Bu haftanın yazısı sanayisizleşme üzerine..
2026’nın ilk çeyreğinde imalat sanayisinin GSYH içindeki payı yüzde 14.9’a geriledi
İmalat sanayisi durgunlaşıp toplam ekonomik faaliyet içindeki ağırlığı azalırken istihdam yaratma kapasitesi de zayıflıyor
לצה"ל אין מושג מה יהיה מחר או בעוד שבוע. אך למרות זאת הא ממשיך להפיץ תחזיות קודרות של "הערכות מודעיניות", שמפומפמות לערוצים שממש נהנים לדווח שוב ושוב לציבור כי אוטוטו תהיה בקרוב מלחמה גדולה. קצת צניעות. תגידו שאתם לא יודעים ואל תסתפקו בכוכבית מוצנעת של זה הכל תלוי בטראמפ. חלאס אנחנו יודעים את זה.
@cigdemtoker yazısı anlamlı. Fakat ülkemizde siber güvenlik yeterince tartışılmadığı için kavramı bilmeyen ve yeterince anlamayan bir topluluğun, bir anda kinetik güvenliği siber dünyadan ayırması güç.
“Dijital tahakküm” mü, “bütüncül siber güvenlik” mi? https://t.co/5os8BdO3hd
Geleceğin savaşlarında hedef yalnızca ordular olmayacak. Kamuoyunun güvenini, karar alma iradesini ve toplumsal dayanışmayı zayıflatabilen bilişsel saldırılar, NATO'nun en kritik sınavlarından olacak. NATO ne yapmalı? | Prof. Dr. Salih Bıçakcı yazdı.
https://t.co/vee1lFqcv7
בגלל נתניהו חלק ממשתפי מבצע אנטבה שמלאו לו 50 שנים החליטו להחרים את הטקס. כך כתב אלוף ר׳אמ״ן אורי שגיא: ״ מוצא לנכון לעדכנכם שהלוחמים שהשתתפו במבצע אנטבה לפני 50 שנה הוזמנו לבית הנשיא בחסותו ובחסות ראש הממשלה לטקס לציון הארוע. החלטתי, בעצה אחת עם מתן וילנאי ותמיר פרדו (קצין הקשר של יוני נתניהו במבצע) שלא להשתתף עם מוביל ההשתמטות ושאר מרעין בישין שבודאי ינאם על גבורות ישראל. אגב, צוות ההשתלטות של סיירת מטכ"ל והפצוע קשה גיבור ישראל סורין הרשקו שותפים להחלטה. צר לי עד למאד אבל זה צו מצפוני״.
NATO’nun yapay zekâyla ilgili sorunu ne? Ağ bağlantılı bir savaş durumunda NATO’nun riskleri neler, İttifak üyelerini risklere karşı nasıl hazırlamalı? NATO YZ konusunda ne yapmalı? | Prof. Salih Bıçakcı yazdı.
https://t.co/CIybh4Xc1M
Netanyahu's government has passed a decision to recognize the Armenian Genocide. It is a welcome step. However It is unfortunate that this has happened only now, after a delay of many decades. This was due in part to Israel's desire to regard the Holocaust as a unique genocide, because of the interests of successive Israeli governments, which sold weapons to Turkey, maintained intelligence ties with it and feared feared provoking President Erdoğan's anger.
Greenspan sonrası merkez bankacılığı tartışması ve Türkiye..
Fiyat istikrarı yalnızca faiz politikasıyla değil, üretim yapısını dönüştüren, dışa bağımlılığı azaltan ve gelir dağılımını gözeten kapsamlı bir kalkınma stratejisiyle birlikte düşünülmeli
https://t.co/TIxaMsU8kb
Israel’s Ministerial Committee on Legislation has advanced a draft bill that would bar graduates of the medical faculties of Al-Quds and An-Najah Universities from practicing medicine in Israel.
The explanatory memorandum is troubling, for what it does not say. It does not allege deficiencies in academic standards. It does not question the competence of Palestinian citizens of Israel who graduate from these institutions. Rather, it asserts that exposure to expressions of support for terrorism renders such graduates morally incapable of providing impartial medical care.
As a medical professional who has worked alongside physicians trained at both universities, I have seen no evidence to support such a claim. I have encountered competent, dedicated professionals committed to the ethical obligations of medicine, treating patients without distinction as to nationality or political belief.
As an international lawyer, I reject legislation founded on collective political prejudice and racial discrimination. A measure that excludes individuals because of where they studied and who they are presumed to be, breaches the most basic principles of equality before the law.
Israel remains a party to the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination which requires States Parties to prohibit and bring to an end racial discrimination "by any persons, group or organization", including through legislation. Laws that single out a particular national group for adverse treatment, absent any individualized assessment, are impossible to reconcile with that obligation.
The issue is not medical competence. The bill itself concedes as much. The issue is whether a State that alleges commitment to the international rule of law can lawfully presume bias or moral deficiency on the basis of national origin and educational affiliation. International law gives a clear answer. It cannot.