We refuse to boost journalists and news orgs by quote tweeting their posts if comments are closed. We’re calling on @elonmusk and @X to remove the ability for journalists and news orgs to turn off comments on this platform. Here’s why:
SPECIAL PLEADING:
Labour politicians used the Lawrence case to drive political change for decades while that family also grieved.
This is Special Pleading — a recognised logical fallacy — supported by Post Hoc Rationalisation of a principle that is applied only when institutional accountability threatens the preferred narrative.
@10DowningStreet And yet the country they fought for is unrecognisable. When this heroic gentleman expressed his concern about the state of the UK, he was trashed by leftists online.
🔒 COMMENTS CLOSED
“Henry Nowak deserves a legacy that goes beyond this awful tragedy” — UK PM after meeting family
0 comments · 142 retweets · 647 likes · 246K views
🔒 COMMENTS CLOSED
“Downing Street hits out at people seeking to stir division after Vance’s Nowak post”
0 comments · 15 retweets · 23 likes · 4.7K views
We refuse to boost journalists and news orgs by quote tweeting their posts if comments are closed. We’re calling on @elonmusk and @X to remove the ability for journalists and news orgs to turn off comments on this platform. Here’s why:
@steffd62@LBC RED HERRING
The Good case: a civilian ignored repeated direct orders from federal officers and moved her vehicle toward them. The shooting is under investigation.
The Nowak case: an innocent civilian did nothing wrong, told officers he had been stabbed, and died in handcuffs.
@PhilMyers53 RED HERRING
The Good case: a civilian ignored repeated direct orders from federal officers and moved her vehicle toward them. The shooting is under investigation.
The Nowak case: an innocent civilian did nothing wrong, told officers he had been stabbed, and died in handcuffs.
UNWARRANTED CAUSAL ATTRIBUTION:
Channel 4 has presented an unverified personal attribution as a framing device without noting that the base rate of rejection in publishing makes race an unnecessary explanatory variable.
Multiple rejection is a near-universal feature of publishing regardless of race. The industry is notoriously risk-averse.
RED HERRING
The Good case: a civilian ignored repeated direct orders from federal officers and moved her vehicle toward them. The shooting is under investigation.
The Nowak case: an innocent civilian did nothing wrong, told officers he had been stabbed, and died in handcuffs.
Vance defended an officer’s response to active non-compliance.
Vance criticised institutional failure of a compliant innocent victim.
@DamianLow3 Mechanisms used in this tweet:
TEMPORAL FALLACY or more precisely CONTEXTUAL MISREPRESENTATION — presenting evidence stripped of its originating context to make it appear more broadly applicable than the data supports.
Mechanisms used in this tweet:
TEMPORAL FALLACY or more precisely CONTEXTUAL MISREPRESENTATION — presenting evidence stripped of its originating context to make it appear more broadly applicable than the data supports.
NON SEQUITUR — The conclusion doesn’t follow from the premise. Disapproving of someone and wanting them banned from political comment are different claims entirely.
@implausibleblog PERFORMATIVE COMPASSION
Invite grieving family to Downing Street where they will be photographed by the press, instead of visiting privately.
PROJECTION
Accuse opponent of exploitation while exploiting the situation for political capital.
Mechanisms used in this post:
REPUTATION LAUNDERING
Positions Newman as a courageous journalist doing difficult work under threat, regardless of the quality of the interview itself.
AUDIENCE INOCULATION
Anyone now raising legitimate questions about Newman’s interviewing methodology has been pre-framed as part of the mob that sent death threats. The post does not make this explicit but doesn’t need to.
Legitimate criticism of Cathy Newman’s interview came from:
→ Zia Yusuf — on air
→ The US Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy — on X
→ Thousands of viewers who identified the loaded question framing
Sky’s post collapses all of that into “online abuse including misogyny and death threats.”
This framing appears designed to silence criticism.
@AndrewHWestern@RupertLowe10 PERFORMATIVE MORAL SUPERIORITY:
This week: MP Andrew Western called a political opponent “a sexist, misogynistic car crash.”
This week: MP Andrew Western called a female politician “thick as mince.”
Tu Quoque.
@AndrewHWestern@RupertLowe10 PERFORMATIVE MORAL SUPERIORITY:
This week: MP Andrew Western called a political opponent “a sexist, misogynistic car crash.”
This week: MP Andrew Western called a female politician “thick as mince.”
Tu Quoque.