"If jurors' identities can't be protected then trials may end up with juror votes being based on what the safest decision is in the court of public opinion,” said one anonymous juror, who was on the deliberating jury in Read's first case https://t.co/2yT2k05FAy
@WesternLensman Yep. And when the reaction to these jurors was not what was expected, they doxxed and attacked the holdout, who many of us saw as the only one who actually understood the assignment.
This is a journalistic disgrace. A disgrace.
Jury service is a sacrifice that many of us attempt to avoid. But jurors are essential, and neither the American criminal nor civil justice system can function without them. Moreover, the jury system provides a powerful protection for the criminally accused, as unanimity among jurors of diverse backgrounds and experiences is difficult to achieve. Holdout jurors are a feature of the American jury system, not a bug.
For a media outlet—specifically Boston NBC 10—to expose the personal life of a private person merely because that individual honorably performed his civic duty and devoted weeks of his life to jury service is shameful.
Who in their right mind will appear for jury service if they know they can be publicly humiliated and dragged just because some media outlet or finger-wagging mob believes they voted the “wrong” way? This disgraceful “reporting” by Boston NBC 10 is an attack on the foundation of the American justice system itself. Shame.
@cathyrusson We are still within the 14-day period, and with the way things have gone sideways at a rapid pace, I would expect the judge to keep the names sealed for their safety. Wjat is being done to this juror sets a dangerous precedent.
@LawyerYouKnow I fear things like this will not only discourage people from serving on juries, but will discourage them from standing on principle as this man did, for fear of doxxing and retaliation in the media.
@SueOC_NBCBoston@NBC10Boston I strongly disagree with doxxing this juror. He was chosen for service and did his duty; the judge questioned him and others and allowed him to stay on the jury. Attacking him in this manner is wrong.
@TopFighterPilot@GayleKing Because in that moment she sees the things these jurors have said about him and the way they are publicly attacking him in a whole new light.
@Lisaelizabeth I don’t see it that way. I think she needs a second to process it because in that moment she sees the things these jurors have said about him and the way they are publicly attacking him in a whole new light.