Tom Murray

A strong conservative defender of our constitutional republic, who believes in holding government representatives accountable to their oaths of office.

[Tom Murray @TomMurrayJr1]

The craziest thing…anyone in the know that has read the Forensic audit report knows they acknowledged there was vote dilution.

Official Complaints were filed with @CivilRights , why has an investigation not been conducted???

Richard v Sununu recently filed certiorari with SCOTUS. Let’s hope it’s granted…then it will blow the doors wide open on NH and the 2020 election.

https://t.co/cDXGO1KZKZ

[Tom Murray @TomMurrayJr1]

@TheSCIF @TalkMullins has done what very few reporters are willing to do anymore, dig into the actual documents, attend the hearings, ask uncomfortable questions, and follow stories the corporate media often ignores.

Best truth reporting in the industry!!!👍

[Tom Murray @TomMurrayJr1]

Not true…and this grossly misrepresents what the SB 43 Forensic Audit actually found.

First, nobody serious claimed that Dominion machines “systematically removed 6% of GOP votes statewide.” Windham did not even use Dominion Democracy Suite systems. Windham used Diebold/LHS AccuVote optical scanners.

Second, the audit absolutely DID confirm that significant vote-counting discrepancies occurred due to fold-induced overvotes. That is not “conspiracy theory”, it is literally documented in the official SB 43 forensic audit report unanimously authorized by the New Hampshire Legislature.

The report confirmed:
• Fold lines crossing candidate ovals created false overvotes.
• The scanners interpreted many folded ballots as votes where no vote existed.
• Entire ballot sections were then discarded because the machine interpreted them as overvotes.
• This disproportionately impacted Republican candidates in the Windham race.

THIS IS THE DEFINITION OF VOTE DILUTION.

And contrary to the claim above, this issue was NOT necessarily isolated to Windham. The forensic audit itself acknowledged the same ballot geometry and scanner behavior could occur anywhere similar ballot layouts and folding practices existed.

AND IT DID!!!

What caused the conditions for this problem? Massive expansion of absentee voting during COVID.

Under the New Hampshire Constitution, Part II, Article 32, absentee voting is limited to voters who are absent from their city or town, physically disabled, or otherwise legally qualified. During 2020, absentee voting was dramatically expanded, resulting in unprecedented volumes of folded mail ballots being rapidly processed through commercial folding equipment.

That matters because approximately 30% of ballots in some jurisdictions became absentee ballots, dramatically increasing the number of folded ballots run through optical scanners.

Most importantly, the forensic audit proved the system is not infallible. The physical paper ballots, and the hand recount, corrected the machine tabulation discrepancies.

That is precisely why election integrity, chain of custody, reconciliation, and forensic review matter.

We have all the evidence:
We have the audit report.
We have the tally tapes.
We have the ballots.
And the official findings speak for themselves.

This is why Daniel Richard’s lawsuit (Richard v Sununu) has proceeded to the Supreme Court of the United States.

I believe it represents the only active election lawsuit from 2020.

#NHpolitics
@HarmeetKDhillon
@CivilRights
@DRichardNH

[Tom Murray @TomMurrayJr1]

@djjsilkfarm @NHGOP @GraniteGrok https://t.co/n2dEMiplnH

[NHGal @djjsilkfarm]

@NHGOP @TomMurrayJr1 @GraniteGrok https://t.co/0zcTn8qC2P

[Tom Murray @TomMurrayJr1]

Everything Dave said is spot on.

For the non believers simply read the SB 43 Forensic Audit report. https://t.co/cDXGO1KZKZ

Official complaints were filed with the DOJ Civil Rights Division @HarmeetKDhillon in July 2025.

Moreover NH has the only election case still alive today, Richard v Sununu.

It finally made its way to SCOTUS where a request for Certiorari was filed just a month ago.

More to come on that.

[Tom Murray @TomMurrayJr1]

New Hampshire is a Dillon’s Rule state. Municipalities are creatures of the Legislature and possess only those powers expressly granted to them by the Constitution and statutes.

The office of “Selectman” is not simply a casual local label, it is a constitutional and statutory office embedded throughout New Hampshire law, including Part II, Article 32 of the NH Constitution and RSA Chapter 41.

If people want to formally change the legal office from “Selectman” to “Selectperson,” that is not something a town can simply decide on its own through custom, policy, or political preference.

In my opinion, doing so without proper constitutional and legislative authority would be unlawful and unconstitutional.

Words matter in constitutional government. Offices created by the Constitution cannot simply be rewritten administratively because modern politics finds the terminology unfashionable.

If the people of New Hampshire wish to amend the Constitution, there is a lawful process to do so under Part II, Article 100. Until then, public officials should follow the Constitution and statutes as written…not as they wish them to be.

