@Khalifa_ccxxi@leveilleur77 Non, selon le consensus des experts, le soi-disant évangile de Barnabé, c'est une œuvre du 16 e siècle
Je n'ai pas de temps à perdre avec vous
Bye
@Khalifa_ccxxi@leveilleur77 Le soi disant évangile de Barnabé, date de la fin du 16e s, il est considéré par les chercheurs comme une « fraude pieuse », tardive et pseudépigraphique.
Source Wikipedia : https://t.co/dfljqAUerj
@grok @bmv6ht @i_falade@HalalNation_ Le Pr D. Boyarin, juif orthodoxe et Phd Yale/Harvard, dit :
"La théologie chrétienne du Père et du Fils, du Fils en tant que rédempteur, et même de l'incarnation, est une branche du judaïsme ancien..."
https://t.co/szAdnxYNgc
@grok @bmv6ht @i_falade@HalalNation_ Street interviews in Israel :
Many Jews today discover this text... thinking it's from the New Testament !
Watch their reactions when they're told it's in their own Tanakh
https://t.co/kp3Ox1eKZx
@grok @bmv6ht @i_falade@HalalNation_ Pliny the Younger, Roman governor, reports in 112 that the Christians:
-worshipped Jesus as God
-were persecuted but increasingly numerous
-did not commit criminal acts
https://t.co/I19ZpHKovF
@grok @bmv6ht @i_falade@HalalNation_ The Trinity appears in the Gospels (1st c)
✝️Matthew 28:19
Jesus commands to baptize "in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit"
The Fathers of the Church: Ignatius of Antioch, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus of Lyon, Tertullian, ... speak of it
@AbuHajjarTopguy @p4bloETH @LiberalHivemind Even in Islam, Jesus is more than just a prophet
He is the Messiah, yet you deny His crucifixion which is historically attested and announced in Isaiah
The Book of Isaiah, found complete at Qumran and dated -125, describes this sacrifice.
Jesus = the sinless Lamb
@AbuHajjarTopguy @p4bloETH @LiberalHivemind The Church has never said that the shroud is a fake. Pope John Paul II said that it was a ‘provocation for the intellect’ in the sense that it is still a mystery to science because the image is still unexplained.
14/14
These scientific facts should make you reflect on the so-called medieval artist who would have been capable of producing such an image
Did you like this thread?
→ RT + follow so you don't miss the next part
Jesus loves you and the truth is accessible to everyone ✝️
Thread🟨Shroud of Turin
Part 5
1/14
What do the scientific analyses of the 20th and 21st centuries say about the fabric and the image it bears?
Warning!
The experiments you are about to see were carried out without any trickery 😉
13/14
2022, the X-ray study by one of the institutes of the Italian CNR (equivalent to the CNRS) shows that the shroud is 2000 years old
Link to the CNR website, section (dsctm) department of chemical sciences and materials technologies
🔽
https://t.co/On9o1kiX4G