DANSEY

Practice Leader | RN | Turning chaos into results, coffee into strategy, and teams into powerhouses. Big on grit, loyalty, laughter, and getting it done

[DANSEY @TheCuriousAngle]

@FoldARPrez @FoldARPrez Agreed. At some point, facts, accountability, and documented truth matter more than narratives and retaliation. Respectfully standing your ground while remaining composed says far more than the accusations being thrown around.

[DANSEY @TheCuriousAngle]

@JodyChaseTN

[DANSEY @TheCuriousAngle]

@AmyScotlands @RealCandaceO the hair LOL

[DANSEY @TheCuriousAngle]

@TheBabylonBibi @LauraLoomer the world knows she is

[DANSEY @TheCuriousAngle]

@Hannayyy12 @RealCandaceO I did indeed LOL

[Ana Escobar @AnaEscobarShow]

I’ve never been so excited for Candace and Baron tbh

[ELIZABETH LANE @imelizabethlane]

Humans come in all shapes and sizes. Some are intelligent, some are stupid and some are genuinely malicious. People disagree about politics, religion, morality, and almost everything else, but there is one principle every sane person should understand: when someone is being attacked from every direction, especially by people they never attacked in the first place, you should at least stop and ask why? What is going on here?

If I punch someone in the face and they punch me back, the responsibility starts with me because I initiated the conflict. That is simple cause and effect. But if random groups of people suddenly start attacking me when I never attacked them in the first place and their only justification is that I questioned an organization or its leadership because I believe they are not being fully honest then any rational person should immediately start asking questions.

Why are these people so emotionally invested? Are they ideologically driven, financially motivated, coordinated behind the scenes, or simply acting in the interests of the same network of people? Otherwise, why would they aggressively attack someone who never attacked them personally? Especially in a country where personal conflict is avoided like the plague and passive-aggressiveness is in fashion. Why would they deliberately seek out personal conflict when they seemingly have no dog in the fight?

That is basic logic. So why is Candace Owens being attacked by people she never attacked? Even someone with minimal common sense should be asking that question. And this is after she was fired, her friend was killed and somehow she’s the one attacked for what exactly?

Having a show in which she asks questions most Americans would like to ask the leadership of this country? Is that what triggers these people? The answer is - YES! They are triggered by people who ask difficult questions.

Why would a popular host like her, someone Americans genuinely enjoy listening to and support (a fact based on numbers), be attacked by a handful of weird individuals in a very coordinated manner? Popularity and public support are measured by numbers, and numbers usually reflect one important metric: honesty! Ben Shapiro learned that the hard way. So why is it that a host who is so obviously supported by the public still gets relentlessly attacked by certain people?

Their excuse is always the same: “Erika Kirk was attacked, so now we’re attacking Candace.” Suddenly the same people who excuse corruption, hypocrisy, defend genocide in Gaza and institutional failure at every opportunity have discovered a moral conscience overnight. Now they present themselves as noble defenders of justice and protectors of Erika Kirk.

Amazing! Candace Owens apparently performs miracles. She somehow transformed some of the worlds’ most cynical and self-interested people into passionate warriors for morality and for this widow Erika! People who would normally destroy others for the sake of self-preservation and have done so before, are suddenly deeply concerned about someone else’s well-being.

Or maybe the explanation is far simpler: these people are connected, coordinated, and protecting the same interests behind the scenes, the same entrenched elites. That explanation makes far more sense doesn't it?

Let’s be clear about something important: Candace Owens did not accuse anyone of murder. She asked questions and tried to connect the dots when nothing made sense. That is all. And I have to say she is much nicer than I am. If someone murder my best friend and then some group of people started attacking me for wanting to find out what happened to my friend - asking questions and connecting the dots would be the least of their worries. I'm not as nice as Candace.

Candace Owens never accused Brian Harpole of killing Charlie Kirk, at least not to my knowledge, yet Brian Harpole is suing her for defamation. Defamation means making false statements that damage someone’s reputation. Brian Are you sure it was Candace who damaged your reputation? Or maybe it had something to do with your shortcomings when the person you were protecting was killed? Maybe that’s when people started seeing you as an incompetent ass?

