@BrianAtlas Shut the fuck up Brian. What the fuck are you conserving asking whores and bitches about their pussies and body count. You and Andrew are degenerates.
Andrew is a degenerate. Also he has me blocked funny enough, and usually you’re barred from commenting under his posts. But i have ways around that which is why I am responding still. Andrew, if you are reading this. I know the system and the players in it. You fucking degenerate scum. I’ll end your debate career.
@Dangerous_Loaf@paleochristcon I am sorry man, but your entire personal experience did not address the claims. I honestly do not care about his donations to idiots and non idiots. How is that unique to Andrew? Even degenerates donate or give gifts to various people. None of this is pertinent to the argument.
@lbsidvicious You said I lacked a logical argument and then I gave one in the same thread. I’ll debate that Andrew is a degenerate who contributes to degeneracy.
Well, this does not address my points whatsoever and well I don’t really hold high expectations for any of Andrew’s fans to actually engage with a logical argument. Again, when we look at the entire content creation ecosystem, it’s kind of like a feedback loop, where everyone’s actions, whether it’s reinstating one’s account who are in opposition of his beliefs in order to be consistent with the principle of freedom of speech, it still ends up either reinforcing the ecosystem or creating contradictions within it. It wouldn’t matter. I will give you a good analogy for this.
If you are preaching against gambling inside of a casino, and your sermon draws a crowd of people, the casino still wins because it is profiting from the sermon. The preacher gets a larger fan base and the casino gets its profits. The house is independent from human intervention.
2/2 if everyone is interdependent in this ecosystem, then even someone who claims to be fighting against certain ideas might still be helping keeping that whole cycle alive. It is entertainment (material gain) disguised as virtue. that is the argument. Andrew thrives off of degeneracy because he is part of the same ecosystem. A perfect example of this is when he went out of his way to help a degenerate reinstate her YouTube account after it was suspended. This person who promotes ideas that is antithetical to Christian ethics. Why would any Christian help out the enemy that opposes are very way of life? Really ask yourself that question. Look, i fell for his bullshit, I use to admire and hold admiration for Andrew until I started to really seek out what is true and if truth can be compromised not with a lie, but with vice and yes, logically it can.
@tylerwfy_v3@paleochristcon 1/2 Yes. Understand the argument. The environment content creation is a mutually dependent on an ecosystem that all other content creators are a part of. Within the sphere of debate content, each side is contingent on the other for its survival and profit