Only in “Win-dumb”🤦‍♂️

[Tom Murray @TomMurrayJr1]

https://t.co/q4azGtff2U

[NH4TRUMP @Nh4Trump603]

NH4TRUMP OFFICIALLY ENDORSES SCOTT BROWN FOR US SENATE

After conducting multiple public and private polls throughout the New Hampshire MAGA grassroots community, the results were overwhelming and undeniable.

In public polling, @SenScottBrown consistently received 85% or higher favorability over establishment pick, @SununuSenator. Within privately vetted America First patriot groups, support for Scott Brown was nearly unanimous, while support for John Sununu was virtually nonexistent.

The message from the grassroots could not be clearer: the New Hampshire MAGA America First movement is mostly mobilizing behind Scott Brown.

It is also important to remember that nearly 400,000 Granite Staters voted for President Trump in 2024. NH4TRUMP was built to represent that America First voter base — a massive coalition of New Hampshire voters that establishment candidates like John Sununu simply cannot rely on for support, in fact, he loses our entire base.

There is no path to victory for John Sununu.

As representatives of NH4TRUMP and the New Hampshire MAGA grassroots movement, we are proud to give our full and complete endorsement to Scott Brown for United States Senate in New Hampshire.

#NH4TRUMP #NHMAGA #NHPolitics

[Bruce R.Breton @bbretonwindham]

Thank You-A well-deserved gift for @Nh4Trump603's founder Bob “Kooch” Coutu for helping to MAGA #NHPolitics #MAGA #NH4TRUMP

[Tom Murray @TomMurrayJr1]

New Hampshire’s freedom doesn’t come from passing new amendments, it comes from following the Constitution we already have.

Part I, Article 12 says it plainly:

No part of a man’s property shall be taken… without consent.

That raises a fundamental question of governmental limits. In a bi-partite constitution rights are greater than government.

Where is the constitutional grant of authority to tax personal income in the first place?

If that authority doesn’t exist, then we don’t need an amendment to ban it, we need to recognize that it was never permitted to begin with.

[NH4TRUMP @Nh4Trump603]

🚨 HAPPENING NOW!
NH Investigative Journalist Heather Mullins @TalkMullins of @RealLindellTV interviews NH Senate Candidate Scott Brown @SenScottBrown.

Stay tuned for the interview drop!

#NH4TRUMP #NHMAGA #NHPolitics

[Tom Murray @TomMurrayJr1]

That protection already exists.

Part I, Article 12 is clear:
No person’s property can be taken without the consent of the people.
So before we start amending the Constitution, ask the obvious question:

Where was the original grant of authority to tax personal income in the first place?

[Tom Murray @TomMurrayJr1]

The people are the sovereign, government doesn’t create consent, it derives it.

The legislature is just an agent, and its authority is limited by the Constitution. When it acts beyond those limits, it is no longer representing the people’s consent.

Now look at this from the Voters’ Guide:

“AT THE PRESENT TIME, the house of representatives may adopt a tax on personal income.”

Says who?

Show me the grant of authority.

Part I, Article 12 is clear: no property can be taken without the consent of the people. A legislative vote doesn’t magically create powers that were never granted in the first place.

That’s the real issue, not whether a tax needs 51% or 67%, but whether the authority exists at all.

Bill of Rights Part I Article I “all government of right originates from the people, is founded in consent”

[Tom Murray @TomMurrayJr1]

The people are the true sovereign and the source of all consent. The legislature is merely an agent of that consent, and its authority is limited to what the Constitution permits. When the legislature acts beyond those limits, it cannot claim to represent the people’s consent.

"VII. Voters' Guide. AT THE PRESENT TIME, the house of representatives may adopt a tax on personal income. IF THE AMENDMENT IS ADOPTED, the house of representatives may not adopt a tax on personal income."

If this was true, which it is NOT, simply show me the grant of authority. Part I article 12 requires the "consent" of the people.

The people have NEVER granted that consent to tax their income, period!

[Brian Cole for Congress @cole4nh]

Today I had a great roundtable discussion, sitting down with some great conservative leaders to talk about the SAVE America Act and how closely it aligns with the laws we’ve already fought hard to pass here in New Hampshire.

We covered a lot of ground, but one message stood out above the rest: it has never been more important to have a strong, consistent conservative voice representing us in Washington. I look forward to being that voice in Washington come November.

[Scott P. Brown @SenScottBrown]

What an amazing evening at my Campaign Launch event.

I received another endorsement!! The youth are flocking to my campaign. I’m honored to endorse and help Nino Giuffrida for his selectman race as well.

[Tom Murray @TomMurrayJr1]

@EricLDaugh Sununu doesn't have the NH grassroots support, he wont make it through the primary. I predict @SenScottBrown will win the New Hampshire Republican Primary.

[Bruce R.Breton @bbretonwindham]

REPORT FOR DUTY 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Space is filling up fast. RSVP now to secure your spot - https://t.co/MPzjyCzkfu
#NHPolitics