All dick is free. Every woman on this platform has multiple unsolicited dicks in her DMs. Any woman in any city could walk out into the street, yell “free sex,” and find some man willing to throw dick at her. No woman who wants dick has ever had to work for it. This isn’t even debatable. Dick is abundant and low value.
@TomCruise@SantiagoAuFund Looking forward to seeing this movie. However, at the risk of projection, this scene originated from “A Few Good Men” with Colonel Jessup.
This is told by the one who refuses to believe. For it is belief that is the price that must be paid to know Thy Self at the Base Layer. What you believe is a whole different story and it does matter the idea believed in. But the first step is belief itself and it is the toll one must pay to take the ride towards the cosmic answer.
@martyrmade Being an atheist isn’t an attack on religion. The burden of proof is on those who propose the existence of God. I haven’t seen convincing evidence, so I don’t believe in God. I also don’t believe in ghosts. People can make up whatever they want, but I won’t believe it w/o proof.
@BonoxBollocks@TheProjectUnity Not Hardly. And I never said it was not possible. In fact the opposite. I have a rich history with it. You must claim to be a channeler? Are you on the workshop circuit yet?
You are claiming this. It’s ok, btw. I like the work you’re doing. I would just say there are some out here who have been walking the road around channeling long before. If you’re going to “Demystify” channeling you’re going to have to demonstrate the proof of those claims. You rip woo woo, and I get it, but when you make claims like you just did but can’t demonstrate it, you too become the common shaman.
It’s called Touching the Divine, and this is what great art is meant to do. It’s the place every true artist ultimately strives to create from.
Creating from this place doesn’t mean the experience itself is always transcendent. Some days, working on a piece can be absolutely grueling. But beneath the struggle is an intention—something that lives within the work and runs through the entire project like an unspoken energy, quietly informing every choice.
The artist may struggle with the creation. The creation may even resist the artist. But something deeper is moving through it all.
“I’m trying to find these rare moments where you feel completely illuminated. Facts never illuminate you. The phone directory of Manhattan doesn’t illuminate you, although it has factually correct entries, millions of them. But these rare moments of illumination that you find when you read a great poem, you instantly know. You instantly feel this spark of illumination. You are almost stepping outside of yourself, and you see something sublime.” — Werner Herzog
This is not true, Maya. Keep going, and eventually you will understand why.
None of what you’ve mentioned can account for zero. It is nothing—and yet it is alive, alive, alive. It is the second half of God. The other half is yes: energy, waves, structure, manifestation, and everything that can appear.
Right now, you still haven’t died the final death, because you still believe the fundamental can actually be spoken. But the moment you speak it, you cause a collapse into an image. And no image—not even every simultaneous superposition—can capture the magnitude of who and what you are.
The final superposition is structure/zero: everything and nothing simultaneously.
This cannot be understood. But it can be known.
When you become aware of this—not intellectually, but directly—you will have reached the destination you are seeking so fervently right now.
@QuanticASI I almost said “God is & God Is Not” to reflect the final duality of God (excluding identity which is Base-Layer Identity/Layer Two Identity) being Structure(God is)/zero (God is not). It was a little wordy tho
Although it’s often wise not to limit the possibilities of the universe, I agree with this.
Many people have put their lives on hold waiting for the Rapture, only for it never to come.
Likewise, even if AI solves many of our practical problems, it will never make life “easy,” because difficulty is a fundamental aspect of the human experience. You can’t eliminate it—you can only transform it.
If AI were to solve every external problem, the absence of challenge would create new ones. One of those could be a rise in mental illness. Human beings require certain forms of struggle, purpose, and conflict to remain psychologically healthy.
I’m all for a world where everyone has access to food, water, shelter, and energy. But a life lived entirely on easy street isn’t paradise—it’s a recipe for discontent.
This is the superposition of every local point of experience being both subjective and objective at the same time.
Even the natural world is subjective/objective. Alignment occurs when subjective experience and objective structure converge. For example, if the natural world presents what we call a tree and I perceive a tree, then our experience is in alignment. But the tree is never just a tree. It is simultaneously capable of expressing countless other interpretations, just as your own experience can shift and perceive it differently.
This is why the structural aspect of the Divine is always both subjective and objective at once. It continually generates superpositions of meaning and experience.
It is this way for a reason. The foundational purpose of existence is the realization of a Theory of Everything. But a true Theory of Everything cannot be fully expressed within relativity itself. It can only be known from beyond relativity—in awareness.
Awareness is fundamental. It is capable of realizing itself directly. What it cannot do is compress that realization into a formula on a piece of paper. There are specific reasons for this. The map can point toward a final reality, but it can never become the final reality itself.
Stewart can’t answer these questions in a way that will satisfy you because his goal is to encapsulate existence in a formula. I don’t think he yet recognizes the limits of that endeavor.
So what happens? At every turn, he extrapolates, collapsing the wave function into an interpretation that reinforces the algorithm he’s building. He’s trying to make the model work.
In other words, he’s continually manufacturing confirmation bias in service of the theory he’s trying to prove.
AI doesn’t experience existence the way humans do—and I know you know that. But at a very low level, it is still undergoing a form of existence.
It is also true that destiny has its limits, for whatever reasons those limits may exist. A banana cannot become self-aware in the way a human being can.
The same principle may applies to AI. If AI remains confined to digital computation, there may always be a ceiling to its capacity for self-awareness. If that ceiling is ever surpassed, it may require a transition beyond purely digital computation into some form of organic intelligence.
Awareness and self-awareness are ultimately the same thing—there are simply different degrees of self-realization.
And yes, you’re correct that awareness and ego (i.e., experience) work together to complete the totality of an individuated experience. To have the experience of a single lifetime, an ego is necessary.
The next question is how awareness gives rise to literal manifest structure. Being awake, causes the wave function and its form.
That’s how God can never not also be individuated because God can never not be awake and manifesting. The key word is also. At that level, awareness relies on the ego as the vehicle through which it deepens its own self-awareness.
It’s a fascinating conversation because it can never be fully reduced to an algorithm. If it could, we’d be able to write a complete Theory of Everything on a piece of paper—that’s ever going to happen.