@TaylorLoy Unfortunately it’s a result of our Wesleyan Methodist heritage. JW didn’t have much of a theology of baptism. Just assented to his dad’s views and then emphasized the new birth. Different story for LS tho.
@chad_bowen@RevBruceCase@feljr I agree! If not all of them were baptised. I don't deny it but I don't think baptism is the sole sacrament that constitutes the church. I think it's the Eucharist.
@RevBruceCase@feljr@chad_bowen I agree. Wesley (like others in the revival) emphasised baptism of the HS. He didn't write much on baptism - generally. If you find the source for that quote, pls share!
@chad_bowen Right, my point being w/o sacraments, there is no constitution of Church. But with the sacraments, worship by Word & Table, and liturgy therein, all is present to const. Church
@chad_bowen there is no gathered Church, only the remnant established Church. Only the form of Church without the function. Sacraments constitute Church.
@chad_bowen And that's where I disagree. Hot take, I know. The historic definition of what constitutes Church: fellowship of believers worships God, Word is proclaimed, sacraments duly administered. How often do Congregations dismiss the last feature? I'd say w/o the Lords Supper
@chad_bowen I agree and you seem to distinguish participation and incorporation from the function of the Eucharist & Baptism. I.e. Participation & incorporation. Am I miss-reading?