Climate alarmists claim that it is a myth and/or conspiracy theory that scientists have to toe the mainstream narrative in order to get grant money from funding agencies like the NSF, get their research published in prestigious journals, and remain employed in academia.
But it’s not a myth; it’s a FACT.
The late Dr. William Gray was invited to a global warming meeting in Washington, D.C. by then-U.S. Vice President Al Gore in 1993. Gray told Gore that he’d attend, but he didn’t agree with Gore’s climate views, and soon after, Gray’s funding for climate research was cut.
Dr. Patrick Brown admitted that he and his coauthors left out “the full truth” in a paper on wildfires to get it published in Nature. That is, they knew the editors wanted a storyline that blamed climate warming for increased fire risk and not an examination of forest management and ignition sources.
I also personally know (and am friends with) two meteorologists who are university employees who cannot speak their minds on the issue because they’d be fired for openly expressing skepticism of the narrative of doom.
That’s why almost everyone who does speak freely on the skeptic side is older and/or retired.
I’m happy to explain it:
Autogynephilia is a fetish in which a man becomes sexually aroused at the idea of himself as a woman. The outbreak of “trans identities” amongst fully grown adult males over the past decade or so can, for the vast majority, be connected to the condition of autogynephilia, while they claim to have a “gender identity” of “woman”.
Gender identity has been put into law in many jurisdictions, and in many instances gender identity is overriding sex - which is the immutable characteristic connected to sex based rights. Sex based rights are what women & girls rely on for many spaces, services & sport.
With gender identity in law, it means that an autogynephilic man can use the law to have *more* rights than an actual woman: a man who is aroused at the idea of himself as a woman can use the law to go into a woman’s change room & her objection to that is irrelevant. A sexual fetish has more rights than a woman or girl.
Again, in the vast majority of instances, women’s mere objections to autogynephilic men - that they are actual women or that they should be legally permitted in female spaces - is framed as hatred or bullying. The simple word of “no” is used against women, in favor of the men who are aroused by the idea that they are women.
Many women’s lives, and livelihoods, have been or have attempted to be destroyed for simply saying “no” to men who are aroused by the idea they are women.
This level of gaslighting is bound to make even the most level headed woman, at the very least, angry. Women are allowed to be angry.
Dolly, I’m 77, 3 Years Behind You, And I Only Hope That People Remember Me In The Same Light As You And Your Greatness! And You’re A Much Bigger Star Than I Ever Dreamed Of Being! 🙏🏻
LSU is absolutely unburdened by whether you like their coaches or not. They’re really not going to escape that reputation so they might as well lean into it.
I cannot believe that in the year 2026 journalists are still being forced out for merely giving girls the chance to have their perspective heard.
Totally crazy Big Brother type stuff.
If you murder… ANYONE… You should go to prison for life.
It is irrelevant if you are insane.
It is irrelevant if you had a hard life.
It is irrelevant what skin color you have.
(Self-defense excluded)
This seems to be an unpopular opinion, especially amongst white women.
This map highlights something important.
Conservatives and libertarians generally view generosity as them donating their own hard-earned money to charity for a cause or to their churches out of free will.
Left-wingers view “generosity” as having the government forcibly take people’s hard-earned money through progressive taxation systems and redistributing it to those who didn’t earn it.
New York City’s buses may not be free — but transit officials say more riders are treating them like they are.
Nearly half of bus riders are now skipping the $3 fare, while paid ridership dropped nearly 8% in June and fare revenue fell $31 million during Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s first six months in office compared with the same period last year.
MTA Chairman Janno Lieber says “all of the talk of free buses” is having an impact, while the city’s largest transit union says fare evasion is the worst its drivers have seen.
Mamdani campaigned on “fast and free buses,” but the state-controlled MTA is already staring down a projected $300 million deficit next year — and one expert says the cost of eliminating bus fares could be roughly $1.1 billion annually.