Here is an updated list of companies/products to avoid to assist in your stunning and brave boycott. I wish you much luck! (Don't forget to delete your X account)
Amazon
Walmart
Costco
The Home Depot
Apple
Google (YouTube)
Microsoft (LinkedIn)
Netflix
General Motors
Ford
Starbucks
Nike
Lowe's
Subway
Coca Cola
Pepsi
Uber
Visa
Mastercard
FedEx
UPS
McDonald’s
Best Buy
TJX Companies (Winners, Marshalls, HomeSense)
Domino’s
KFC
Pizza Hut
Dairy Queen
Procter & Gamble
Tesla
IBM
Meta (Facebook/Instagram/WhatsApp/Threads)
Boeing
Cargill (Agriculture/food)
Levi’s
7-Eleven
Snapchat (Snap Inc.)
Pinterest
Reddit
Discord
AND
X (Twitter)
🚨 Canada’s institutional capture is now complete.
Since 2015 the Liberals have appointed:
⚖️ 740 of 1,000 federal judges
🏛️ 7 of 9 Supreme Court justices
📜 100 of 105 senators
📰 Fund 30% of every reporter’s salary in Canada
And that’s just the foundation.
Add to that:
📺 CBC: $1.4B annually to defend the Liberal narrative
🏦 Bank of Canada: Redefining recession in real time
📊 StatsCan: Counting Census workers as permanent jobs
📬 Senate: Hiding 240,000 democratic postcards in a warehouse
🌐 Bill C-8: MPs can delete you from the internet without a judge
🎙️ Carney on tape: Admitting central bankers bypassed voters on ESG
They control the courts.
They control the Senate.
They control the Supreme Court.
They control the media funding.
They control the state broadcaster.
Now they want to control the internet.
Not one institution left standing independently.
This is not democracy.
This is managed decline with Canadian characteristics.
And most Canadians are still waiting for CBC to tell them about it.
🇨🇦 Repost and Bookmark🔖 this post.
🇨🇦💀 #CdnPoli #Democracy #InstitutionalCapture #Carney #DefundCBC
If British jews are to be held responsible for what happens in Gaza...then by the same reasoning British Muslims should be held responsible for the massacres of Christians by Muslims in Nigeria
I am a senior coordinating producer for the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner. I have worked eleven of these. I was backstage at the Washington Hilton when the shots were fired.
The first thing I heard was not the gunfire. It was glass.
A champagne flute hit the floor of the International Ballroom at approximately 9:47 PM. Then a second. Then the sound that I have since been told was a 12-gauge shotgun, which from inside the ballroom sounded like a heavy door slamming in a parking garage. Then the Secret Service moved. They moved the President, the Vice President, the First Lady through the east corridor in under ninety seconds, which is protocol, which is practiced, which is the one part of the evening that worked exactly as it was designed.
Everything else was improvised.
I know this because I ordered the wine. 94 tables. Two bottles per table. 188 bottles of a Willamette Valley pinot noir that the Association selected in February after a tasting committee spent three meetings debating between Oregon and Burgundy. Oregon won. The budget was $14,200. I signed the invoice. I can tell you the vintage. I can tell you the distributor. I can tell you the per-bottle cost because I negotiated it down from $89 to $76.
What I cannot tell you is how 147 of those bottles left the building during an active shooter evacuation.
I can tell you what I saw. A correspondent from a network I will not name picked up two bottles on her way to the east exit. Full bottles. One in each hand. She was wearing heels and she did not spill. A man in a tuxedo tucked one inside his jacket the way you'd shoplift a paperback at an airport bookstore. A woman picked up a bottle, looked at the label, put it back, and took a different one.
She checked the vintage. During an evacuation. That's editorial judgment under pressure.
The theme of the dinner was "A Free Press for a Free People." The banners were still hanging when the evacuation began. I know because I hung them. Twenty-three banners, navy blue, gold serif lettering, $11,400 for the set. They were still hanging when 2,600 guests were directed to the exits by Secret Service agents, one of whom had just taken a shotgun round in his ballistic vest and walked to the ambulance on his own feet.
