@fahad_kahut@NawazBugti112 Linguistically that is true
But genetic wise brahui and baloch are more genetically clustered together while Punjabi castes show genetic gaps between each other
So by DNA. Brahui/Baloch are more close than Punjabi castes are together
@Brahuieraj23@ArainGang This is a primary source written in the times of nuri nasir khan . This book was also also written on the orders of a ruler (abdali) who had connections with Nuri nasir khan
They know better than a Lori idiot like you
@Brahuieraj23@ArainGang Every single khan called themselves baloch
1 example is Tarikh-e Ahmad Shahi, first official history of the Durranis , written in 1756 by order of Ahmad Shah Abdali
It refers to Nasir khan Nuri as “Nasir Khan Baloch” and calls his territory "Mulk e Baloch" and "Balochistan"
@fahad_kahut@NawazBugti112 Ok so you also agree that Punjabi ethnicity should be removed and they should be labelled as Jatt,Rajput,Gujjar,Arain,Chuhra instead ?
@Brahuieraj23@ArainGang I’ve looked at your page and you seem to love posting British sources
The same British sources you love to post mention some brahui tribes also being jadgal in origin
Second time you have been caught lying now
@Brahuieraj23@ArainGang You are the same person that tried to deny that kalat rulers called themselves baloch 😂
Brahuis did defeat Jadgals but some jadgals did remain in jhalwan.
These same books you rely on mention tribes like Sasoli and Bizenjo being jadgal origin. Even channa zehris
@fahad_kahut Ain e akbari written centuries ago in 1596 refers to makran as Balochistan
Also around that time koh e suleiman was referred to Balochistan likewise kalat.
Punjab also had different historical names before so we should change Punjabs name too
@fahad_kahut@NawazBugti112 Even Punjabi as an ethnic group is not that old. Historically the people of that region had a different name.
Should we also change that? Should we remove the name Punjab?
@FobbyRaja@fahad_kahut Baloch extend from southern coast all the way to mountains of Kerman
Yes. Sheedis are East African slaves and assimilated in Iran/pakistans culture
You see Persians as superior to you which is very shameful and brings bad light to muhajir name
@FobbyRaja@fahad_kahut This is why you guys are seen as inferior becuase you see Persians/Turks/Arabs as superior
Baloch can be dark no doubt. But Chabahar is coastal region where sheedi(Africans) live. Many sheedis are also involved in the fish market
Bandari are also not white
@FobbyRaja@fahad_kahut Chabahar isn’t even dirty it might not be rich but it’s sure not dirty. Don’t confuse it with your muhajir hometown orangi town
Persians are brown themselves. They accept us as Iranic people
But we don’t seek there validation like Dalit convert Muhajirs.
@FobbyRaja@fahad_kahut This is why Pakistanis (Indian Muslims) are seen as inferior people becuase you have obsession with Persians/Arab/Turks
Every time Baloch is mentioned you bring up Persians/Iranians.
Average Persian doesn’t even say that. Baloch are known to be West Asian shifted/Iranic
@FobbyRaja@fahad_kahut Wrong. Brahuis are genetically baloch and have nothing to do with South Indians. Punjabis are closer to Indians genetically than Brahuis
@Brahuieraj23@ArainGang your very well known to make things up. Most baloch are not jadgal origin.
Funny enough jadgal origin is in jhalwan/makran. There are even some Brahui tribes in jhalwan which are labelled to have Jadgal origin like Sasoli and Bizenjo + some sub tribes of Zehri