proving nothing

[Inherently Retarded Chud @TheChudRetarded]

Your inability to see how arguing “because they can” doesn’t strengthen their reasoning, rather it makes it weaker.

I’d rather a company never moderate with the moral reasoning of “because tos. You agreed. And I can”. And I don’t imagine you would either.

People like you aren’t standing on any principles arguing the legal rights of what they can do vs can’t do.

Like for example, could you explain what the difference between an unplayed created character with a bad name versus a played character with the same bad name? Could you stay morally consistent, arguing the punishments should be the same despite their difference’s in outcomes?

[Inherently Retarded Chud @TheChudRetarded]

@Asmongold @WoWForeverMemes @Joh_Burg @asha_shar @ChrisMetzen I was shocked to see a post that morally condemn and shames a crowd of their player base, while also in the same breath, boasting about being a huge contributor of their removal at the same time.

[Inherently Retarded Chud @TheChudRetarded]

@Asmongold @WoWForeverMemes @Joh_Burg @asha_shar @ChrisMetzen I don’t know how your try to morally condemn a crowd while boasting about being the removal of if at the same time, and think “yep. I’ll post this”

[Inherently Retarded Chud @TheChudRetarded]

@Addicted10152 @pwave_studios Bro, if you’re gunna hop into more of my comment threads, you should at least come prepared to debate me. Otherwise are going to get pummeled with pure reasoning and logic.