There's so few rappers I listen to these days because their music became harder and harder to relate to.
I keep going back to Larry June. Makes such versatile music around staying healthy, investing your money right, cultivating a good mind set. The new who coppin project is 🔥
I thoroughly enjoyed Brandon Ingram's time in Toronto, he brought a level of professionalism to the team and was instrumental in them taking the next step. He's got a fan for life, thank you Brandon, best of luck in LA 🙌
BREAKING: The Los Angeles Clippers are nearing deal sending Kawhi Leonard to the Toronto Raptors for Brandon Ingram, Gradey Dick, 2 first-round picks, 1 pick swap and 2 second-rounders, sources tell ESPN. A return to Canada for the Raptors champion and two-time Finals MVP.
@mpredz@lejeunesimon@Wealthsimple Well to be fair on the point of retail being exit liquidity, that's essentially what an IPO is in the public market. Also private investments don't carry the same liquidity as public stocks so imo this on the surface seems no different than a traditional PE investment.
Nothing your saying is unreasonable, it's just the fact that he can't admit he will have to dilute current investors in order to make the math work; then tried to gaslight Andrew, Becky and crew like they were stupid for asking a pretty basic question.
I get why people want to hate on this douchebag. But imho it's totally reasonable for a small company to buy a much much larger company with debt and equity issuance. Anyone with even a few years of skin in the game have seen leveraged buyouts and leveraged merger transactions. Frankly I even get the overlap between GameStop and EBay in terms of collectibles and other consumers stuff. People do leveraged buyouts/mergers for much less valid reasons. If you don't think the debt funding is secured sell $EBAY. If you don't think the deal is good for $GME shares because they are paying too much sell the share. But a 50/50 debt equity deal isn't outrageous.
I'll never forget what im seeing from Scottie Barnes in this series. This is superstar level production and a clear step up into being a #1 option on a competitive team, while remaining an all-defensive level defender.
Incredible stuff.
@NekiasNBA Still needs to round out his game inside the arc, can make short mid rangers after bullying guys to his spot. Needs to make more spot up 3s as well, which would open up his drive game.
Overall his offensive game has made progress, only 24 and has time to get better. Rn, not a #1
This might be a stupid question but why is Serena Williams, arguably the greatest female athlete of all time, with access some of the best sports science, medicine and nutrition on earth, using a GLP-1?
Your credit card rewards exist because someone else is paying 25% APR. Cap that at 10% and the points don’t survive.
I spent years working inside fintech and card programs. That interest margin is the invisible buffer that makes rewards, lounges, and credits pencil out.
Capping credit card APRs at 10% sounds like an obvious consumer win. Cards charge 20 to 30%, many consumers revolve balances, and the system feels punitive.
But credit card economics are not just about interest rates. They are a cross-subsidized system where revolvers subsidize transactors, rewards rely on behavioral inefficiency, and risk-based pricing subsidizes access.
Remove one leg of that stool and the system does not become fairer; it rebalances. And the costs show up where consumers notice most.
Lets look at how this would impact 3 programs
1. AMEX Platinum
A 10% credit card APR cap would not make your card cheaper or better. You would still have access, but you would almost certainly get less value for the same or higher price.
The Platinum brand survives because its customers are affluent, pay in full, and tolerate high annual fees. What quietly supports that ecosystem is portfolio-level profitability, which allows AMEX to tolerate loss, overuse, and inefficiency in premium benefits.
When that margin shrinks, the cost shows up directly in your (lesser) benefits.
In a world where:
- Rewards economics tighten
- Devaluations become more likely
- Flexibility is reduced
Points become a liability to the issuer, and liabilities get repriced.
So what this likely means for you as a Platinum cardholder:
- Lounges do not expand to fix crowding. Instead, access tightens or amenities are reduced.
- Statement credits become harder to use, more fragmented, or less generous.
- Annual fees go up
- New approvals become more selective, even for high earners.
Your card still works, but the value proposition shifts. Platinum becomes more explicitly pay-to-play, with fewer hidden subsidies propping up premium perks.
You pay the same or more, and you get a little less in return.
Which is why some people are already warning that points devaluations become more likely in this environment (like @BowTiedBull this morning saying "Dump ALL your credit card points. All of them.")
2. Bilt Card
This program is the canary in the coal mine for what to expect.
Bilt’s super popular rent rewards worked because Wells Fargo was willing to subsidize them. The card offered 1 point per dollar on rent with no fees because Wells Fargo paid Bilt roughly 0.8 percent (80 bps) of each rent payment to fund rewards... despite earning little or no interchange on those transactions.
