Thunder ⚡⚡

[Thunder ⚡⚡ @Thundercastic]

Funny that people were more outraged because "women were beaten" and not that "students were beaten."

[Feminazi Sl@yer 🗡️ @Smash_Gynocracy]

Boys were beaten up like dogs. But, a single slap created more outrage because the receiver was a girl.

India is a gynocentric, matriarchal society.

[Thunder ⚡⚡ @Thundercastic]

Opportunists always find a way out

[𝒱𝒶𝓇𝓊𝓃 @Varunx269]

2 days ago feminists were playing gender card in NEET protest and saying how can you beat females.

Now they're doing this photoshoot for reels and attention, you'll see thousands of posts now labelling them as strong independent women.

So where were these strong women gone but police was beating male students? Why didn't they came to protect them? Instead they ran away and hide behind men, and now when everything is fine, they're intentionally clicking these photos to look empowered.

Btw the girl who posted it, she's an Instagram influencer who posts semi nude content in bikini and posts premium subscription content like Muskan Karia & Fit Girl.

I don't support this kind of empowerment, it's just a way of seeking attention and taking credit of all those male students who stood and fought hard and risked their lives. But now no one is appreciating them, everyone is just posting a random photo of a Instagram model who was hiding behind male students during protest.

Feminism and simpism has blinded this society.

[Thunder ⚡⚡ @Thundercastic]

Once married, it's a shared responsibility of anything that a person can do, whether household work or financially or you do this, I'll do that. Anything else is just convenience to exploit someone

[Ankit Pandey @iamankitpande]

My friend got married 3 years ago.

He earns ₹60,000 a month.

He pays the home loan, groceries, medicines, bills, and every household expense.

His wife earns ₹45,000.

According to him, her entire salary goes to her parents and brother. She has never contributed financially to the home they live in.

He has no emergency fund, no savings, and says he feels like an ATM, not a husband.

Serious question.

Why is it considered a husband's duty to provide for everyone, but a wife's income is often treated as her personal choice?

If a husband sent 100% of his salary to his own parents and expected his wife to run the house alone, would society defend him too?

Equal rights should come with equal responsibilities. Agree or disagree?

[Thunder ⚡⚡ @Thundercastic]

The Wife and all family gets provided, bills get paid, and husband takes care of them, but as a housewife (who doesn't have a job) takes care of house as a responsibility is suddenly Unpaid labour? So by definition, the man is doing "Extra labour."

[☕️ @alooookeparathe]

The idea of happy family for these people is a wife who works as a free 24/7 maid, cooks and cleans without complaining and serves as a baby making machine lmfao

[Thunder ⚡⚡ @Thundercastic]

If a woman doesn't help you in paying bills, don't marry her. It's as simple as that

[Sayantika @SayantikaSays]

If a Man can't help you in the kitchen then don't marry him.
It's as simple as that.

[Thunder ⚡⚡ @Thundercastic]

They only want propoganda to feed their hatred mentality

[SIFF - Save Indian Family Foundation @realsiff]

There is no NCRB data that says, 35000 wives were killed by husbands in last 5 years. So, this fake data. Anyone can fact check this.

As per feminism, women can openly tell lies about facts, data and statistics during their campaigns against men and patriarchy.

If men remain silent to such lies, then politicians will make more anti-male laws.

[Thunder ⚡⚡ @Thundercastic]

Any victim is a victim regardless of who they are. Strange how caring for a victim is misogyny for feminists if he's a man, very intellectual.

[ruchi kokcha @ruchikokcha]

Easy to turn a blind eye towards the data because you are blinded by misogyny

[Thunder ⚡⚡ @Thundercastic]

Feminists are so biased that even though there are women committing crimes everyday, they'll keep saying "1 case - 4-5 cases."

A victim deserves sympathy no matter how many cases.

Funny that these people claim feminism is about gender equality but only see women as victims.

[Catty @CatWomaniya]

Women have been screaming on top of their lungs about how arranged marriages have been the root cause of many crimes against women.

DV, dowry deaths, marital rape. Millions of women lost because of this institution. Nobody gave a fuck.

One man becomes a victim and suddenly they realise it’s the core problem?

Misogyny is everywhere if you pay attention.

