The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.
Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.
Cambridge gunman ID'd: Tyler Brown
In 2020, he fired upon police officers, but Judge Janet Sanders gave him 5 years of prison. FIVE!
He has a 20-year criminal record.
Now THIS is how you kick off a news conference at the Department of Health and Human Services:
"Men are men. Men can never become women. Women are women. Women can never become men. Children are innocent and they need our protection."
Wow. The Democrats caved just a couple days after the elections?? Almost seems like they were using the government shut down, and those being hurt by it as a political tool?? 🤔🤔
🚨 BREAKING: JD Vance just said it PERFECTLY on the federal shutdown
"This is how a CHILD BEHAVES!"
"They are trying to take a hostage. IF WE DO THAT - give them everything they want? In 3 MONTHS, they are gonna shut down the aviation industry and deny SNAP unless you give us exactly what you want!"
"That is NOT how a responsible governing party behaves in the United States of America."
“Right now, the closest comp Shedeur has in sports to like how to maybe best conduct myself given the extra spotlight and my spot on the depth chart is Bronny James… Bronny has done the exact opposite of all of this.”
@getnickwright explains:
That new Netflix documentary where the girl is getting just horrific text messages from a random number and it turns out to be her mom has ruined TV for me. I don’t think I’ll ever be as entertained again. I haven’t laughed so hard in a while. It’s a must watch
I get leaving a country for the sake of you and your family trying to find a better life. I even get trying to circumvent the system to do so if you feel it necessary . However, when you’re in the country you fled to, and flying the flag of the country you fled from….