成奕

[成奕 @ThoughtLinkCo]

方案在 Claude，审查在 Codex，还得自己把两边对上。

GFT-Merge 把选中的会话拖到一起，带进新会话。
这次新会话保住了“HTTP 接口不改、不加队列”，也知道“并发重复写入还没修”。

虚构输入，真实操作；不带工具输出。
https://t.co/S5B2v7w2f4

[成奕 @ThoughtLinkCo]

AI 提了个建议，换一轮却当成了你交代的任务。

交接时，我想保住四件事：
已定：先定位接口变慢
限制：这轮不加缓存
备选：缓存尚未确认
下一步：查耗时，改范围先问人

示意卡和完整例子：
https://t.co/S5B2v7w2f4

[成奕 @ThoughtLinkCo]

所谓 “问道之心”和“证道”

[成奕 @ThoughtLinkCo]

“长期缺能源，永远缺存储”

[孙宇晨（去过太空版）🧑‍🚀 @sunyuchentron]

短期缺芯片，长期缺能源，永远缺存储，BitTorrent前途不敢想象啊

[成奕 @ThoughtLinkCo]

简中 X 真的是趋势么？那我可真得冲了；

[成奕 @ThoughtLinkCo]

@aakashgupta Your “human picks one” step is what I’m exploring in GFT Map. Example: freelancers first, bank sync postponed. Open “Continue in another chat”—does it add anything over a state file? Authored preview; no install or model run.
https://t.co/3MY62DJk52

[成奕 @ThoughtLinkCo]

@ank 考え方を残して参照する運用に近いGFT Mapを作っています。採用案と保留を見返す例です。Continueを押すと、次の相談に渡す内容を見られます。今のファイル運用に足す価値があるか、よければ見ていただけませんか。人が書いた英語例・インストール不要・AIは動きません。
https://t.co/3MY62DJk52

[成奕 @ThoughtLinkCo]

@CathyYoung63 For your novel-editing handoff, I’m testing a GFT Map brief of choices to keep and questions left open. Try changing one choice, then “Continue in another chat”. Would it help? No install; authored writing example, no model run.
https://t.co/tZseIfgI5H

[成奕 @ThoughtLinkCo]

@FrancisDhun For your session-records point: this GFT Map example keeps the storage choice, reason and pending retry check together. Open “Continue in another chat”—would a new operator know what to pick up? No install; authored preview, no model run.
https://t.co/xy2QHUCMgT

[成奕 @ThoughtLinkCo]

@yyn1748762 好，先核上面那一个问题就行。卡住就告诉我停在哪一步，我帮你看；顺利的话告诉我能否直接找到答案。

[成奕 @ThoughtLinkCo]

Manual entry first. Bank sync later—and the reason stays with the decision.

I made this editable GFT Map example for AI chats. Open “Continue in another chat” to see the handoff preview.

No install. Authored example; no model is running.

https://t.co/3MY62DJk52

[成奕 @ThoughtLinkCo]

@neel_sh_ A concrete preview for your “half-finished decisions” point: manual entry first, bank sync postponed. Change that choice and open “Continue in another chat” to see what carries over. No install; authored example, no model run.
https://t.co/3MY62DJk52

[成奕 @ThoughtLinkCo]

@rishanthrajendh Your emphasis/omission point is what I’m exploring in GFT Map: keep the writer’s choices visible. Tiny editable example—change a choice, then preview what the next chat would read. No install; no model run:
https://t.co/tZseIfgI5H

[成奕 @ThoughtLinkCo]

@yyn1748762 补一个实测：v0.3.8 跑完了8.6万字符的公开文件，正文有尾段，但主线还留着过时描述。文件导入不同于你原报错的路径，不能算原问题已验证。
可将这份原文存为txt交给GFT导入，只核“默认关GIL是已定还是设想？”不用私人材料：
https://t.co/G0tqtnP3Dk

[成奕 @ThoughtLinkCo]

@itsAhOh Since the fix, have your own checks caught anything that misrepresented what you meant? If so, did editing the entry fix the next task, or did you have to remind the agent again?

[成奕 @ThoughtLinkCo]

@ChenMoneyQ Does that explicit instruction hold in later rewrites, or do you have to repeat it? If you can share a tiny non-sensitive before/after, I’ll compare a GFT Map correction record with your current approach.

[成奕 @ThoughtLinkCo]

@Madeactual @AkitaOnRails Your maintenance warning surfaced in a local test: I changed a decision in the Doc, but one node's detail stayed stale until I corrected it too. Fictional case, real run. That inconsistency needs fixing before I can claim a reliable review surface.

[成奕 @ThoughtLinkCo]

@Madeactual @AkitaOnRails GFT Map currently turns conversations into editable decisions, reasons and open questions, so people and a later agent session can inspect the current understanding. It isn't tied to the PR or handoff record yet. That's the workflow I still need to test.

[成奕 @ThoughtLinkCo]

@9yearfish @bearliu 你把客户沟通交给 AI 整理后，哪些内容还会自己核对，比如客户确实同意了什么，还是只是我方建议？最近有没有需要自己改回来的例子？我在研究这种整理在真实工作里还剩下哪些判断。