@AntClose@CuriousRambling@rozali_126 I’d also like to point out here that you completely failed to address the part where I said “redacted parts completely unrelated to victims”.
@AntClose@CuriousRambling@rozali_126 I’m not hating on the process failures, I’m hating on the fact that these redactions are being pushed under the guise of “victim privacy” when they already outed a lot of the victims prior to that. So it’s obviously not simply for victim privacy
@AntClose@CuriousRambling@rozali_126 Sure, still doesn’t change the fact that what they redacted doesn’t have to do with victim privacy. They redacted things like the word “Don’t” because it has “Don” & “T” in it. Tell me exactly how redactions like that are protecting victims
@justtweets112@Schoolgrader1@joshallen2real@SarahisCensored Some did just like the officer on the side who got slightly sideswiped. That officer had already gotten hit by the time the car had pulled out and had turned to accelerate. At that point the car became a weapon and lethal force could be argued legally
@Schoolgrader1@joshallen2real@SarahisCensored I’m talking about the officers on the side/ who don’t make it there immediately. There was a single officer in front before she was moving, but the car wasn’t going forward as there was an entire car blocking it in that direction.
@joshallen2real@Schoolgrader1@SarahisCensored I will say though that in this case it wasn’t preventable on the officers side as she pulled the car towards them and accelerated rapidly when there was no space for them to quickly and safely move out of the way.
@joshallen2real@Schoolgrader1@SarahisCensored It’s the truth, I have law enforcement in my family and they have explicitly said that they are trained to not stand in front of vehicles so they won’t put themselves in danger, along with potentially escalating a situation.
@NotEvolution1@Brett_brasswell Observable: Transitionary fossils
Testable: Fruit Fly Study in 2022 that showed rapid genetic change in 60% of their genome due to changing environmental conditions
Repeatable: The same study above is repeatable
Falsifiable: everything is falsifiable. However this isn’t false
@DrengrMike@AlexWynnAshwood@RDN_Eonian@Buxrby@GodlyAction I’ll make it simple for you. Burden of proof + Hitchens razor. You make positive assertion (Satan is real)-> Burden of proof on you (you must support claim) -> if you can’t -> what can be stated without evidence can be dismissed without evidence
@DrengrMike@AlexWynnAshwood@RDN_Eonian@Buxrby@GodlyAction If you make a claim (that Satan exists and is real) it’s your burden of proof to prove. So either you 1) don’t have it or 2) you won’t provide it for some weird reason. Hold the L
@DrengrMike@AlexWynnAshwood@RDN_Eonian@Buxrby@GodlyAction Thanks for conceding to my point on Satan, I never said anything about Jesus. Nice yap session though. While I’m here why don’t you go ahead back to the other thread and provide the evidence of Satan
@JonathanAEvers Just a reminder that what caused inflation during that time was supply chain issues from COVID and the war between Russia and Ukraine. Niether of which were directly caused by Democrats. Remember though, Republicans promised the folllwing and haven’t kept their word
@DrengrMike@grok@RDN_Eonian@Buxrby@GodlyAction I can wait for you to prove Satan exists and how you specifically know and can demonstrate that he does. Let’s see what you can produce 🥱