It was my 10th anniversary of joining Twitter last week; it’s the only social media platform I’ve ever really engaged with. But I guess when it’s time to go, it’s time to go.
You can find me @drsamaki.bsky.social
@PaulbernalUK Why are we worried about such constitutional matters, when there are people in this world suffering from the likes of pseudopseudohypoparathyroidism and pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis?
I need a nice, easy guide to the Philosophy of recent developments in AI that’ll stop me worrying about all of this, as I know enough for it to bother me but not enough to reach any conclusions. Any pointers? 4
While the trolley problem took off in the public imagination, it seems that there are many thought experiments in the Philosophy of Mind and Philosophy of Language that seem relevant to our current situation; with a lot of ants doing a lot of caricatures of Winston Churchill. 1
But: what does it then mean for the status of a conversation with a chatbot? It doesn’t seem to reach any kind of standard of reference to the world (real or imaginary). So is there nothing going on here except the user anthropomorphising the chatbot? 3
The injustice of requiring identification to attend school: it takes a societal harm falling upon the broad shoulders of the state(‘ghost children’ and corruption in schools) and makes it an individual harm (kids from marginalised backgrounds can’t attend school).
I don't know if @Suitpossum is still around Twitter, but it's interesting to note that Sweden and Norway are starting to do the right thing (not least, for the hundreds of thousands excluded from these systems); all it took was an unprecedented global crisis to do it.
Sweden and Norway are realising that their cashless systems are vulnerable to Russian cyberattacks, and so are back to encouraging the use of cash.
https://t.co/fPz6uTq1Oq
In other news: the push for DPI around the world continues regardless.
Please join me for the @SOASHistory seminar where I’ll be presenting the findings of our recent project to explore whether a reframing of the Windrush Scandal as an international statelessness crisis will help to develop new modes of resistance & advocacy https://t.co/UEk7bZd1bt
This is unbelievably lazy and dangerous, especially from a former solicitor running to lead the Conservative Party
Robert Jenrick gets the charges wrong then launches into "cover-up" dogwhistle while surely knowing how the law limits what information can be released before trial
@TomSamaki The DVS section is unsafe as it has too many ministerial powers. I suggest amending DVS so an independent party (@ICOnews??) develops a statutory Code of Practice to incorporate the officially approved identity principles into the DVS section. See https://t.co/HdYxZPX6Oi