I interview people about their sexual fantasies, desires, and the psychology behind them.
Over 4,000 voices. Over 12 years.
This account shares what I've found.
@surrealwhore You can do things you like and not get paid, or you can do things you dislike and get paid.
Truth is women are submissive and not made to dominate. What you want isn't arousing to him either.
@WilderJedidiah@cosmonations1@urethrafister69 @backlessdress26 You mean you have declared then arbitrary, arbitrarily.
They are not arbitrary. There, I have cleared that up for you.
@WilderJedidiah@cosmonations1@urethrafister69 @backlessdress26 What you just said is nothing like we are talking about. One is a natural evolution, the other the result of a lack of education.
@Iska_dr1@benlandautaylor As well as agreeing with a guy that said treat them like shit.
That's the issue I have. Your portrayal is warped.
The capability for violence is just one part of many sexual cues for women, and treating them like shit certainly is not!
@Iska_dr1@benlandautaylor Unless you're a world leading sexologist it's not going to be important, because we have access to their opinions and work.
"Two things in common: Integrated aggression (they can all be physically imposing and dangerous) and overall lack of concern in women"
Is what you said
@Iska_dr1@benlandautaylor What you mean is you have decided that you know more than both women and the psychologists.
A much more honest view of female fantasies is that they are obsessive doting lovers with a thin veneer of violence more reminiscent of a Disney villain than actual violent men.
@Iska_dr1@benlandautaylor It is the core. You have clearly read what you wanted to read from the psychological literature and not what is stated.
Because of this you are misrepresenting some sexual cues as being the core components and totally sidelining far more important ones.
@Iska_dr1@benlandautaylor "Is a trait"
No. It is the core of the attraction. Far more important than the capability for violence.
You attempted to portray the fundamental sexual cues as purely violence and a disinterest in women. That is a pure fabrication.
@Iska_dr1@benlandautaylor This is well studied by psychologists. What you said is false. Just a horrible misunderstanding of a very clear and obvious trope.
A key component to female attraction is kindness. It is the capability for violence AND kindness that makes a male valuable as a mate.
@Iska_dr1@benlandautaylor This is categorically false. You have not explored the literature at all, just going off of rumours.
The actual truth represents the complex needs a woman requires in a partner to be successful.
@WilderJedidiah@cosmonations1@urethrafister69 @backlessdress26 We invent new words for new concepts.
This is purely from ignorance, and low intelligence. Trying to sound cool from using idiotic slang.
@cosmonations1@urethrafister69 @backlessdress26 Yes it's more vulgar and violent. But most importantly it's retarded.
Words already exist for this, you only start using random new ones if you're uneducated.