Seeing a lot of complaints about YŪGEN's WL allocation, and honestly I think people are mixing up two different things.
FCFS WL is essentially a mini public mint. Being whitelisted doesn't automatically mean you're guaranteed an allocation. That's common across NFTs.
Where I think @yugen_gg made a mistake was the ratio between available FCFS spots and the number of WL wallets. If too many people grind for WL and only a small fraction can actually mint, frustration is inevitable.
That said, this isn't evidence of a scam, stolen art, or a rug. Those accusations need actual proof.
A collection can have 700 supply, 700 GTD wallets, and still run an FCFS WL phase. The WL phase is often there for whatever supply remains after guaranteed allocations.
Criticize the allocation structure if you want, that's fair. But allocation design flaws and "it's a scam" are two very different conversations.
Seeing a lot of complaints about YŪGEN's WL allocation, and honestly I think people are mixing up two different things.
FCFS WL is essentially a mini public mint. Being whitelisted doesn't automatically mean you're guaranteed an allocation. That's common across NFTs.
Where I think @yugen_gg made a mistake was the ratio between available FCFS spots and the number of WL wallets. If too many people grind for WL and only a small fraction can actually mint, frustration is inevitable.
That said, this isn't evidence of a scam, stolen art, or a rug. Those accusations need actual proof.
A collection can have 700 supply, 700 GTD wallets, and still run an FCFS WL phase. The WL phase is often there for whatever supply remains after guaranteed allocations.
Criticize the allocation structure if you want, that's fair. But allocation design flaws and "it's a scam" are two very different conversations.
Seeing a lot of complaints about YŪGEN's WL allocation, and honestly I think people are mixing up two different things.
FCFS WL is essentially a mini public mint. Being whitelisted doesn't automatically mean you're guaranteed an allocation. That's common across NFTs.
Where I think @yugen_gg made a mistake was the ratio between available FCFS spots and the number of WL wallets. If too many people grind for WL and only a small fraction can actually mint, frustration is inevitable.
That said, this isn't evidence of a scam, stolen art, or a rug. Those accusations need actual proof.
A collection can have 700 supply, 700 GTD wallets, and still run an FCFS WL phase. The WL phase is often there for whatever supply remains after guaranteed allocations.
Criticize the allocation structure if you want, that's fair. But allocation design flaws and "it's a scam" are two very different conversations.
615 GTD + 85 Treasury, so nothing for FCFS
Same thing happened during Keys mint
It's so inhumane of you to promise.wl then end up adding people to fcfs again.
To say I'm disappointed is an understatement
You ain't building any shit IP because all you cared about is Sell out
You deserve to go to ZERO!!
Slowly, Momo is cooking.
The move from Tempo to ETH feels like the right one. More collectors, more visibility, and a bigger stage for what they're building.
What stands out to me is the identity. The fish-eye lens aesthetic, retro anime influence, and dreamy "peach-colored dreams" vibe make Momo instantly recognizable. That's harder to build than people think.
Supply is 4,444, so execution will be key. But the art is clean, the branding is memorable, and the love of my life @tessonchain is involved, so naturally I'm paying attention.
Follow @momoyumemi, @cutemikaasa and turn on notifications.