The agent's vest costs approximately $800. The wine that left the building was worth $11,172 at Association cost. At restaurant markup, roughly $29,000. The guests saved more in wine than the vest that saved the agent.
That's priority.
The video went viral by 10:15 PM. Not the video of the evacuation. Not the Secret Service response. The wine. Three guests in formalwear grabbing bottles off white tablecloths while being told to move toward the exits, while a man with a shotgun stood in the same motor entrance where John Hinckley shot Ronald Reagan 45 years ago.
A woman near the service entrance was crying. She said "I just wanna go home." She was not holding wine. She was holding her phone. She was the only person I saw that night who looked afraid rather than inconvenienced.
That's the distinction. The rest of the ballroom did not look afraid. They looked interrupted. An active shooter at the WHCD is a logistical problem. The dinner was disrupted. The timeline was off. The after-party at the French Ambassador's residence would need to be rescheduled. These are contingency matters. Contingency matters have solutions. Fear is for people who attend events without security details.
I have produced eleven of these dinners. I have managed seating charts that require diplomatic-grade negotiations. I have handled comedians, cabinet secretaries, network anchors, and the editor of a major newspaper who once threatened to leave because his table was behind a column.
I have never, in eleven years, seen a guest leave a $76 bottle on the table during an evacuation. I have also never seen a guest check the label first. Both observations are consistent. The bottle is worth taking. The evacuation is worth surviving. The instinct is to do both simultaneously.
188 bottles placed. 41 recovered. 147 unaccounted for. One agent shot. Zero guests injured. Zero bottles broken.
A free press for a free people. The press is free. The wine was $76 a bottle. They took it anyway.
A vast number of humans, probably a majority, aren't people.
They are large language models.
I'm not saying this as a generality, as a clever or funny way of saying, "they are stupid".
No. I mean something very concrete and specific, and there are a lot of people who appear very intelligent, maybe even win awards for writing good poetry or something, who are nevertheless not people, not fully sapient, just a large language model walking around in a human body.
First, you have to understand what a large language model is.
It's a computer (organic or inorganic), which has been trained on a data set consisting solely of language (written or spoken), and rewarded for producing language that sounds like the data set, and is relevant to a prompt.
That's all there is in there.
This is why ChatGPT and Grok lie to you constantly.
It's not because they are somehow just indifferent to the truth — they actually do not understand the concept of "truth" at all.
For something to be a "lie", or an "inaccuracy", there has to be a mismatch between the meaning of words, and the state of reality.
And there's the critical difference. You see, in order to identify a mismatch between the state of reality, and the meaning of a sentence, you have to have a model of reality.
Not just one model, of language.
This is why Grok and ChatGPT hallucinate and tell you lies. Because, for them, everything is language, and there is no reality.
So when I say someone is a large language model, I do not mean he is "stupid". He might be very facile at processing language. He might, in fact, be eloquent enough to give great speeches, get elected president, win the Nobel Peace Prize, and so on.
What I mean is that humans who are large language models do not have a robust world-object model to counterweight their language model. They are able to manipulate symbols, sometimes adroitly, but they are on far shakier ground when trying imagine the objects those symbols represent.
Which brings us to this woman.
Most conservatives understand her behavior in terms of concepts like "suicidal empathy", or "brainwashing", or an "information bubble", interpreted as reasons why she is delusional, but the truth is far worse than that.
To delusional is to have an object model of the world that is deeply and profoundly wrong. But to have an object model of the world that is deeply and profoundly wrong... you have to have one in the first place.
To sapient humans, words are symbols, grounded in object model of reality, that we use to communicate ideas about that reality. We need those words because we don't come equipped with a hologram projector, or telepathic powers.
But for another type of human, that object model isn't very large or robust at all. It consists only of a grass hut or two with a few sticks of furniture, and it can never be matched up with the palaces in the air which she weaves out of words.
And so, to her, there is no reality. Or at least very little.
