I pity the men who voted for this idiot politician.
If a mother is becoming one before the age of 18, that means she was a child bride.
So why aren’t her parents being prosecuted?
Child marriage is a crime, right?
Then what exactly is this politician trying to promote — marrying girls off before 18 and then rewarding their families?
What kind of message is this?
#ChildMarriage #Accountability
Motherhood is the easiest job in marriage. ANY BODY can do it.
Women run day care centers wirh 10-20 kids daily.
A maid who can't even speak English and has never had a kid in her life can do it 10x better than mothers.
Single fathers raise the BEST generation of kids. The stats don't lie.
Now go try to HIRE someone to be a provider. Go find someone to pay 100% or 80% of your bills for 20 years, buy you a house, buy you a car, protect you at night.
You can't. Because NOBODY wants that job. That's why women beg for marriage than men.
Marriage is about DUTY, not happiness. That's why they read you the vows so you understand clearly what it means:
"In sickness and in health till death do us part."
It never said "till I'm unhappy." It never mentioned happiness once.
women had the EASIER job in marriage. The older kids get, the LESS stressful your job gets. A 10 year old can wash plates. A 15 year old can cook. Your job gets easier every year.
Fathers don't have that privilege. Bills don't get reduced. Bills don't stop. Rent goes UP. School fees go UP. Food goes UP. His job gets HARDER every year.
That's why men die of heart attack and high blood pressure more than women. That's why there are more WIDOWS than widowers. Your "suffering" lets you live to 90. His "privilege" puts him in the grave at 60. Women's job is easier. Period.
Overheard on the metro: A girl said her partner wants to marry her because she’s pregnant, but she’s opting for an abortion instead because she "isn't sure about a future with him."
It really makes you question why people enter intimate relationships without any clarity or sense of commitment toward their partner.
The court grants divorce to husband on the basis of wife's cruelty.
But, still the wife walks away with hefty alimony.
Where's the justice?
Numerous judgements in recent months.
> Wife commits adultery
> Wife has a child with another man
> Wife deserts the husband over minor things
> Wife files false criminal case
> Wife abuses/beats the husband
The court grants divorce to the husband, but also grants maintenance or alimony to the wife. And then, the man is expected to celebrate that judgement and be happy about it. How? Why?
Even though he wins the divorce case, he still loses his hard earned wealth, for no fault of his.
Is that fair?
Why don't the feminists and women's rights activists talk about this? Has any of them ever held these women accountable? Don't they believe in fairness, justice & gender equality?
Los Niños tienen pene
Las Niñas vagina
Solo hay 2 sexos
Solo las mujeres quedan embarazadas
La violencia de mujer hacia hombre si existe
El feminismo es una falacia
La ideología de género es una aberración
Hello Hindus
Have you seen this?? 🚨🚨🚨
If not, Must #Watch ⬇️
“if God gives me a chance to become PM , I will serve MUSLIMS the most” Narendra Modi before becoming PM..
We missed all these Modi Gems before 2014.. the man was very clear in his objectives & ideology..
The first thing he did on becoming PM was increase the UPSC coaching budgets for Muzzies to 1 lakh from Rs 50000 congress was paying 😂
Good luck Hindus
देवेंद्र फडणवीस जी, आपकी पत्नी किसी मुस्लिम TikToker को घर बुलाकर डांस या Reel बनाना चाहती हैं, उनकी अपनी इच्छा है हमें कोई आपत्ति नहीं।
पर ऐसी बेहूदी बात दोबारा न कहें कि Garba में मुस्लिम लड़कों को भी आना चाहिए। इतना शौक है तो अपने घर Garba करें, जितने चाहें बुलाएँ। समाज में अपनी निजी पसंद न थोपें।
all my deshbhakti has gone down the drain, my nation has been destroyed by the prime minister, even after observing the misuse of sc-st act and much more things, there are no reforms for it, instead doubling down of appeasement is being done.