So where/what exactly was the false statement Candace made? Asking whether security failed at an event where the person being protected ended up dead is that the statement? That can not possibly be ground for defamation, it is a completely reasonable question because security failed Charlie is dead!!!

What was Brian Harpole’s job? His job was to protect Charlie Kirk. Was Charlie Kirk protected that day? No. Charlie Kirk is dead. You f***g moron you and entire team miserably failed at your jobs that is why Charlie is dead. That is not an opinion. That is an undeniable fact the guy you were supposed to protect is dead! Or maybe we are missing something and you were not tasked with Charlie's protection at all? Maybe you were there to dance ballet before the event even started. I don’t know, am I missing something here? please educate us!

If the person you were assigned to protect dies under your watch, then the security failed. PERIOD! That failure may not mean murder, but he is dead because of the failure! That is true in every country, every language, and every functioning reality!

And this is where the lawsuit becomes absurd. A man whose protection team failed and got Charlie killed is now suing a podcaster because she questioned whether security at the event was handled properly. Think about how irrational that is.

Brian, if you ever wanted to restore credibility or be taken seriously again professionally, as a body guard the correct action would have been very different. You should have gone on Shawn Ryan’s show and apologized to the American people and to Charlie’s family for the failures in security detail that day. That is what accountability looks like.

Instead, you chose lawsuits and public attacks. And now, rather than being remembered as someone who took responsibility after a tragedy, you will be remembered as the bodyguard who failed at his job and then sued one of Charlie’s friends for questioning it. That is the legacy you are creating for yourself.

[DANSEY @TheCuriousAngle]

@leahfiles It's about time @leahfiles! Keep up the great work you do! Here to support always!

[DANSEY @TheCuriousAngle]

@RealCandaceO

I’m really sorry you’re carrying this, it sounds incredibly heavy. Grief can bring up so many “what ifs,” but that doesn’t mean you failed him. Sometimes we only understand things in hindsight, and that doesn’t take away the love or the connection you had. Be gentle with yourself. What you’re feeling comes from love, and that’s something he would have known. You don’t have to carry all of this alone🤍 CHRIST IS KING!

[DANSEY @TheCuriousAngle]

@RealCandaceO @RealCandaceO @candaceoshow DONE!

[DANSEY @TheCuriousAngle]

@imelizabethlane @MrsErikaKirk So eloquently put

[DANSEY @TheCuriousAngle]

Amen. What a powerful reminder of who we are and what we are called to be. Through Baptism we are made new, and through Confirmation we are strengthened to stand firm in faith, to witness boldly, and to live in truth. May the Holy Spirit guide and sustain us as we take up this spiritual battle with Christ.

[DANSEY @TheCuriousAngle]

@LionelMedia Per usual!

[Ivan Raiklin @IvanRaiklin]

D.E.I.-Dazzling, Eloquent, Influential

[DANSEY @TheCuriousAngle]

I’m not impressed-standing ovations aren’t a measure of truth, they’re a measure of crowd mood.

Candace being alone in a studio just means she’s doing the work—no script, no hype squad, no applause breaks. Erika getting a standing ovation? Great… that’s called performing for an audience.

One is focused on the message. The other is focused on fakeness and the reaction.

[DANSEY @TheCuriousAngle]

@baroncoleman SOON it will be TOP 10!

[🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸 @LionelMedia]

If @RealCandaceO and Laura Loomer were to meet in a formal debate, it would certainly be a most fascinating confrontation. Owens is widely recognized for her composure, rhetorical precision and ability to structure arguments in a clear and persuasive way, often grounding her points in specific examples most usually the result of painstakingly brutal research. Loomer, by contrast, is known for a more incoherent-cum-confrontational and demented style fueled by scattered rage that will most certainly and quickly escalate to detached hysteria. A man can dream.
https://t.co/EYinQjqrdw

[Ginny Robinson @ImGinnyRobinson]

Larry hates you because you actually matter.

[DANSEY @TheCuriousAngle]

@RealCandaceO @titoamboy CAN'T FIX STUPID