@larayapmaaq Mercator projection that you have there saved probably millions of lives on oceans. It distors SIZE, translating a 3d sphere on a 2d paper, but it keeps the correct angles and azimuth. It was invented primarily for navigation, not for the assessment of real sizes of countries
@MrBellinghamUS@holland_tom Bruh, money can make SOME women take it in the ass form a client in a truck, also money can make ANY and all "critics" type some words, eazy peazy. What are we talking about here π€£
@Jyrair@sousazone In this case OP is in a retardation league of his own by not saying this upfront. How am I supposed to make sense of what I saw versus what was written. Thank you for your clarification
@megbasham I m sorry, i d fuck my white wife daily, but sadly i need to wait a few days usually. In all 100% honestly, i wouldn't bang this chick, period. Not to say that i haven't seen porn with black chicks that i went "daaaaamn". But NOT this one. Maybe i m in a minority, but don't think
@Variety Genuine question. Box office doesn't lie, the modern audience are some trans on Twitter, and it's simple. But how does a site like Variety, pays their lgbtq+oledtv employees? Is there an enough modern audience visiting their website, eventually clicking on ads?
@KennyDreadfu1@Wokenessisevil Niggers being entitled that if it is in their disadvantage, there are ways around. A viking male earl can be a black female, no problem with the story, is not an important detail π€£. Past decade my racism went from 0 to 100%, in part from this woke shit, the rest from crimes
@Wokenessisevil Never the other way around from US cucks. Niggers as vikings or queen of England, sure, "artistic license". The last swap was maybe some decades ago Christ as a blonde white guy, when it should ve been a dark brown desert middle eastern. Since then the swaps are only one way
@UBERSOY1 Fucking india gipsies called so centuries, somehow in 90β they demanded to be called "roma" for whatever reason, not even a politically correct as in "handicapped - disabled".. Now they are "romanians"
@odysseymovie Sadly, Nolan did a huge mistake bending to wokeism and blackwashing. Liked Interstellar and Oppenheimer but i will not go to cinema for this, nor will i bother pirate it. Trash DEI is just trash, regardless of how good is the director. But best of luck to break even at box office
@robhak9@martinmbauer I m sorry if you are hurt, you just have no idea what you are talking about but you think you do. You mix up stuff, local frame of reference have nothing to do here. Didn't mean to offend you, really. Solution is to learn, educate yourself, not get hurt by "you talk nonsense".
@Lantenac@martinmbauer Well, today space is expanding at 22 km/s per million light years, but it is accelerating. We don't know if or when will stop. In the far future that our brains can't really comprehend you might get an expansion of 300k km/s for the size of a proton. Will it ride or disintegrate?
@Lantenac@martinmbauer OP might know what we he is talking. I am sure that TODAY nothing with mass can reach C, but in say 10 to the 60 years it might. Same law true as today, not moving through space, but moving with space far higher than C. So yeah, can't be sure 100 % that nothing will ever have C
@Lantenac@martinmbauer You are troll, i am absolut sure there ARE some absolute certainties, like the one in subject. You want me to prove the opposite. Ok, wasted some time with twitter philosophers, that's on me
@Lantenac@martinmbauer If you try to pump all the energy of the entire universe into a single proton to accelerate it to C, you will only get 0.999999999999999999999999(etc) of C. But you won't be able to make that proton get to the speed of light. You want me try to explain you why?
@Chris34259480@martinmbauer Nothing to do. A particle with non zero mass as it approaches C, regardless of how much energy you pump in it, that goes into increasing its mass not its velocity. Question was about "us" surpassing C, not the weird entanglement that is indeed weird.. But not a particle moving
@Lantenac@martinmbauer Depends on how educated you are in a highly complicated field of science. If you are enough, you know that this is indeed fundamental, as fundamental as other laws like "universe will always want to even and smooth things out, hence a scrambled egg will never reassemble itself".
@ShriPawar3000@martinmbauer Yes, it did and it does at cosmological bubbles of space, but question was about a particle with mass moving through space faster than C. This will never happen, ever
@robhak9@martinmbauer You talk nonsense. Yeah, time and lenghts change with c in your local reference, but no observer in this in universe with these laws, regardless of their velocity, will EVER see a particle with mass moving at exactly C. Surpassing speed C is of coyr5 out of question