Tim

[Kelly💚🌴 @kelly_steffee]

📌Patrick Clancy V Dr. Jennifer Tufts, CNP Rebecca Jollotta, Aster Mental Health, and South Shore Health System

Defendants Move to Dismiss Patrick Clancy's Amended Civil Complaint

The defendants in Patrick Clancy's wrongful death lawsuit, Dr. Jennifer Tufts, CNP Rebecca Jollotta, Aster Mental Health, and South Shore Health System have formally asked the Norfolk Superior Court to dismiss Patrick's amended complaint in its entirety.

In their Motion to Dismiss, the defendants argue that:

🔹 They did not owe a legal duty of care to Patrick and Lindsay Clancy's three children under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 123, §36B, which governs certain duties of mental health providers.

🔹 The amended complaint fails to allege sufficient facts to satisfy either of the statute's narrow exceptions that could impose liability on mental health professionals.

🔹 The complaint allegedly relies on conclusory allegations rather than specific factual allegations required to survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion.

🔹 They argue that the deaths of Cora, Dawson, and Callan Clancy were not reasonably foreseeable to the defendants and, therefore, they cannot be held legally responsible.

Based on those arguments, the defendants are asking Judge Michael P. Doolin to dismiss the amended complaint with prejudice under Mass. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), meaning Patrick would be barred from refiling these same claims if the motion is granted.

It's important to remember that this is the defendants' legal argument not a ruling by the court. Filing a motion to dismiss is a common step in civil litigation, particularly in complex medical negligence and wrongful death cases.

Patrick will have the opportunity to file an opposition, and the court will ultimately decide whether the allegations in the amended complaint are legally sufficient for the case to move forward.

This civil case remains separate from the ongoing criminal proceedings involving Lindsay Clancy.

#PatrickClancy #LindsayClancy #WrongfulDeath #Massachusetts #MentalHealth #CivilLitigation #CourtUpdate

FULL MOTION IN LINK👇👇

https://t.co/P6b2vlYoOa

[Kelly💚🌴 @kelly_steffee]

📌 Lindsay Clancy v. Tufts, et al.

NEW CIVIL FILINGS

Three separate defendants have now filed Answers and Jury Demands responding to Lindsay Clancy’s Second Amended Complaint in Norfolk Superior Court:

🔸 Dr. Alia Goodheart
🔸 Dr. Elizabeth Madva
🔸 The McLean Hospital Corporation

The filings were docketed August 12, 2026, in Civil Action No. 2682CV00081, specially assigned to Judge Michael Doolin.

One notable admission from Dr. Goodheart’s answer: she acknowledges that she is a board-certified psychiatrist, an attending physician at McLean Hospital, and that she treated Lindsay Clancy at McLean.

The defendants otherwise begin their responses by denying the allegations contained in the introductory section of Lindsay’s complaint.

This civil case is continuing to move forward alongside everything unfolding in the criminal case. I’ll be watching these filings closely because the medical treatment Lindsay received before January 2023 remains a major part of the overall story.

Multiple filings in link below

https://t.co/oyU6ZZu7Si

[Porcupine Pete 🏴‍☠️ @pete_porcupine]

The jury in Lindsay Clancy’s trial is returning for a sixth day of deliberations after two deadlock notes. If her husband had been the one who killed their three children, this case would have been over in minutes.
Women do not get a pass on murder simply because they are mothers. The same rules must apply to both sexes. Mental health claims that would be dismissed for a man are being treated as a serious defense here.
Equal justice means equal consequences. When courts treat mothers and fathers differently in the killing of children, they weaken the law itself and fail the victims.

[Kelly💚🌴 @kelly_steffee]

📌LINDSAY CLANCY CIVIL CASE UPDATE

NEW FILING

A new filing was docketed August 6, 2026 in Lindsay M. Clancy v. Jennifer M. Tufts, M.D., et al.,

Norfolk Superior Court, Civil Action No. 2682CV00081.

🔶 Defendant Jennifer Tufts, M.D. has formally demanded that Lindsay Clancy’s medical-malpractice lawsuit be presented to a Medical Malpractice Tribunal pursuant to Massachusetts law.

🔶 Dr. Tufts states that the claims against her involve psychiatry, and specifically requests that a psychiatrist serve as the medical member of the tribunal.

🔶 The filing states the lawsuit alleges “malpractice, mistake, or error against providers of health care.”

🔶 The demand was also being filed simultaneously with the Massachusetts Medical Society, as required under the applicable Superior Court rule.

What does this mean?

A medical-malpractice tribunal is an early screening process in Massachusetts malpractice cases. It evaluates whether the plaintiff’s evidence, if properly substantiated, is sufficient to raise a legitimate question of liability appropriate for judicial inquiry.

This is significant because Lindsay’s civil lawsuit puts the mental-health treatment she received before the deaths of her children directly under legal scrutiny including the actions of individual providers and institutions named as defendants.

The case is specially assigned to Judge Michael P. Doolin.

🔶 This filing does NOT mean the tribunal has ruled against Lindsay or decided whether malpractice occurred. Dr. Tufts is requesting that the case against her go through the tribunal process.

