There’s something almost poetic about Manchester City’s refusal to see what is right in front of them. They already have their anchor, their number six, their midfield metronome in Nico González — yet somehow, they continue searching elsewhere for the next £100 million solution. Look back at December: Nico started seven consecutive matches as City went on a magnificent winning run, beating Leeds, Fulham, Sunderland, Real Madrid, Crystal Palace, Brentford, West Ham and Nottingham Forest — eight straight victories in all competitions. (FB Ref) He wasn’t merely filling Rodri’s shoes; he was growing into the role, controlling the tempo, winning duels and giving the midfield the balance it had been crying out for. Then came January, the injury, and suddenly the rhythm disappeared. Guardiola himself once called him “mini-Rodri”, and yet City now find themselves looking beyond him, flirting with expensive replacements for a position where the answer may already be sitting in their own squad. Nico has never asked to be the next £100 million signing — he’s simply asking to be trusted. Sometimes, the most expensive mistake is overlooking what you already own.
I never said I’m not supporting City anymore. I’ve only ever really known Pep as the manager of my club in my lifetime — I was too young to properly remember the Pellegrini era. You naturally get emotionally attached to certain players and managers, and this is literally just a post reminiscing about some of the players we used to have. It’s not that deep 😂
I never said I’m not supporting City anymore. I’ve only ever really known Pep as the manager of my club in my lifetime — I was too young to properly remember the Pellegrini era. You naturally get emotionally attached to certain players and managers, and this is literally just a post reminiscing about some of the players we used to have. It’s not that deep 😂
@yrmluciano Being nostalgic over the best city team in my life makes me think this club is a joke ? Do one you prick im literally just reminiscing where in the post did I say man city football club is a joke
@nicemachu Being nostalgic over a certain period of dominance for my club = being plastic . Nice one mate. Where in the post did I say I’m not supporting city anymore . Fuck off
@jguugs When the fuck did I say I checked out you twat 🤣🤣, it’s okay to be nostalgic over a certain period of dominance , I’ll support this club in any situation
To anyone wondering what Marescas system is and how it would actually work at Manchester city , here it is. The main difference is his back 3 system , which is extremely specialized and only a handful of players actually get the hang of it- which is my main worry. It only works if everyone knows the system with their eyes closed.
Maresca’s 3-2-4-1
Donnarumma
Khusanov — Guehi — Gvardiol
Nunes — Anderson
Semenyo — Enzo — Bouaddi — Doku
Haaland
The build-up is the exciting part. Donnarumma gives City an extra man against the press, allowing the CBs to split wide while Guehi holds the centre. Gvardiol can step into midfield with the ball, while Nunes/Anderson form the double pivot. If the opposition presses the 3, Donnarumma becomes the free man; if they press him, City can play through the midfield or directly into Haaland.
Higher up, Doku and Semenyo stay extremely wide, stretching the back four and creating 1v1s. Enzo and Bouaddi occupy the half-spaces, constantly offering third-man combinations. Gvardiol stepping forward can create overloads on the left, while Nunes can invert on the right to support Semenyo and Enzo.
The key is Haaland pinning the CBs. With the wingers holding width and the 8s between the lines, defenders are forced into impossible decisions: step to Enzo/Bouaddi and leave Haaland space, or stay deep and allow the midfielders to turn.
Maresca’s Leicester averaged 61.6% possession and conceded only 41 goals in 46 league games, while his Chelsea side averaged 56.7% possession in 24/25. His teams are built around creating numerical/positional superiority rather than simply keeping the ball.
The biggest flaw is transition defence. If Nunes/Anderson are caught ahead of the ball, the back three can suddenly defend huge spaces. Against deep blocks, there’s also a danger of becoming too structured and predictable if Enzo/Bouaddi don’t break lines.Furthermore , khusanov has to adapt to being a right sided center back in a back 3 , without the cover of Nunes on a lot of occasions. What are your thoughts .
To anyone wondering what Marescas system is and how it would actually work at Manchester city , here it is. The main difference is his back 3 system , which is extremely specialized and only a handful of players actually get the hang of it- which is my main worry. It only works if everyone knows the system with their eyes closed.
Maresca’s 3-2-4-1
Donnarumma
Khusanov — Guehi — Gvardiol
Nunes — Anderson
Semenyo — Enzo — Bouaddi — Doku
Haaland
The build-up is the exciting part. Donnarumma gives City an extra man against the press, allowing the CBs to split wide while Guehi holds the centre. Gvardiol can step into midfield with the ball, while Nunes/Anderson form the double pivot. If the opposition presses the 3, Donnarumma becomes the free man; if they press him, City can play through the midfield or directly into Haaland.
Higher up, Doku and Semenyo stay extremely wide, stretching the back four and creating 1v1s. Enzo and Bouaddi occupy the half-spaces, constantly offering third-man combinations. Gvardiol stepping forward can create overloads on the left, while Nunes can invert on the right to support Semenyo and Enzo.
The key is Haaland pinning the CBs. With the wingers holding width and the 8s between the lines, defenders are forced into impossible decisions: step to Enzo/Bouaddi and leave Haaland space, or stay deep and allow the midfielders to turn.
Maresca’s Leicester averaged 61.6% possession and conceded only 41 goals in 46 league games, while his Chelsea side averaged 56.7% possession in 24/25. His teams are built around creating numerical/positional superiority rather than simply keeping the ball.
The biggest flaw is transition defence. If Nunes/Anderson are caught ahead of the ball, the back three can suddenly defend huge spaces. Against deep blocks, there’s also a danger of becoming too structured and predictable if Enzo/Bouaddi don’t break lines.Furthermore , khusanov has to adapt to being a right sided center back in a back 3 , without the cover of Nunes on a lot of occasions. What are your thoughts .