Blank

If you need to block me because you can't support your positions, reconsider your positions.

Twitter says my name can't be blank. Apparently it can.

[Blank @ThomBlank]

@HorrorGorl The way to get there with both parties is to demonstrate that our poor health outcomes are a national security issue. Which, frankly, they are.

[Blank @ThomBlank]

@NothingIsArt And yet, I’m doing that very thing.

[Blank @ThomBlank]

@David_Charts2 @RBReich They don't "have" $108 trillion.

They have assets.

And to pay your proposed tax, the IRS would have to seize-and-sell their assets.

[Blank @ThomBlank]

@RBReich The idea that there's been an "upward redistribution of wealth" falsely presumes a limited supply of wealth.

There is not!

But public-funds-leeching-millionaires like @RBReich need you to think that rich people are taking money from you.

They are not!

[Blank @ThomBlank]

@mcsquared34 Poverty is the default position in life. What's remarkable isn't that so many people are poor, but that people actually have wealth.

[Blank @ThomBlank]

@RossCol89474735 Yeah, no one committed suicide in the wonderful USSR, right?

[Blank @ThomBlank]

@ThiaBallerina Funny that democrats no longer bring up ending the filibuster.

[Blank @ThomBlank]

@AnnieForTruth Clinton paid off the woman he raped and his base still embraced him, so....

[Blank @ThomBlank]

@MAGA_Puppy I would. You shouldn't.

[Blank @ThomBlank]

@ennui365 College barely helps those who actually paid for it.

College shouldn't be made free. It should be made mostly unnecessary.

[Blank @ThomBlank]

@tessa18640 @brontyman The middle class shrunk because:
1. More households move UP from the middle class than moved down.
2. Those that moved down are predominantly single-mother households, which have nearly double over the last 50 years.

[Blank @ThomBlank]

@brontyman Since the term "trickle down" was first uttered, the middle class in the US has shrunk because more people UP from the middle class than moved down.

Oh, and those that moved down are predominantly single-mother households, which have increased dramatically since the 80's.

[Blank @ThomBlank]

@Soulful1865 Says "every time", but constantly points to Tulsa as the example....because that IS the only example.

[Blank @ThomBlank]

@RepEricBurlison There was a time that the US government knew nearly nothing about the individual citizen, but the individual citizen knew nearly everything about the government.

Let's get back to that.

[Blank @ThomBlank]

@queenie4rmnola At what rate did white people die during the same period?

[Blank @ThomBlank]

@mcsquared34 You complain a lot about landlords, but where do you think people who can't afford to buy a house would live if there weren't people providing places they can rent?

[Blank @ThomBlank]

@sirDukeDevin They don't have more money. They have more wealth. There's a huge difference.

[Blank @ThomBlank]

@ennui365 When "harm other people" means "hurting their feelings", then the "harmed" people are not equipped for a free society in which people have the right to express their opinions.

[Blank @ThomBlank]

@zellieimani Nearly no one says this. Your nearly certain to not live in poverty if only you:
- Graduate high school.
- Get and keep a job at the top of your skill level.
- Don't have kids outside marriage.

[Blank @ThomBlank]

@pcoastfool @zellieimani @Himjamin777 For sure.

I'm not saying one can't get out of poverty having not accomplished all three (although the likelihood goes down considerably with each one). Rather, I'm saying that, if you do all three, you'll not likely live in poverty.