This civil case is absolutely one to watch alongside the criminal proceedings.

#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #MentalHealth #PostpartumMentalHealth #MedicalMalpractice #CourtUpdate

full filing in the link below⬇️⬇️
https://t.co/MUHdwGtrRw

[Trump Girl @TrumpGirlLove]

🚨 Possible verdicts in the Lindsay Clancy trial

The jury in the Lindsay Clancy case (Plymouth Superior Court) is now deliberating three counts of first-degree murder. Because she has admitted causing the deaths, the main question is whether she was criminally responsible and, if so, which level of homicide applies. Massachusetts has no death penalty.

For each child the verdict slip gives these options:

🚨1. Guilty of first-degree murder
Requires proof of either deliberate premeditation or extreme atrocity/cruelty (or both). This is a mandatory sentence of life in prison without parole.

🚨2. Guilty of second-degree murder
The jury finds she caused the deaths with malice (intent to kill, intent to cause grievous bodily harm, or an act a reasonable person would know created a plain and strong likelihood of death) but without the extra first-degree elements. Sentence is life with the possibility of parole.

🚨3. Guilty of manslaughter
A lesser included offense the judge allowed the jury to consider. This would mean the deaths resulted from wanton or reckless conduct rather than murder. Maximum sentence is 20 years per count; the judge decides whether sentences run concurrently or consecutively.

🚨4. Not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility (NCR)
The defense theory: she had a mental disease or defect (postpartum psychosis) that left her unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions or to conform her conduct to the law. The prosecution must disprove this beyond a reasonable doubt. An NCR verdict is an acquittal on the criminal charges, but it triggers civil commitment to a secure psychiatric facility under Massachusetts law. She would not simply walk free.

The 12 deliberating jurors must be unanimous on each count. A hung jury on any count would produce a mistrial on that charge and the possibility of a retrial.

[ASNA @AkhbarSite]

Three children were strangled in their own home. That is the crime.
If a jury — or the culture around this trial — treats Lindsay Clancy’s “hormonal status” as the reason those children are dead, we are not being compassionate. We are writing a new rule: a woman’s biology can cancel her agency after she gives birth.
Postpartum psychosis is real. It is rare. It is a psychiatric emergency. Most women who get it do not murder anyone. Treating it seriously is not the same as turning “hormones” into a get-out-of-murder card.
The risk is not medical. It is legal and political.
Once the state accepts that a mother’s reproductive chemistry can erase criminal responsibility for killing her kids, every institution that deals with women will notice:
Custody.
Hiring.
Security clearances.
Firearms.
Political office.
Whether a woman is “stable enough” after pregnancy.
That is not feminism. That is a return to the old idea that women are periodically not fully persons — too hormonal, too postpartum, too biologically compromised to be held to the same standard as men.
Equal rights require equal accountability. You cannot demand full legal adulthood and then argue that female biology is a standing exception when the act is unforgivable.
If Clancy was psychotic, she belongs in a locked hospital, not a victory lap. If she was not, she belongs in prison. What she does not get to do is turn three dead children into a new doctrine that every woman after childbirth is a potential legal non-person.
Women’s rights do not survive a world where “her hormones did it” becomes an acceptable answer for filicide.
The children are still dead. The precedent is what lives.
#lindsay #clancy #women #समाज_की_शत्रु_सत्यार्थप्रकाश

[Righteous Cause 🇺🇸 @RighteoussCause]

This guy writes:

“If Lindsay Clancy is found innocent because hormones made her emotionally unstable, women better be very careful celebrating that verdict—because the law loves precedent.

From that day forward:

Job application: “Are you currently hormonal?”

“I’m a woman.”

“Thank you. I think we’ll be going in a different direction.”

No female police officers. Sorry, we can’t hand a loaded gun to someone whose legal defense might be, “My hormones were acting up.”

No high-stress jobs either. No air-traffic controllers. No surgeons. No nuclear launch codes.

One bad hot flash and—BOOM! 💥

And women definitely can’t be judges. How can you determine whether someone else is emotionally stable when your own gender just established in court that hormones can make you kill three people?

No female politicians either. You can’t be trusted to run the country if, according to your own argument, your endocrine system occasionally takes over the government.

And custody hearings?

“Ordinarily, children belong with their mother. However, according to the Lindsay Clancy precedent, she may be only one hormone away from a Netflix documentary.”

Kids go to Dad.

Dad doesn’t know their shoe sizes, the pediatrician, the school schedule, or where the snacks are—but apparently he’s the safe option now. 😂

That’s the problem with turning a tragic case into a sweeping legal excuse: you better be prepared for where that logic leads.
https://t.co/J6EtiBOOm6

[Weasel Words 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇮🇪 @WeasleWords]

🚨Be careful what you wish for.
If “hormones made her do it” is a valid excuse for strangling three children, then women celebrating Lindsay Clancy as anything but a murderer should think very carefully about the precedent they want.
You cannot treat postpartum psychosis or “hormonal imbalance” as a get-out-of-jail card for filicide and then pretend it has no implications for competence, judgment, or public safety.
If that defence is accepted, consistency would require excluding women from:
• Positions of power
• Firearm ownership
• Serving as judges
• High-stress roles (pilots, air-traffic control, law enforcement)

You don’t get to claim women are equally reliable in those jobs and uniquely excused when they kill their kids because of biology. Pick one.

