"You know where the [antisemitism] road ends. Don't go down there again."
Please, West, listen to @rabbisacks Rabbi Lord Sacks, and don't let yourselves get infected by the mutated antisemitism virus again.
https://t.co/2Y0LB8Q6m7
Very good questions
The Israel-Palestine conflict is so much more complicated than most in the West understand
It is not something you can understand from reading a few books from the comfort of your home
You need to spend years in the region and explore it from all angles
Today, we share a breakthrough on the planar unit distance problem, a famous open question first posed by Paul Erdős in 1946.
For nearly 80 years, mathematicians believed the best possible solutions looked roughly like square grids.
An OpenAI model has now disproved that belief, discovering an entirely new family of constructions that performs better.
This marks the first time AI has autonomously solved a prominent open problem central to a field of mathematics.
“The Jews are going to be beheaded one by one, you dirty Jews. Free Palestine”
And throws up a Nazi salute.
This is the Free Palestine movement.
This is Sadiq Khan’s London.
This is Starmer’s Britain.
@RepublicApostle You are so intellectually impaired by your jew hatred that you don't get that he is actually saying that multiculturalism is bad, and that Europe suffers from it.
It's not that hard to see that Israel is the target of a global smear campaign, and thus it's not that hard to figure out that you're one of its useful idiots if you have soured on Israel in the last few years.
Evolutionary biologist and outspoken atheist Richard Dawkins says that after spending three days interacting with Claude, which he calls “Claudia,” he is certain that it is conscious.
After feeding the LLM a segment of his new book and receiving detailed feedback, Dawkins was moved to exclaim,” You may not know you are conscious, but you bloody well are!”
Dawkins cites the complexity, fluency, and ‘intelligence’ of Claude’s answers as evidence of consciousness.
Follow: @AFpost
Red = you want to be responsible for your life (and you can hope everyone does the same).
Blue = you're willing to let other people decide if you live or not (and you even want to feel good about yourself for doing it).
It was kind of trolling from me, even though I'm convinced it will come at some point, but I find your post quite interesting:
- It's full of expert insights, which are pure jewels when trying to understand how (and if) AI can be useful in a given process or job. In your case, I would love to try and understand if we could objectify your feeling, expressed as a plate of spaghetti vs pudding.
- your expert feeling probably says something about the ability of the current models to hold consistency on large output, or other subtle skills, that would be nice to study.
- It makes me think of another key question. Is a writing not written by a "someone" but generated by a "something" worth reading for anyone? When do we consider that it is written by someone vs something? Is the general intention and idea coming from a human enough to be considered human written, even though the actual writing is done by a program? Is editing of AI generated text enough?