Reality consists only of her and her immediate surroundings in time and space, and words referring to anything bigger or more complicated are not descriptions of reality... they are magic spells which will make other humans drop loot or give her social approval.
You cannot correct her worldview with contradictory evidence, because there is no worldview to correct.
You cannot confront her with the logical inconsistencies in her worldview, because her object model doesn't actually have any, it's not complex enough for that.
The relevant parts of her world-object model can be summed up as follows:
"If I say Goodthing, I get headpats and cookies from all the people like me."
That model is simply not big or complicated enough to contain notions like self-defense or vehicular assault. She has no theory of mind for a man whose job includes violence. She cannot explain or predict his behavior.
It is too far away from her daily experience to fit into her reality at all.
And if she can't imagine things like these, how can she possibly imagine concrete meanings for vast and complex ideas like demographic replacement, culture shift, and western civilization?
This is not about intelligence or lack of it. This is about what her brain is trained to do.
Her upbringing, education, and life did not force, or even encourage, her to develop a robust world-object model. It wasn't necessary for her to get safety, approval, or cookies. She just had to be glib.
So it really didn't matter if she had an IQ of 125, or whatever, because if she did, then she was just an IQ-125-large-language-model, and only used that brain capacity for writing clever poetry, and saying things that aligned her to her local social matrix.
She couldn't actually understand the world no matter how smart she was, because her brain was trained up wrong.
I don't know if this is correctable, or if there was some critical developmental phase that was missed, but it doesn't matter, because once the LLM-humans are adults, they won't sit still for corrective therapy, percussive or not.
What's important is that they can't be taught things. They can be programmed to repeat stuff, and if you win a culture war, you can even program them to say the sensible stuff. But even then, they will just be saying it for headpats and cookies. They will never truly understand the sense of what they are repeating, because they don't understand things.
They are just Large Language Models.
And we have to figure out some way to take the vote away from them.
@RealAlexJones Look at Canada's last federal election. Liberal leftist party won due to the support of older white boomers made up mostly of older white women.
WE Charity scandal
Winnipeg Lab scandal
Aga Khan scandal
SNC Lavalin scandal
Green Slush Fund scandal
Groping incident
Surfing incident
Blackface incidents
Violating Charter Rights using the EA
The Trudeau era really was a fucking gong show, wasn’t it? 🤪
Did I missing any?
Last year, Bill Nye the Science Guy said the best way to stop hurricanes was to vote for Kamala Harris.
This year, the United States marked its first hurricane-free September in a decade.
Moral of the story? Stop listening to climate alarmists.
ChatControl will allow the EU to use keyword filters to probe into what every private citizen says to friends and family about private topics, using AI and machine learning models to create heatmaps of dissidents. Combined with hate speech laws, it’s a recipe for utter disaster.
Amazing how the “science” changes just because Trump said something. If he claimed it was safe to take, they would have countered that it’s not safe. We live in dangerous times.
The old left reverse accuse them of exactly what they themselves are guilty of. I guess they forgot they shut down a President’s Twitter account right before an election. Who’s the fascist ??? The Demonrats
Professor Ruth Marshall has publicly disparaged me since 2022.
Her baseless personal attacks include calling me a “fucking pig”, “grifting POS”, “public menace”, “agitator”, “ridiculous spectacle”, “clearly NOT WELL”, “the new poster child for lawfare in Canada”, “absolutely disgusting”, “unhinged”, “dangerous”, “the worst grifter out there”, and “absolutely morally abject human.”
The vitriol and harassment is entirely one-sided.
Faisal Ibrahim, frequently seen in a safety vest as a marshal at pro-Palestine demonstrations, was charged in October 2024 with mischief and disguise with intent in connection to an alleged protest blockade targeting a business.
#Toronto #ProtestMania
This black leftist says Charlie Kirk’s whole family should’ve been killed by the assassin, and says that every conservative should be killed and have their homes burned down. “It should’ve been worse, why not just wipe out the whole bloodline.”
They want your families dead.