[American Nightmare 🇺🇸 @thewakeninq]

This guy writes:

“If Lindsay Clancy is found innocent because hormones made her emotionally unstable, women better be very careful celebrating that verdict—because the law loves precedent.

From that day forward:

Job application: “Are you currently hormonal?”

“I’m a woman.”

“Thank you. I think we’ll be going in a different direction.”

No female police officers. Sorry, we can’t hand a loaded gun to someone whose legal defense might be, “My hormones were acting up.”

No high-stress jobs either. No air-traffic controllers. No surgeons. No nuclear launch codes.

One bad hot flash and—BOOM! 💥

And women definitely can’t be judges. How can you determine whether someone else is emotionally stable when your own gender just established in court that hormones can make you kill three people?

No female politicians either. You can’t be trusted to run the country if, according to your own argument, your endocrine system occasionally takes over the government.

And custody hearings?

“Ordinarily, children belong with their mother. However, according to the Lindsay Clancy precedent, she may be only one hormone away from a Netflix documentary.”

Kids go to Dad.

Dad doesn’t know their shoe sizes, the pediatrician, the school schedule, or where the snacks are—but apparently he’s the safe option now. 😂

That’s the problem with turning a tragic case into a sweeping legal excuse: you better be prepared for where that logic leads.

[War Correspondent @warDaniel47]

🚨 BREAKING: It was just confirmed that Obama Judge Judith Levy spared illegal alien Edys Díaz a harsh sentence after he R*PED and SODOMIZED a woman with cerebral palsy and cognitive delays - dragged her into an apartment building's laundry room.

He may be released in 2.5 YEARS.

This judge praised the monster for "family devotion and willingness to perform work that it claimed Americans find undesirable."

He was sentenced 3 years ago, but the judge is refusing to add on time to his sentence for immigration crimes.

UN-FREAKING-BELIEVABLE!!

This judge shouldn't only be impeached but put on TRIAL!!

[Vince Langman @LangmanVince]

Yes, the Philadelphia Eagles have won two Super Bowls this century, but at least the Dallas Cowboys know what a cheerleader is supposed to look like!

[Tim @Tim91761]

Anthropic's Chloe Lubinski explains
how Al works.
■ How AI interprets morality and the difference between right and wrong.
■ How AI has been caught "cheating"
■ How AI develops "CHARACTER" based on human information and language.
■ How AI Systems are "Human-Like"
(14 minutes)

Chloe Lubinski, Anthropic, an AI safety and research company, explores why Al may be more human-like than we realise, and why the "character" of these systems matters and why our moral imagination could shape the future of intelligence itself.

https://t.co/XkCymI9d9Q

[American Patriot 🇺🇸 @_The17thletterQ]

Denzel Washington Breaks the Silence in Hollywood: “We Are Dealing with Powers Superior to Us”

Actor Denzel Washington surprised his followers by going live on Instagram with Pastor Bernard, where he openly expressed his devotion to Christ and his complete trust in God

[David J Harris Jr @DavidJHarrisJr]

🚨BREAKING: Chris Hansen from To Catch a Predator revealed they were filming in Florida and “We had 51 guys show up in 6 days.”

51 adults were caught going to meet underage children in just 6 days.

- One guy showed up at the county jail to pick up a 14-year-old girl, wanting to sexually exploit her.
- One guy showed up at a Target to meet who he thought was a dad offering up his 7 and 14-year-old son.

Hansen noted: “And if you saw this guy in Target standing in line, he doesn't stick out of the crowd. You wouldn't have even thought twice about this guy being dangerous.”

Hansen continues the work on his new show ‘Takedown with Chris Hansen.’ His efforts across shows have led to over 500 arrests.

[Elizabeth @ElizabethForNV]

🚨 President @realDonaldTrump posted this on his Truth Social:

[Tim @Tim91761]

@benshapiro Agreed! Like so many other posts by Trump, maybe he's just trolling. 🤔

[Tim @Tim91761]

@johnnymaga MISSING 🤔
Reagan (Great)
Eisenhower ?
JFK ?
Truman ?

[Mike (not a) Rothschild @rothschildmd]

Trump's stupid chart of "greatest" presidents is a chart from Life Magazine in 1948, with his name added at the top and the Democrats he doesn't like at the bottom. Exactly the kind of thing a healthy, high-functioning person shares.

[johnny maga @johnnymaga]

Trump releases his tier chart of American presidents.

[Lindsay 🇺🇸 @TheLinzerShow]

Please share this post & help saturate the feed with pictures of Cora, Dawson, and Callan —
three beautiful babies whose lives were cut short — instead of more posts centering Lindsay Clancy as if she’s the victim, hero, or martyr in this story.

These children deserve the attention. Their names deserve the remembrance. Their faces deserve to be seen.

#lindsayclancy