Are the following morally acceptable?
🟦Abortion
🟦Physician-assisted suicide
🟦Homosexuality
🟦Changing one’s gender
🟦Pornography
🟩Divorce
🟦Birth control
🟦Pre-marital sex
🟨Polygamy (🟦Polyandry 🟥Polygyny)
🟩Gambling
🟨Death penalty
🟩Medical testing on animals
🟦Cloning
Are the following morally acceptable?
⬜️ Abortion
⬜️ Physician-assisted suicide
⬜️ Homosexuality
⬜️ Changing one’s gender
⬜️ Pornography
⬜️ Divorce
⬜️ Birth control
⬜️ Pre-marital sex
⬜️ Polygamy
⬜️ Gambling
⬜️ Death penalty
⬜️ Medical testing on animals
⬜️ Cloning
The vast majority of crimes against children are from their own parents. The internet is THE escape for those kids. It's their only safe place. ID/Age verification laws remove that safe place. All while destroying freedom of speech and privacy for everyone.
Insane. It even fails as an incentive for men to quit dragging their feet & propose; they’re more likely not to commit at all.
Instead, just ban birth control. Women will reassert their role as gatekeepers of sex, demand men marry them for access to their bodies, & men will step up (after grumbling).
Everyone will be happier. Nature is quite good to us when we don’t mutilate her.
Google is building a feature called "Audio Memory" for Pixel phones.
What it does: runs as a permanent background service that listens to everything around your phone. Music and "important conversations" all day, every day.
What Google says: all processing stays on-device. Nothing goes to their servers.
What Google hasn't said:
→ How long is audio or transcripts stored on your device?
→ Is this opt-in or on by default?
→ Can any of it sync to Google services later?
→ What happens if police seize your phone?
It hasn't shipped yet, but it was found hidden in Pixel 10 code. But it's coming.
Your phone already knows where you go, what you search, and who you message. Soon it may also remember every conversation you have near it.
Canada's new "cyber-security" law lets the government collect your subscriber info, location data, browsing history, and metadata with no warrant and no judge, then share it across federal agencies.
The fact you all are echoing the same words as the UK "Think of the Children" to force this through says everything about your intentions
People are not blind and see what's going on within the UK and EU right now. This is just a way to invade privacy and introduce censorship
Here’s the roll call of members of Congress who betrayed the Constitution and the American people by voting yes on the KIDS Act.
The sickest part is that these people used “protecting kids” as an excuse to further insert government between parents and their children—all while establishing a surveillance infrastructure to monitor and control Americans of all ages.
The U.S just passed the "KIDS Act" in the House with no pushback. Both political sides were in agreeance that your privacy on the internet does not matter anymore. They are using the same words as the UK with "Protect Kids" to push this. https://t.co/wl32gvcDs9
Framing here is absolutely insane. "Get the right" as if this isn't just a liability imposed on people who have spent too much time with the wrong person. You're basically getting all the obligations of marriage with none of the benefits.
I am happy so many people are now talking about the "KIDS Act" to spread awareness
Appreciate everyone standing up to keep the internet free. Also thank you everyone that has been sharing my video about it today
A new U.S. bill called the KIDS Act is facing pushback from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), which says it could require age verification on many websites and apps.
If the bill becomes law, people may have to prove their age before using some online services, possibly by showing a government ID or other verification.
The EFF says this could make it harder to stay private online and could push websites to remove or limit more content to avoid legal issues.
https://t.co/CbXV6AbUFU
The internet could change if the U.S. House passes the KIDS Act today to "protect children." Critics warn it could mean de facto age checks for everyone and weakened encrypted communications.
The KIDS Act is a package of around a dozen bills that pairs a revised Kids Online Safety Act with new age-verification, AI chatbot, and messaging rules.
Digital rights group EFF warns the design would pressure platforms to age-check all users, not just minors, since liability can attach when a service "should have known" a user's age, and flags new rules touching encrypted and disappearing messages. Sponsors Brett Guthrie (R) and Frank Pallone (D) say it's kids-safety protection and note KOSA's text says age verification isn't required.
Being a stay at home wife/mother is even seen by some (feminists in particular) as a job in and of itself, "unpaid labour" bla bla bla
But it seems all of that screeching flies out the window as soon as roles reverse. Then the man is a waste, a deadbeat, a soon-to-be-ex
This must be a skit, otherwise it is very telling how people are calling him worthless and judging him, when millions of women refuse to work while their husbands pull down 2 full time jobs and no one bats an eye at them
Stay at home wife = fine
Stay at home husband = bad