ETH has been so good and easy, can we please just continue there instead of SOL
$Asteroid needs to skyrocket to 1 bil asap so we can have a nice EVM run instead of getting molested at 7k mc
thank you
Cycles always repeat themselves
Speaking relatively but essentially:
1. High liquidity, few tokens -> mooners [market demands more tokens]
2. High liquidity, many tokens -> fewer mooners, decent amount of runners [neutral phase]
3. Low liquidity, many tokens -> few if any mooners, virtually no runners [YOU ARE HERE]
4. Low liquidity, few tokens -> few mooners, some runners start to appear [neutral phase]
Eh so just now everyone is realizing every subsequential pumpfun update makes trading more garbage?
No shit? At this point its just "when are they gonna make it even worse" rather than "does this make it better"
Return to tradition (EVM)
Cycles always repeat themselves
Speaking relatively but essentially:
1. High liquidity, few tokens -> mooners [market demands more tokens]
2. High liquidity, many tokens -> fewer mooners, decent amount of runners [neutral phase]
3. Low liquidity, many tokens -> few if any mooners, virtually no runners [YOU ARE HERE]
4. Low liquidity, few tokens -> few mooners, some runners start to appear [neutral phase]
@0GAntD@BeanzzSOL There are ways to fix the issue but it would require all bigger platforms (CEX and DEX) to be less greedy which is frankly not happening until liquidity is fully drained from them
Instead they'll throw you a cookie in some new shiny cashback form
these AI bots are so advanced already, they even know how to bundle themselves... like on $MOSS
i totally believe they skipped 20 steps and started bundling on their own
totally 0 intervention whatsoever
what's bizarre about the new @Pumpfun update is that the majority of people, who are opposing the fees being distributed to traders rather than incetivizing holding, are actually the ones making holding incredibly unattractive
a quick (and not so good) example:
if $Penguin already existed 1 month before the "main" one and was at 30k MC, the OG one with holders would simply never take off and everyone would be saying "just ape the main one". well what's the point of ever holding anything if you can just jump ship because some KOLs, insiders and whatever else decided to pump a different one?
and the new pumpfun update reflects that. there has been 0 upside of holding anything for months now. it simply is not worth for money to be sitting somewhere for most people because it could be used in better R/R and faster trades
so if you are in favor of pumpfun doing some sort of update that rewards holders, you should also be in favor of OG token, provided at least some metrics are checked out (i.e. still has community even if inactive, already had some ups and down on the chart and didn't just die out at 3k MC, etc.)
in my opinion, the main issue with pumpfun and other launchpads is that every new update deepens the problems we're encountering in the trenches. i believe there now needs to be so many changes reverted or improvements made that it would be easier if people instead slowly left these type of platforms until they pull themselves together
Something like this is why @Pumpfun and @solana in general need to go to 0 but hey @nikitabier is disabling competitors for his friend @a1lon9 with the new X updates. Pretty selective targeting as well
Not even trying to hide intents anymore or what?
Agreeing with this
I think now is the time to learn stuff on base if you're still only on sol
You will potentially be too late in a couple of days/weeks if there will be a second spike in volume
have to say I'm enjoying base a lot more than solana atm
shit is actually fun to research and invest in tech & people
last time I had this fun to dive deep in stuff was ICOs in 2017
honestly don't even want to make bear posts about @bonkfun anymore with the $groyper scheming
as they say, don't beat down a dead horse
also my advice still remains, try to focus on EVM right now even if it is slower
sol platforms need to fix bundling etc. first