If anyone is wondering why conservatives are so obsessed with the culture war, here's why:
If culture goes too far in one direction, particularly in a direction where there is little to no moral framework, chaos ensues.
And laws don't matter if the culture doesn't enforce it.
@WirWar99@TheOmniLiberal A lot of speculation in that answer.
Im done with this conversation dude. Its honestly uninteresting at this point. There are multiple side-arguments going on that have to be unpacked and its tedious with limited characters, paired with the fact that I have a life offline.
@WirWar99@TheOmniLiberal We are arguing with different goals. Your goal is to prove that Trump engaged in an insurrection. My goal is to prove that leftists (presumably such as yourself) dont actually care about insurrections because the left has engaged in them numerous times. Its pearl clutching.
@WirWar99@TheOmniLiberal It certainly shows you are definitely okay with it. You pretended earlier as if she was "only talking about the protesters"
He actions say different.
@WirWar99@TheOmniLiberal ITS NOT LEGALLY RELEVANT BECAUSE HE WAS NEVER CHARGED WITH ENGAGING IN AN INSURRECTION. That is my answer. If it was SO OBVIOUS that he did, why was he never charged?
@WirWar99@TheOmniLiberal 3. I am operating under Destiny's criteria.
We are arguing under 2 different criteria.
(You mentioned Brandenburg).
I am not arguing from that.
@WirWar99@TheOmniLiberal Bro, are you slow? You asked me to ask AI if the contextual differences and factually and legally relevant.
I dont need to do that for a few reasons.
1. I dont agree with the criteria you are setting forth.
2. No 2 situations are ever 100% identical.
@WirWar99@TheOmniLiberal We are strictly operating under your own definition of what meets the criteria for an insurrection and I DONT AGREE with your criteria.
However, I am using the lefts standard (Destiny's criteria) and showing examples of how this broad application could be applied to the left.
@WirWar99@TheOmniLiberal Do you not find it extremely suspicious (at minimum) that 2 days after the May 30th insurrection, Kamala posted a bail fund? Wouldn't that show that she stands with rioters?
@WirWar99@TheOmniLiberal In fact, less than a week after her "they shouldn't stop" comment, the Wisconsin capitol was breached, windows were smashed and they tore down statues. Then Chaz/Chop happened which was undeniably and insurrection under the lefts definition.
@WirWar99@TheOmniLiberal Uh oh! Did you forget that my answer from earlier was that its NOT legally relevant for the purposes of this conversation?
If it was so blatant, why wasn't Trump charged with engaging in an insurrection?
@WirWar99@TheOmniLiberal Legally relevant in the context of this conversation? No. Thats my answer. No.
Is it contextually relevant? Sure. But we would need to get into specifics.
Answer under this specific post: Did I answer your question now?
@WirWar99@TheOmniLiberal Lets break this down:
Kamala made comments about how the rioters should not stop.
You say she's not referring to the rioters.
She then posts a bail fund for the rioters.
Did you forget that context?
@WirWar99@TheOmniLiberal My answer: of course context matters but YOU dont care about context. Only when it benefits you. It shows when you apply YOUR arbitrary standard:
"timing, direction, imminence..."
My point is, I can do the same thing with Kamalas comments