Rashmika Mandanna cooked unemployed feminist girls.
She said she's obsessed with her man, and it's her choice.
She loves Vijay, and she's happy.
Unemployed feminist aunties should stop worrying about other people's relationships.
Rashmika Mandanna is happy with Vijay Deverakonda.
But feminist girls aren't happy because she had to propose to him.
But the same girls support Deepika Padukone, who said she was seeing other men while in a relationship with Ranveer Singh.
Why these double standards?
Men and women are equal.
Why do they think it's degrading for a woman to propose?
Ranveer Singh: A simp, cuck, submissive, and betabuxer who married Deepika, does all sorts of chivalrous acts, and in return gets treated like a miserable human being. Deepika couldn’t even let their daughters carry on his surname and doesn’t even respect him.
Vijay Deverakonda: A narcissistic Chad who made Rashmika beg him 100 times to marry her. He maintains control over Rashmika, doesn’t engage in any sort of chivalry, and behaves like a man who leads. Despite all this, he gets respected by Rashmika.
There’s a lesson here, and it’s very simple.
> made her beg 100 times
> gives her stare to control her narrative
> says he'll cheat if felt unloved
> will probably divorce her after having kids
jhukti hai jeetas jhukane wala chahiye
>Be Vijay Deverakonda.
>A narcissistic male Chad
>Doesn’t even follow his wife on Instagram
>Doesn’t do chivalry
>Made Rashmika beg him 100 times for marriage
>Gives her that stare to control her narrative
>Says he’ll cheat if he feels unloved
>Rashmika loves and respects him even more
An inspiration, a Giga Chad, and a tight slap in the face for internet simps and male feminists who think simping & chivalry is going to earn them respect from women.