[Thunder ⚡⚡ @Thundercastic]

Many women only date or marry for money. It's 100x better to be more cautious than choosing to be an ATM for someone

[Sheetal @sheetalbytheway]

Guys are actually very scared of marriage these days.

My friend is filthy rich and he's stopped believing in the arranged marriage concept even though his parents keep pushing him.

He said, "I've unknowingly started judging girls by how they react to money. I keep dates very basic, never show how much I have and just try to have real conversations to understand who they really are.

Sometimes I feel bad that I've become like this, but looking around has made me this way."

[Thunder ⚡⚡ @Thundercastic]

Not him calling alpha a great movie 😭

[sumati @iamsum80]

How do you know #Alpha sucks?

This :

[Thunder ⚡⚡ @Thundercastic]

YRF thought alpha would save spy universe 😭🙏🏻

[Thunder ⚡⚡ @Thundercastic]

Peak stupidity to justify a killer, he might have lost his brain cells by reading his own writings

[Chetan Bhagat @chetan_bhagat]

Hi all,

'Why Siya Couldn’t Say No To Marriage', my column in TOI today.

Do read and share!
https://t.co/WTPGqeuTtn

[Thunder ⚡⚡ @Thundercastic]

What do you expect from rebel kid, Sanity?

[Warlock Hindu @WarlockHindu]

Apurva Makheja's Bold Confession on Casting Couch:

Apurva Makheja openly declared, "I am not going to sleep with anyone for a 2-rupee role.

If some sheikh throws 10–15 crores at me, I am ready." While discussing the casting couch, she essentially suggested women should smartly monetise their sexuality and put a price tag on it.

This mindset from someone with 4.4 million followers has raised eyebrows. When a man casually dropped the "₹370" remark, there was massive outrage and moral policing.

But when a woman herself openly sets a price of ₹10–15 crores for the same act, the silence or selective reaction is telling.

The real issue for some isn't the act itself — it's simply negotiating the right price. Hypocrisy much?

[Thunder ⚡⚡ @Thundercastic]

They get away with this disgusting shit by saying "Dark Humour"

[ShoneeKapoor @ShoneeKapoor]

Some women today openly joke about mutilating baby boys and the crowd laughs.

She said her mother wanted to cut off her brother's private parts when he was born. She cried because it couldn't happen. Now she says that when she has a son, she'll fulfil that "dream."

Imagine a man saying he can't wait to hurt his future daughter because his father once wanted to. He would be destroyed publicly, lose his career, and rightly so.

But when hatred towards men is packaged as feminism, even violence against male babies becomes "dark humour" and "empowerment."

So what exactly are we celebrating here? Equality? Or a culture where cruelty against boys is entertainment?

Apparently, talking about harming male children is comedy. But make a joke about consensual adult relationships and suddenly the outrage brigade wants your head.

The issue isn't comedy. The issue is selective morality. If your principles change based on the victim's gender, they were never principles to begin with.

[Thunder ⚡⚡ @Thundercastic]

Both made wrong statements and should be equally guilty

[Dev @refocus21]

Meet Himanshu Jangra and Sejal Pawar :

Himanshu Jangra :

> Went on Pranit More's show
> Made the "370 biryani vasool" remark
> After that
> Got trolled everywhere
> Got abused online
> Apologised publicly
> Got fired from his job

Sejal Pawar :

> She is a doctor
> Went on the same show
> Made jokes about dead bodies
> Said she and her friends
> Make fun of male dead bodies
> Make fun of D size of dead bodies
> After that
> Gained more than 2 lakh followers
> Wasn't fired from her job
> Didn't face outrage on the same level as Himanshu
> Many self-proclaimed feminists are defending her

The question is If Himanshu deserved criticism for what he said, that's a separate discussion. But why is Sejal Pawar not receiving the same level of backlash? Why is she gaining followers and support instead of facing similar consequences?

Shouldn't standards be applied equally, regardless of whether the person is a man or a woman?

[Thunder ⚡⚡ @Thundercastic]

Chup

[Thunder ⚡⚡ @Thundercastic]

Sach keh raha hu

[Thunder ⚡⚡ @Thundercastic]

Kon hai 😾

[Thunder ⚡⚡ @Thundercastic]

Hmmmm......

[Thunder ⚡⚡ @Thundercastic]

💀