But that is some actuarial level math with a number of variables at risk that proved wrong/ unsustainable.
Wells Fargo was getting hosed $10 million a month on the program, so they exited the partnership years before the original end date and forced Bilt to restructure its rewards with a different bank
What does that teach us?
- When interest and interchange margins shrink, banks stop tolerating loss-leading reward programs.
- Interest income does not fund every reward directly, but it provides the buffer that allows experiments like Bilt to exist at all.
- Remove that buffer and rewards must be paid for explicitly.
Bilt’s shift to a three-tier lineup with annual fees is not an anomaly. It is the direction rewards go when credit stops quietly absorbing losses.
Pay-to-play rewards.
What feels like consumer protection will shows up as fewer perks, pay-to-play rewards, and less room for innovation.
3. Credit One & other Subprime Cards
Now the least glamorous corner.
Subprime cards get criticized for high APRs, annual fees, low limits, minimal rewards. But they exist for a reason.
They serve thin-file borrowers, damaged credit, people shut out of conventional loans, households using cards for liquidity not perks... but they charge high APRs because charge-offs exceed 8-10%, fraud and servicing costs are higher, and credit limits are small while fixed costs remain significant.
A 10% cap makes these products mathematically impossible.
These cards don't become cheaper. They cease to exist.
As @sytaylor noted this morning - "You realize this will push many more customers towards loan sharks?"
The demand for credit doesn't disappear... it migrates to BNPL with opaque effective APRs, chronic overdraft usage, fee-heavy installment loans, and less regulated lenders like loan sharks/ payday loans.
So who WOULD win? Debit-First Fintechs
One of the least discussed consequences: where would reward customers migrate?
I think 1% cashback programs are an obvious winner. Chime, Varo, Current and niche cards like Greenlight and Privacy.
(If you have not worked in a fintech or a bank you probably don't know what the Durbin Amedment is - but the TL;DR is that very large banks (BoA, Wells, JPMC) have capped interchange rates of around 27 bps on debit swipes.
Small banks with < $10B AUM, however, do not - they can earn 1-2% on interchange (avg was 160 bps or so last I checked).
Which is why all of the debit card fintech companies you've heard of are partnered with these smaller banks - they can offer rewards like 1% cashback programs and still have margin sufficient to build a business around.)
In a world where credit rewards shrink, access tightens, and annual fees rise, debit-based fintechs look better by comparison.
But consumers lose: credit protections, payment float, stronger dispute rights, credit-building opportunities.
TL;DR
An APR cap feels like consumer protection.
In practice it reshapes the market in ways that are easy to miss:
- It will shrink access to credit
- Eliminate rewards programs that aren't tied to high annual fees
- Force risk into less regulated channels
- Unintentionally advantages debit over credit
- Help affluent transactors more than vulnerable borrowers
Credit doesn't become cheaper. It becomes scarcer, less flexible, less transparent.
But banks will adapt.
Fintechs will adapt.
Consumers caught in the middle do not get protected.
They get fewer choices, worse products, and priced out.
Jack Armstrong's colour commentary even after all these years is under rated. Analysis is just spot on in almost every scenario. He's a Homer for sure, but he knows the game very well and does it an excellent job communicating it to fans of all types.
Scottie Barnes has developed an excellent feel for the touch pass or quick extra pass around the basket that has lead to so many easy buckets this season.
Good indication hes reading the play before the ball reaches his hands. Clear growth in his game this season
Tesla has to add $6.5 TRILLION in market cap for him to get this money. Thats about a 6x from here.
He basically has to add about 2 Googles worth of market cap for him to get this money.
Given TSLAs pivot to AV, Hes far from "in line", hes so far rn it's not even funny.
Musk, who spent $270 million to get Trump elected, is now in line to become a trillionaire.
Meanwhile, 60% of our people are living paycheck to paycheck.
Americans understand we're living in a rigged economy.
Together, we can and must change that.
First thing tomorrow morning, Al Golden should be fired.
Bring in a new DC during the bye week and put something respectable on the field in 2 weeks. You can't field that defense in this iteration again.
The BANK OF CANADA just said it out loud:
“Canadians must accept a lower standard of living.”
After a DECADE of Liberal madness
Third World Canada is HERE 🇨🇦💀
Hope that KID FREE LUNCH PROGRAM was worth it.