@farmingandJesus Ok, wil Protestants stop pretending like everything they believe is self evident in the Bible.
You can’t find two protestants that come to the same interpretation!
@NateBornAgain I say it is. But it’s not offensive to say that they don’t read it as much as Protestant do.
we have devotional practices that some Catholics prioritized over reading the Bible.
Reading scripture is very good, but I don’t think God will hold anybody accountable for this choice
@MJKelleyII@WCatholic63559 Wordplay fallacy.
The term was formalized later, but they believed in the essence of the idea from the beginning.
Just like the term Trinity came later, but they believed in the essence of the idea from the beginning.
@CatholicDrip___ Acts 15 documented the Council of Jerusalem in AD 60, when it happened around AD 40. For 20 years that council was binding on the faithful before it was written down.
If a Prot was transported to AD 50, they couldn’t accept it because it wasn’t written down yet. 🤣
@ScottRoberts Correction, you accept the Calvinist interpretation of the Bible.
Prots are delusional thinking the Bible is a systematic theology, instead they read into the text what they want to believe.
@RJBooks222@BonejackVintage@TrevorSheatz So when Christ said the Holy Spirit will lead you in all truth, does that mean the Holy Spirit waited 1500 years to lead Christians in all truth?
Do you realize your position undermines Christ’s teachings?
@needGod_net What about when the messages are to love and serve her son, Jesus?
Also, in her messages she urges for humility- something the devil can’t do.
@needGod_net Did you intentionally produce a fallacy here? Is there a more clear case of “argument from silence” anywhere?
Paul didn’t say it, therefore it’s not true.
Protestantism = stupidity
@SoliDeoGloria_X You falsely have applied very liberally definition of worship.
For example:
Catholic: Mary pray for us.
You: thats worship!
—
You: Hey Bill, will you pray for me?
You: Not worship.
Protestantism = stupidity