Female nature is inherently obvious once you understand evolutionary biology
Female agency does not work like male agency. When men want something, they achieve it through displays of competence, violence, leadership and/or resource accumulation. Incidentally, these are all things women find attractive
When women want something none of the above work, as the weaker sex and the ones who bear children
What does work is leveraging the only power they have over men - their sexuality and ability to choose which men get to procreate and which don't. That power translates into having a chance to acquire the top tier men that trigger the above mentioned attraction cues
For women, the ability to flaunt their sexuality is their sole source of power. Take that away and society becomes inherently patriarchal. Note that female modesty was a mainstay in every religion and society prior to feminism
It should not be surprising why women fight so hard to get naked when you understand it's the be-all-end-all of their optimal sexual mating strategy to get access to an alpha Chad that they would otherwise have no chance with
NHS England has said that you cannot opt out of Palantir having your medical data and they refuse to review their policy.
So if you live in England, Palantir, Donald Trump, Netanyahu and co have access to all your medical data.
Nobody voted for this.
@ACosmin99@GrapheneOS@Hexsn1per Revolut is Dog Shit - They're notorious for debanking not just businesses but individuals who are politically incorrect
@zmacoxe@WorldWarPoo Yeah and all Mexicans are Illegal Immigrants and all Whites are Rednecks - Doesn’t take a Paki to point out the Retardismo behind just throwing Shit on the wall hoping it sticks.
A disabled Australian woman accidentally pocket-dialed a JEWISH nutritionist. Nobody spoke, just noise from her bag.
The nutritionist interpreted it as gunfire targeting her for being Jewish.
Her complaint landed the woman in court on a charge carrying up to five years in jail
Just in, an official response from NHS England regarding the public’s right to opt out of their Palantir-run “Federated Data Platform”:
NHS England has told us, in writing, that you cannot opt out of Palantir's platform.
On 28 August, NHS England's Data Protection Officer answered our demand for a formal review of the Federated Data Platform, the system Palantir built and runs under a 330 million pound contract. He refused the review. What he confirmed instead should alarm every patient in England.
"There is no opt out mechanism in place specifically for NHS FDP." That is a direct quote. The National Data Opt-Out, which millions of us registered precisely to keep our confidential records out of schemes like this, "does not apply" to anything NHS England does on the platform. Every single use falls under a legal exemption. The opt-out you registered protects you from nothing here.
Your last remaining right, the right to object under the UK GDPR, has been refused in advance. For most of the data, NHS England says the right simply does not apply. For the rest, it claims "compelling legitimate grounds" for every patient at once, before anyone has even objected. The law requires that right to be weighed one person at a time. A right refused for everyone, in advance, is not a right. It is a decision they made about your body's data without you.
The letter concedes that Palantir "has access to patient data", including identifiable records. The only safeguard offered against misuse is that it "would potentially be a criminal offence". And the DPO describes patient records with names removed as data in which nobody can be "directly or indirectly identified". That is the definition of anonymous data, and it is wrong in law. Pseudonymised records can be traced back to you, which is exactly why the law still protects them.
Nearly three years into the contract, no independent evaluation has reported. Asked to answer the published studies showing hospitals are not benefiting, NHS England offered its own case studies, "user stories" and "a video animation".